Youth Criminal Justice Act

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Bigyan12
Words 1575
Pages 7
The consequences of the Youth Criminal Justice Act [YCJA] can be referred as too light. Since the YCJA has taken over, youth crime is slowly decreasing. The discipline of the YCJA may need to become harsher. The YCJA has evolved from the harsh Young Offenders Act [YOA]. Stats on youth crime suggest that the YCJA is helping to reduce the amount of young offenders. Some cases suggest that the YCJA is not being tough enough with what young offenders are being sentenced with. The study of the human brain suggest that youths don’t understand the consequences of the crimes that they are committing resulting in the need for them to know the consequences. Through cases and the study of the human brain the YCJA needs some aspects changed for the better of society. The evolution of the YCJA has been formed from many different acts. Each act consists of similarities and differences between them. Different acts are formed over time to satisfy the needs of punishment as the world develops. The YCJA is the newest act which consist of similarities and differences of the YOA. The main difference of the YCJA and the YOA was the severity of the penalty for the crime committed. The YOA “was a highly controversial statute. While conservative politicians criticized the law for being ‘‘soft on youth crime,’’’ (Pulis). Since the YOA was soft on youth punishment, youths were not too concerned if they broke the law. Youths would break the law get a slap on the wrist and move on to committing more crimes. That is the main reason the YCJA was created. The YCJA was created “to reduce the use of courts and custody for the majority of adolescent offenders and to improve the effectiveness of responses to the relatively small number of young offenders convicted of serious crimes of violence” (Pulis). To reduce the amount of crime committed by youths, the YCJA was created. This act…...

Similar Documents

Criminal Justice

...Justice System Position Intro to Criminal Justice 21 OCT 2012 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to explain how imperative it is to maintain the juvenile justice system as a separate entity from the adult court systems. It must stay separate in both the way cases are disposed and in the way sentence is carried out. Namely, punishment as in the adult system must be avoided and continued to be replaced by rehabilitation. In recent years, there has been intensive debate about whether the juvenile justice system should focus its limited resources on rehabilitation or punishment to curtail the rising statistics in juvenile delinquency. It is my belief that the juvenile justice system should primarily focus on the process of juvenile rehabilitation as opposed to strictly punishment. This paper will include an assessment of law enforcement, court processes, probation corrections, and community services as well as the intervention programs currently available to increase the incidents of juvenile delinquency. In this paper the subject to examine is both sides of the spectrum and try to show that the process of rehabilitation, rather than just straight punishment will provide a more effective solution to the problem of juvenile delinquency. I will be examining some of the arguments that oppose the views of rehabilitation over punishment and attempt to prove that the arguments for punishment are not as valid as......

Words: 2127 - Pages: 9

Social Justice Versus Criminal Justice

...SOCIAL JUSTICE This is a sample paper for Dr. Matthew Robinson’s class … CJ 5150, “American Justice System and Social Justice” at Appalachian State University The paper is not be used for any purpose other than illustration for students in the class!!! Social Justice versus Criminal Justice Appalachian State University Social Justice versus Criminal Justice In this paper I will discuss how different aspects, policies, and procedures of the United States criminal justice system are inconsistent with the principles of social justice posited by John Rawls and David Miller. The criminal justice system does not promote socially just outcomes or practices. First of all, the criminal justice system is not really a system at all; it is a network. Second, criminal justice places greater emphasis on crime control, rather than due process rights. Our system encourages punishment rather than rehabilitation. Finally, criminal justice policies such as the death penalty and the war on drugs reflect prejudices within the system, resulting in unequal treatment. Before beginning to explain these flaws within criminal justice, I will first define social justice and explain the essential social justice principles suggested in Rawls and Miller’s theories. Social Justice Justice is based on two supposedly equal conceptions. First, guilty offenders are held accountable for their actions and second, that criminal justice......

Words: 5791 - Pages: 24

Criminal Justice

...Criminal Justice and Over Crowding Criminal behavior occurs every minute of every day across the globe. Throughout time many offenders have been sentence and released for crimes committed. As the years pass, by not only has the type of criminal behavior changed but also the age of the offender. Overcrowding in the criminal justice system is at an all-time high with no end in sight. Laws are changed through trial and error. Change does seem to be evolving with the focus and understanding of the dangers when it comes to overcrowding. The Dangers of overcrowding: Prison Murders, Rapes, Suicides, (Offenders and Correctional Staff), are increasing within the prison setting. There appears to be fewer officers, nurses, and psychologist to meet the needs of the prisoner. Too few staff members not only promote violence, but also place the community in harm’s way. Prison escapes seem to be a special concern when it comes to the safety to victims and families involved. Mental Patients: In many cases mentally challenged offenders are misdiagnosed or simply housed with the regular population due to overcrowding and lack of staff. This lessens the likelihood of rehabilitation prevailing, without proper medical care and counseling. In these cases violence could present or incite riots, escapes and death. In California, there have been several mental patients who were found dead due to suicide incidents. In these cases it would seem to be easy for a prisoner, who has...

