Free Essay

Wielder of the Gun

In: English and Literature

Submitted By lc21
Words 1537
Pages 7
Wielder of the Gun
By
LaMerrence Edgeston

A weapon can be used to do many things. Usually when you hear the word weapon, you would think of something that would harm you. In one way you would be right. In another way you could be wrong. Just because the tool is a weapon doesn’t mean the wielder will or can use it as a weapon. Confuse? That’s ok I’ll I explain. The person that wields the weapon can decide to kill or just disarm. It has been said that it’s not the weapon that makes the killer but the spirt of he that wields it. The weapon that I will take about is that of the gun. A weapon that everyone is familiar with and can use it. A gun is usually the type of weapon that is use in different types of situations. A gun is sometimes a weapon that is use for killing. Then the next question would be to kill who? Well my answer to that is whoever it is pointed to. Since the gun is pointed at you. Your first thought is that the person will shoot me. Well who is the person that is holding the gun and who is the person that the gun is been pointed at? Well that question can have many answers. So let’s start it off with the police with the gun. The job of the police is to serve and protect. Well how can you protect if you always kill. Law Enforcement is going through a change. Certain people that have power are misusing the power. So what is this power? The power that they use is a badge and the uniform. People that have those two things think they can do whatever they want. Who are the people you asked? Good question. They are people like you and me. The difference is that they carry a big responsibility. I believe you heard the saying “With great power comes great responsibility.” (Ben Parker Spider-Man) This might be just a line out of a movie or comic book, but it has a powerful meaning. Responsibility is a word that is taught to us when we were little. So the word and its meaning has not change. Unfortunately for the ones with that responsibility does not understand or care. With that said the things that have been done by people with this burden cannot be over looked. We as the people have a power as well. It is equal in power to the law enforcement, but can be greater. How? Easy! By not staying quiet! We have always talked about how things use it be and what should or could be change. That’s all good and fine, but talking among ourselves won’t change a thing unless we come together to show and tell what needs to be done. With that look on your face I take it that you are not convince. That’s ok. Allow me to show and tell you examples of law enforcement’s change. I’ll be addressing three things. The three things are: how police can enter in a person’s house with a warrant, how with the police having a gun is there only way to protect them, and how it would feel to be the one that the gun is been pointed at. Once I’m done with these three reasons for change you deiced what shoot hits your heart if not all.
The first of the three reason is how a police officer can enter in a person’s without a warrant. An officer must have a warrant before entering a person’s house. If the officer asked if he/she can enter your home. You are allowed to say NO. Know you’re like Wow! Really! Well yes. The officer can asked and if the officer is turned down then the next step should be that the officer go get a warrant instead of forcing their way in. One example is that a man at his house was being visited by an office and the officer forces his way in the house. The man is asking in fear and confusing, what have I done? Why are you doing? With all the question flying around all the officer is saying is be quite or I will shoot. The whole ordeal was video by someone that was there. The video itself is evidence that the officer is using his power to do as he wish. Well then the questions would be what is the officer’s reason, what was it that the man did to be visited by the officer? All good questions that don’t have answers.