Words: 518 - Pages: 3

Criminal Justice

...The criminal justice is the system of practices and institutions of governments directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crime, or sanctioning those who violate laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. Those accused of crime have protections against abuse of investigatory and prosecution powers. (Legal definition, Jan. 2013) retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/criminal_justice_system. The process of criminal justice is initial contact when a police officer observes a criminal act by patrolling the streets or citizens notifying even a victim of investigation, arrest, custody, indictments, complaints, charging bail or detention, plea bargaining, adjudication deposition and post conviction remedies. Investigation is getting accurate and relevant facts or evidence to identify the offender/suspect. Investigation is when a crime is made and “evidence is gathered to follow up on an investigation” (Forensic Enterprise 2009, retrieved from http://www.feinc.net/sci-deschtm. it takes approx 2 to 3 hours a day to gather information for about 4 days. Investigation is part of the process so police can find the criminal. An arrest warrant is made when there are criminals at the scene of the crime. A police officer makes the arrest and reads the criminal their rights and they are incarcerated. When the criminal is incarcerated there is no freedom and the criminal is unable to perform normal activities. “confinement” (Legal......

Words: 900 - Pages: 4

Criminal Justice

...Notes For Criminal Justice (Unit 1) Muse: What lies ahead for the criminal justice system? We cannot say for sure. Some of the coming changes are now discernible. A few of the more obvious changes include: 1. a restructuring of the juvenile justice system due to increasing violent juvenile crime and youth gang warfare; 2. the increased bankruptcy of a “war against drugs” whose promises seem increasingly hollow; 3. a growing recognition of America’s international role as both victim and purveyor of worldwide criminal activity; and 4. The rapid emergence of cyber-crimes, which both employ high technology in the commission and target the fruits of such technology. Drugs and Crime The relationship between drugs and crime rests on the concept of drug abuse. Drug abuse is illicit drug use that results in physiological, social, psychological or legal problems for the user. A drug is any chemical substance defined by social convention as bioactive or psychoactive. A psychoactive substance is a chemical substance that affects cognition, feeling, or awareness. Most drug users are recreational drug users, using drugs relatively infrequently and primarily with friends and in social contexts that define drug use as pleasurable. Most addicts begin as recreational users. Drug crimes fall into two categories: 1. the use, possession, distribution and sale of illegal drugs and the offenses committed either under the influence of drugs or surrounding the growing,......

Words: 3699 - Pages: 15

Criminal Justice

...Is the U.S. Criminal Justice System a true system? William H. Watson IV University of Maryland University College Is the U.S. Criminal Justice System a true system? The criminal justice system in the United States (U.S.) is not a true system; or at least not a true functioning system. A true system is a fine tuned process, where all participants involved work towards a common goal. Every transition in a true system, is a smooth change, where no participants in the system will do anything to jeopardize the proper functionality of the next process in that system. This is not the case of the U.S. criminal justice system. The U.S. criminal justice system is comprised of numerous individuals, groups, organizations, and agencies funded by both government and non-government sources. Because, the U.S. criminal justice system is funded from different entities, there are several different agendas being carried out. There are three major components to the administration of the U.S. criminal justice system: the police, the courts, and corrections. In a perfect criminal justice system the police would arrest violators of the law, the courts would prosecute all law violators, and corrections would punish and rehabilitate violators, to integrate them back into society. While this is the formula the U.S. criminal justice system governs itself by, reality shows us that this quite often this is not the case. Only ten percent of court cases ever go to trial, with......

Words: 6671 - Pages: 27

Criminal Justice

...The Criminal Justice System, a system the British government set up to deal with the treatment of law-breakers, has three main goals to achieve social order, these are, (1) enforcing criminal law, (2) maintaining law and order in the society, and (3) helping victims. This may seem to be a well thought of system, but like any other organisation, there are flaws, and one of the major flaws is discrimination, and the bias that stems from discrimination. Discrimination on the basis of class, gender, sexuality and ethnicity operates at the level of attitude, on the street, in the home, at the workplace or at social venues. In regards to the Criminal Justice System, race and gender are always accounted for in court proceedings. As Smith in 1997 said, “the apparent ‘fairness’ of the criminal justice system does not mean that the outcomes will necessarily be unbiased”. Tonry in 1997 found that even though certain ethnic groups are far more often caught in the net of criminal justice than others, they have elevated rates of official offending which differ from one country to another. The major ethnic group in Britain and Wales being black people whose families originated from the Caribbean in the 1940’s. (cited in the Oxford Handbook). Black people find themselves subject to rules made for them by white people, it is also the same for other groups living in the same culture, e.g. it seems to be men that make the rules for the women in society, even though this seems to be......