The second reason for change is when the police thinks that a gun is their only protection. An office ca carry a gun, but knowing how and when to use it is a complete different story. When an officer is handle a case depending on what it is about depends on if the office should use less-lethal or lethal force. At times the office must use lethal force, but there are times when they do not. Since when has a gun really solve a problem. An office life can be dangerous and you never know what might happen. So let me ask this. When dose have a title like Neighborhood Watch gives you the right to suspect someone then at the end the suspect is killed because you feel threated for your life. If this sounds familiar I’m talking about the Trayvon Martin case. Just because of looks his life came to an end. The person responsible for it was not charge right away, but was finally done. All that shows is that by you looking like someone on the run or in the wrong place at the wrong time you are the criminal. Another incent that actually involve an office and others is that an officer is pointing his gun at an army soldier. The soldier is recording what is happening to him and his friend. On the video the soldier’s is laying down on the ground hands over his head. The soldier is asking why he must lay on the ground if he does not have to. He has done nothing wrong and yet the gun is point at a unarm man. While he is still trying to figure out why another office comes to the scene and just pull his gun out and the video ends. I believe the solider and his friend is still alive, but was scared for their life. So tell me why the training in the academy is not being use. The academy is to teach you when you should use lethal force. The training is something you don’t forget. It is something that can save your life and make you a better person. With this happening how should I ensure that the training is being use for the each case? Well that could be answered by y third reason or by you the reader.
The last reason is what it is like to have the roles changed. It’s plain to see if a person is holding someone by gun is probably in control. Why is that? Good question. The unarm person has nothing to defend themselves with so fear and anxiety takes over. So I’m I saying that police uses this some method. You tell me how you would feel if a gun is pointed at you. Then again it might never have happen to you. The training probably teaching how you can disarm an armed person. If so then the training should also teach how to approach people. So if the gun is turn on an officer that is disarm then the officer should use the training and experience has taught them. So let me ask when is it right to take someone’s life? Well it’s never. In the army you are taught to fight for your people and country. In war you are taught to kill or be killed, but does that make it right it’s still not, but it happen. He same can be said to and office, but tell me how make lives does it take for you to sleep at night. So yes the office has hard times, but can still change the outcome unlike the war zoon a solider face.
All in a nut shell , the things showed and tell shows how law enforcement has change. How the office can enter in your home with a warrant , how the gun can be there only protect , and how it is like to have the roles change. With this you can see that much has to be change and not overlooked. The people that have being lose do to things that people say and what has happen because of an office can not be change now. All tha can be done is to stop it from happening again. The things that has happen can always teach us what it is like to be one as people. Hopefully this has shade some light of things happening and are still happening. Also you see how the wielder of the gun can change and what can actually happen with this change.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Texas and Washington State COM/220 March 31, 2010 Gun Control Texas and Washington State Many people do not know that 67% of all homicides in Texas were caused by firearms and 56% in Washington State? This is why, not only in these two states but the entire country, has debated countless years over the controversial issues of gun control and the laws. In the comparison and contrast in gun control stances in Texas and Washington State, the attitudes are very similar. It will discuss and cover many views and will teach about each states laws, statistics and stance on the gun control issue. These issues will be viewed side by side in comparison and contrast with each other to see all the facts. This way you will be able to decide your stance for yourself in the infamous controversial gun control issue. Washington State’s stance on gun control is in support of the gun owner and carrier and allows the owners to have numerous freedoms in owning and carrying guns. The stance against gun control is about 70% and lots of gun owners would like to keep the freedoms they already have. As RCW 9.41.050 states “Except in the person's place of abode or fixed place of business, a person shall not carry a pistol concealed on his or her person without a license to carry a concealed pistol” (Washington State Legislator, 2010). What this means to not just legal gun owners, but to anyone who possess a firearm, is that they are able to legally open carry......