Words: 1848 - Pages: 8

Criminal Justice

...control models consists of challenging crime and allowing the right justice to be issued. Both models are used in the criminal justice system throughout the United States. The purpose of the two models are to maintain a safety to society, and to protect the criminal’s rights. Both the due process and crime control models are created in theories from criminologists. The due process model is more concerned with individual integrity. It also focuses on more of protecting the society rights. There are many weakness in the due process model. They focus more on the root causes are poverty and racial discrimination. The due process also stresses the possibility of error in the informal fact-finding process and therefore insists on formal fact-finding to protect against mistakes made by the police and prosecutors (w.Neubeauer). The due process models also grants too much leeway and could possibly result in loss of freedom and civil liberties. But most importantly the due process models was designed to make sure the people rights were portrayed ,and they had a fair trial to defend themselves in court. The crime control model was mad to ensure the criminal cases were dealt with quickly so that the criminal was charges at the earliest opportunity. The criminal justice system condemns individuals for partaking in criminal actions. I believe the crime control model was made to concentrate on the conviction. The criminal justice system didn’t really look at as if the defendant was......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Criminal Justice

...Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Name Institutional affiliation   There are numerous law enforcement and criminal justice careers. One of these careers is that of a Crime Scene Investigator. The responsibilities of these personnel are not as exotic and glamorous as portrayed by many television shows. Responsibilities of Crime Scene Investigators Crime Scene Investigators investigate, evaluate, analyse and supervise investigations in the scene of crime. The do this by the use of techniques that are aimed at collecting, cultivating and securing physical evidence. They write reports about observations they made at the crime scenes, and create investigative efforts in the same. Upon creation, these reports are taken to law enforcement agencies for more investigations (Pepper, 2010). Crime Scene Investigators also have the responsibility of inspecting scenes of crime where burglaries, armed robberies, murders, invasions and sexual assaults have occurred. They do this by both processing and packaging physical evidence, briefing agencies of law enforcement and photographing autopsies (Chisum & Turvey, 2011). Ways of protecting evidence There are numerous ways in which crime scene investigators can protect evidence. Firstly, they can do this by calling for medical help, or offering the required first aid to any injured persons (Chisum & Turvey, 2011). This is important since the injured persons may be the main source of evidence, hence providing medical help will......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Criminal Justice

...Crime victims rights Advocates for victims' rights have long complained that they have been sidelined by a criminal justice system that is focused on the interplay between the state and the defendant. With the enactment of the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008, that is changing. The authors examine the current state of victims' rights, the evolution of the enforcement mechanisms, and the emerging role of the criminal practitioner in regards to these rights. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Advocates for victims' rights have long complained that they have been sidelined by a criminal justice system that is focused on the interplay between the state and the defendant. With the enactment of the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008, that is changing. The authors examine the current state of victims' rights, the evolution of the enforcement mechanisms, and the emerging role of the criminal practitioner in regards to these rights. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,......

Words: 5571 - Pages: 23

Criminal Justice

...Juvenile Delinquency A paper submitted to Webber International University In partial fulfillment for the Masters degree in criminal justice By: Jayla Phillips Date: November 20, 2014 Course: Intro to Criminal Justice Semester: Fall 2014 Instructor: Dr. Peter Barone Jamaica’s juvenile law deals with three categories of the ages up to 17 years old. There are some juveniles that get into trouble that are in need of care and protection, those that are beyond control, and those 8 years of age and over who commit offenses against the law (Bynum, 2010). There are kids who are abused and just run away from home and when the system gets to them, there are put down as a juvenile because they ran away but they are put on protection from their parents or their guardian. Jamaica's domestic law and international legal commitments appear to guarantee children some of the rights required by international standards for the protection of minors. Yet social, economic, and political factors-rooted in Jamaican history and the influence of contemporary trends-often combine to subvert many of these standards (watch, 2014). Poland a juvenile was a person who had committed an offence before having reached 17 years of age. Juveniles who had committed an offence prior to his or her 13th birthday could not be accountable for their illegal actions (Observatory, 2014). Most kids in Poland are not reliable to be committed to a crime because they are not over the age of 13 years of......