Words: 2304 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Gun Laws and Gun Control

...The debate on whether or not citizens of the United States should legally possess a gun has been an issue present all throughout history. With the ongoing violence and crime involving guns, may people, including political figures, believe stricter laws on guns will lower the rate of gun related violence. But who should be the one to determine these laws? Who is to say these laws and bans would even work? Each state has their own individual law when it comes to owning a gun. Should each state continue to have their laws, or should the government set a national law regarding the ownership of guns? If these said laws were to take effect, would those committing these acts of gun crime obey, or continue to wreak havoc? Which raises another important question; instead of the laws on guns themselves being more firm, what about the sentencing to those who use the weapon in order to harm other citizens? Would a harsher sentencing for gun crimes lower their rate, or simply be another consequence these criminals just deal with? Gun related violence is a rising issue in America. Putting a ban, or even limitations, on guns owned my citizens would do more harm than good. Many anti-gun groups, like the ones in Connecticut, have succeeded in passing a law that will reduce the amount of ammunition held inside a gun’s magazine. Since the passing of this law, the debate on whether it will bring positive or negative repercussions has been at a constant. The law came into play due to the...

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Argumentative Essay against Gun Control Since 1980, forty-four states have passed laws allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection. (Five additional states had these laws before 1980. Illinois is the sole holdout.) A federal ban on the possession, transfer, or manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons, passed in 1994, was allowed to expire in 2004. In 2005, Florida passed the Stand Your Ground law, an extension of the so-called castle doctrine, exonerating from prosecution citizens who use deadly force when confronted by an assailant, even if they could have retreated safely; Stand Your Ground laws expand that protection outside the home to any place that an individual “has a right to be.” Twenty-four states have passed similar laws. Guns, therefore, are necessary in today's society for our protection There is no point to implement gun control considering the reality that criminals will still find a way to procure guns if they want to do so. Criminals will always make sure to have access to the guns that they need to execute their crimes successfully. They usually have connections to other influential people that can provide them with the guns and weapons that they need in order to execute their crimes. The bottom line is that if the criminals want to have access to guns, they will be able to get them even if there is a gun control policy in place. This law will not......

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Crime and Guns

...Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.  Guns are extremely powerful weapons. They can cause destruction, harm or even death. They can be used to defend and protect or to threaten and kill. Any way you look at it, guns are powerful tools, not only physically but socially. As college students it is important to stay abreast of the current events and issues circulating our country today, one of which is the controversial issue of gun control. It is extremely important to pay attention to where gun control laws are headed. The directions they take not only affect our nation and society but our future as well as we all move to communities and begin to raise families.  So why is gun control such a hot debate? Perhaps to answer this question it would be important to look at some key statistics concerning handguns in our society.......

Words: 2118 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Political Science 1333 Dr. Garrison December 3rd, 2009 The Gun Control Debate Gun control and the supposed right to a gun have been at the war for many decades. The term gun control refers to policies which seek to regulate the manufacture, sale, ownership, and the use of guns. These policies or the lack there of, are reinforced and intensified ever so often when an unfortunate tragedy occurs. For instance, after the April 16th, 2007 massacre at Virginia Tech University, in which left thirty-three persons including the gunman died, many persons were of the opinion that such an incident could have been avoided through effective gun control measures. However, the issue of gun control is a very sensitive topic in the American society. Many Americans view control gun legislation and policies as an attempt to refute and violate a constitutionally enshrined liberty, which guarantees them a right to own a gun. This liberty to own and possess firearms stems from the Second Amendment which many believe affords the ordinary citizen the right to be armed. On the contrary, there is the other sector of American society who argues that the Second Amendment does not afford or protect and such a right. Moreover, members of this group also argue that if the Constitution does in fact afford such a right it needs to be revisited or repealed since it is not applicable to the present American society. Both sides of the spectrum are heavily......

Words: 4741 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control Gun control is one of the controversial issues in the United States of America, especially after the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King. In some parts of America living with a gun is not only a right but also a culture. But for many others it is a threat and a source of insecurity. I am part of the latter and hope to see gun free America. In real world there ups and downs, there are moments of pleasure as well as discomfort. This is fact of life. Crimes are committed not only by criminals but by anyone who couldn’t restrain his anger during interaction in day to day life. At this moment it is not the same to be with a gun and without. As a human being there are moments when things are beyond our control and forced us to take serious measures against others. During this moment if a person is unable to restrain his emotion, carrying a gun will push him to commit a crime which he has never been intended. Bearing gun is a right as it is written in the Second Amendment of United States constitution; however, how this can be reconciled if it is a threat to the majority of Americans is a legitimate question. Guns exact a huge toll on America's children and youth, both in terms of lives lost and in terms of quality of life. Study shows that for black families, the chance of their male children dying from a gunshot wound is 62% higher than the chance of dying in a motor vehicle crash. For Hispanics, the chance of dying by...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gun Control

...The Deadly Date The Deadly Debate Gun Control has been at the forefront of many debates due to the increase of deadly shootings. Over the past several years, there have been multiple mass casualty shootings, and as the number of shootings increased, United States citizens began the debate of whether tighter gun control laws would prevent these shootings. In this debate, we will address the reasons supporting gun control and the reasons opposing gun control. Americans have a choice and this choice will be debated below. America was founded on the principle of freedom and the rights of an individual to live in a nation built by the people, for the people. The government has begun to use tragedy, terrorism and civil unrest to force unjustified laws and federal controls into action that are a direct attack on our civil liberties. The NSA and other federal organizations have violated Americans rights and freedom in the name of national security far too many times. If we allow the government to take away our rights to bear arms it will be another tragedy in the long list of attacks on our American rights. Many gun control activists believe that reducing the number of private gun owners in America will reduce crime and suicide. This could not be further from the truth; strict gun laws will only take the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens, criminals will be armed and normal citizens will have no means of immediate protection. A recent study conducted by......

Words: 1987 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Guns

...Gun Control- Pro Gun control is the control of firearms so that crime will go down. Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Most of these, 67 percent or 10,886 were committed with firearms. Even though people have the right to bear arms, as said in The Bill of Rights, there should be laws in place to limit the amount and types of firearms people can own. (www.justthefacts.com) Crime rates in the United States are way too high with most crimes such as robberies, assaults, and murders being committed with a gun. Kids have easy access to most guns that are in the house because they are not properly locked away. Kids may be interested in how the gun works and do not properly know how to use it. Some sort of accident happens where it fires and possibly kills someone . In 1994 Governor Weld of Massachusetts signed a law that banned handguns for anyone under the age of 21.The crime rate in Boston decreased . There needs to be laws in place to restrict the availability and types of guns that are legal to regular citizens. (www.proquest.com) www.youdebate.com). Gun Control relates to governmental issues because of the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. There are two Principles of Democracy that gun control directly is related to, first is Individual Rights and Freedoms because it is a persons right to own any firearm that they so please. It also involves Limited Government. Many people will argue that people have the 2nd Amendment......

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Yao Gun

...Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun Rock n roll in China is called Yao Gun...

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Guns

...Reflection Joe Nocera argues in his New York Times op-ed column “Guns and Mental Illness” that it should be more difficult for people, rather than the mentally-ill, to attain a firearm due to a recent mass shooting in California. Last month, 22-year-old Elliot Rodger went on a shooting spree in Isla Vista, California after emailing a 140-page manifesto to his parents. Nocera recapitulates the terrifying tale of two parents racing to California only to have their worst fears confirmed: Elliot had killed six people before committing suicide from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Elliot had a long history with depression and had never been admitted to a psychiatric facility. It is unclear whether Elliot should have been admitted to a psychiatric clinic. In particular, Elliot did not have a criminal history. He was simply a sequestered adolescent with poor social skills. In other words, Elliot had a right to purchase a gun. Mass shooters tend to meet the profile of socially awkward males. Statistically, however, very few socially awkward males actually commit mass shootings. It would be unlawful to deny males who meet this profile access to a firearm. Indeed, Nocera notes that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1975 that mentally-ill people who are neither violent nor dangerous cannot be forced into an institution. Therefore, Nocera concludes that we should make it more difficult for everyone to attain a gun. The author has a clear liberal bias. The......

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gun Control

...& Ethics Professor Sandra White September 22, 2015 Week 5 On this day in the US, around thirty people will be killed with a gun, not including suicides.  Many more will be wounded.  I can safely predict this number because that is the average number of homicides committed with a gun in the US each day.  Such killings have become so routine that they are barely noticed even in the local news.  Only when a significant number of people are murdered, particularly when they include children or are killed randomly, is the event considered newsworthy. Yet efforts to regulate the possession of guns in the US are consistently defeated. The case for gun rights rests primarily on two claims, one about facts, the other about moral principle.  The claim about fact is that members of society as a whole are safer when more of them have guns, since potential aggressors are likelier to be deterred the more reasonable it is for them to believe that their potential victim is armed.  The claim about principle is that each person has a right of self-defense and that this right entails a further right not to be deprived of, or prevented from having, the most effective means of self-defense.  These claims are independent.  Most of those who assert them think the second would be true even if the first were false. Advocates of gun rights usually defend the claim about fact by appealing to statistics for example, those that suggest that when a city bans handguns, rates of......