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Criminal Justices

...CRIMINAL JUSTICE Name Institution Course Date Explain how the various aspects of criminal justice relate to one another through a discussion of the criminal justice process and agencies involved in this process. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your points. Criminal equity process differs from state to state, and the government criminal equity framework has its guidelines, techniques, and terms to portray the procedures' phases. Crime obviously, there has to be the person involved in committing the offence, and the criminal equity system starts with the commission of wrongdoing. For instance, theft happens when a man takes property from its owner with the purpose to deny the property's owner the right to have the property. (Smartt, 2010) People involved in the crime have to report the crime to the police. Investigation police are deeply involved in this stage. Search Warrant, if instigating officer’s trust there's proof of wrongdoing at a particular area, they may attempt to get a court order permitting them to seek the premises. Interrogation Law authorization officers can examine witnesses, and even question potential suspects, the length of their sacred rights are secured. After a criminal offence has been reported, the police officer has to conduct an investigation to determine whether the act was illegal or not illegal. (Sales, 2008) If the crime was illegal, an arrest warrant is commanded for the suspect to be arrest and taken to the crown......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Criminal Justice

...What shows do you watch and why? I have been interested in Criminal Justice my whole life because I have a family member in Law Enforcement. I watch Cops, Alaska State Troopers, and Jail. I watch these shows because it teaches what the police go through and how a suspect acts. It also teaches how an officer handles a certain situation. Cops and Alaska State Troopers can also show how to investigate a crime scene. While watching these shows, I learn what my rights are and when an officer is in the right or wrong. Why are so many people entertained by murder, the criminal mind, detective work, courtroom trials, forensic science, and the like? People are entertained in these such shows for many reasons. One of the reasons is that these types are like mysteries that eventually get solved. The people that watch these shows like to try and “solve” the cases alongside the detectives or the FBI. People like these types of shows because the show will keep them on the edge of their seats and get the people involved from beginning to end. The people that watch these shows also get to see high speed chases. What perceptions of the criminal justice system do you believe people have learned from watching these shows? I believe that people have learned the CSI effect from watching these shows. The CSI effect is when the show is an exaggerated portrayal of what the real case may have been. It also influences the public to watch these shows more....

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Criminal Justice

...early 20th century when it was recognized that children and adults are different, and the rehabilitation process for them should be different as well. Until the late 19th century children and adults where tried alike in criminal courts. When a juvenile offender commits a crime it is the responsibility of the state to rehabilitate the juvenile offenders, as well as protect them. Youth crime rates have actually declined over the past twenty years, despite the public’s perception that it has increased. This has led to an overwhelming support that the juvenile court system be restructured to include tougher crime punishment, such as being able to try children as adults. This belief is that children are able to commit the same crimes as adults, and why should they be treated any different. Take for instance that if an adult commits a murder they will likely be in prison for the rest of their life, whereas a child or youth offender would likely be out by the time they are twenty one. Juvenile and criminal courts have many differences but the most outstanding is that juvenile courts tend to focus on the offender rather than the crime itself. Juvenile court is long believed to focus on the rehabilitation of the offender, as opposed to the focus of the crime as in criminal court. With rehabilitation in mind this gives the court much more leniency and flexibility, with options as far as punishment goes to the judge. The main concern in the public’s eye is the effectiveness of the......

Words: 1130 - Pages: 5

Criminal Justice

...Juvenile and Adult Courts Resha Harris CJA/374 June, 7, 2012 Tim, Tyler Juvenile and Adult Courts The juvenile Justice system has changed over time and continues to evolve with many policy changes taking place in the juvenile justice system. On July, 1, 1989 the juvenile court pass a law in the way juvenile are handle in the courts. Juveniles were placed inside institutions and other reform schools to determine if they would have positive impact on their lives in helping to make better decisions and choices. When a juvenile violate a criminal act a prosecutor or probation officer has the right to file a civil petition on the minor. They can also ask the court to determine that the minor is delinquent (Michon, n.d). A probation officer and prosecutor can both file a civil petition on a juvenile to get a criminal case started in juvenile court. The juvenile justice system is different from the adult justice system. Juvenile court deals with minors who violated a criminal statute. These proceedings are civil as opposed to criminal. Therefore, a juvenile cannot be charge with a crime. They can be accused of committing a delinquent act. If the charges of a juvenile are proven and a delinquency decision is made, the juvenile offender can be placed under the court broad powers. Broad powers mean that the courts can make the right decision for the juvenile. For example; if the courts has legal custody over the juvenile they can retain he or she until they become an......

Words: 459 - Pages: 2