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Gun Use

...people be allowed to carry gun for self-defence? The function of gun has been a heat discussion since gun had been created. There are people suggested that guns should be used as self-defence and individuals should be allowed to carry guns. Around the world today, there are countries that people can own gun lawfully and there are some that strictly control gun. It seems true that gun can protect people as well as their properties since gun has the power to cause huge damage in the blink of an eye, but we cannot deny the fact that gun is dangerous and has massive potential threat. With a gun, a person can easily injured and even killed others without much difficulties. People carrying guns might also has negative influence on the whole society and the security of individuals. As everything has its two sides, should people be allowed to carry gun for self-defence is always a controversial topic. In my point of view, I believe that people own gun has more drawbacks than advantages. Gun is famous for its massive lethality and is known as one of the most deadly weapons on earth. It is originally created for killing but not defence. Some people argued that carrying gun for self-defence should be allowed since gun has high efficiency and can cause injury in just a second. With a gun, the possibility of successfully saving and defencing yourself would be much higher. It is an undeniable fact that gun at some level does give people a scene of secure, but can gun protect everybody......

Words: 998 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gun Control

...Gun Control is when you keep firearms plus guns away from people. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Also when ever people hear the word gun, the thoughts are of violence and negativity. Many people, myself included think gun control is wrong because we know that it is not necessary, since we know that guns were not involved in many of the deaths caused each year. While many other people disagree and think it is good because of the safety for people. In this essay I will tell you why gun control is unnecessary and why there shouldn?t be any gun control at all. There have been many gun control laws established throughout the U.S., but they vary from state to state. For example, in Colorado you can purchase any type of gun: handgun, machine gun, shotgun, rifle, automatic rifle, etc. at the age of 18, while in other places you would need a hunting license.1 I think this is unfair because when I?m at the age of 18 I would want to buy a gun, but I can?t because I?m living in California and another 18 year old could in Colorado. Also, another example is that in some states, they allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, while in other states citizens can?t. I don?t think this is fair at all because I think they should make laws that suits the whole U.S., and not make different laws in......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Guns

...Statistics show that violence related to guns is the second-leading cause of teenage and young adult death in industrialized areas (Murnan, J., Dake, J A, & Price, J H 2004). What they don’t tell is the statistics for the amount of self defense and other non-violent cases are involved. Moorhouse and Wanner state that the rate of gun related homicide is over 50 percent but the variable to what the cause of the homicide is not present (Moorhouse and Wanner, 2006). FBI releases a report that gives these types of statistics, but they don’t tell you are the opposite of these. The amount of guns owned by Americans has increased 51% over the past two years, with this the total violent crime has decreased 21%, the murder has decreased 28%, the amount of robberies has decreased 43%, and the amount of aggravated assaults have decreased 13% (National Rifle Association, 2008). Even though most homicidal violence is caused by firearms, not all deaths are related to the misuse of firearms. Which is why I don't believe that it is fair to take people’s right to bear arms because it is a constitutional right as well as personal protection. Every family has at least one member that owns a firearm of some sort based on statistics. Some are used for sport and some for protection. I believe the biggest role of a firearm is personal protection. According to the National Rifle Association 76% of all Americans fall victim to some sort of violent crime at least once in their lifetimes......

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Guns

...A Rebuttal of Gun Control What would be going through your mind if you were at your barber and a deranged man came in and began pointing a gun at others and you. You have your 5 year old son with you? Would you be thinking if they would ban guns this would have never happened? Probably not! What you were probably thinking is if I had a gun on me I could protect not only my own lift but also my sons life and the people around me. People are starting to see a gun as an object of death and destruction, and not what they are intended to be. There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm than good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. “Guns are a part of America’s way of life. Today many people are under the impression that guns are the root of all that is evil.” (Patton, 2011). Who would be the person that would save a lady that was being raped? Probably someone who owns a gun and its use is not intended for evil, or what about someone that is breaking into your home? Who is the person that will save the day? Once again probably someone who owns a gun and it is not intended for the use of evil but more for the purposes of eliminating the evil. Those......

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6