Free Essay

Turks and Kurds

In: Historical Events

Submitted By viperzjaws
Words 2345
Pages 10
Turks and Kurds
Pirzada Osama
Turkish policies of repression against the Kurds were one of the strongest and most lasting arguments against admitting Turkey to membership in the European Union. Turkey's application to the European Union is still pending and is soon to be reviewed again.
Support for a United States invasion of Iraq may bring the Turks billions in aid, but it may also give them the much costlier choice between losing any chance for membership in the European Union and tolerating a secessionist movement in the Turkish parts of Kurdistan, which could endanger the very existence of Turkey in its present form.

Kurdish lands, rich in natural resources, have always sustained and promoted a large population. While registering modest gains since the late 19th century, but particularly in the first decade of the 20th, Kurds lost demographic ground relative to neighboring ethnic groups. This was due as much to their less developed economy and health care system as it was to direct massacres, deportations, famines, etc. The total number of Kurds actually decreased in this period, while every other major ethnic group in the area boomed. Since the middle of the 1960s this negative demographic trend has reversed, and Kurds are steadily regaining the demographic position of importance that they traditionally held, representing 15% of the over-all population of the Middle East in Asia-a phenomenon common since at least the 4th millennium BC.
Today Kurds are the fourth largest ethnic group in the Middle East, after the Arabs, Persians and Turks. Their largest concentrations are now respectively in Turkey (approx. 52% of all Kurds), Iran(25.5%), Iraq (16%), Syria (5%) and the CIS (1.5%). Barring a catastrophe, Kurds will become the third most populous ethnic group in the Middle East by the year 2000, displacing the Turks. F
. . .
In other words, it is Islam versus secularism. With very few exceptions, an occasional article in the New York Times, this is how the debate about Turkey is being carried out in the Unites States. Such debate, however, presented in terms of (bad) Islam versus (good) secularism is not just misleading, but represents gross distortion of the situation in Turkey.
The Turkish military has been trying to find out ways to get rid of Necmettin Erbakan and his Islamic Refah party since he came to power a little over a year ago. There has already been a mini coup in Turkey at the end of last February, when the army-dominated National Security Council issued an ultimatum to Erbakan to stop the Islamization of Turkish society. Certainly, in a real democracy the army does not issue ultimatums to the elected government, but this is necessary we are told, because in Turkey the army is the guarantor of the country's secular orientation.
Both Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Hafez al Assad in Syria are followers of the Baathist ideology, a mixture of secularism, Arab nationalism and socialism. Iraq and Syria, however, are hardly qualified as democracies just because they follow a secular ideology, which, one should add, has been increasingly accommodating Islam. But there is deliberate confusion in Washington over Turkish secularism and for some time now, the Clinton Administration is trying to convince itself and the rest of us that Turkey is a democracy. At the same time, the Turkish ruling elite led by the military likes to call Turkey a "secular democracy" but democracy in Turkey has been moving backwards for several years now. There are enlightened Turks however, who realize that the country is in regression and who call the prevailing system of government "semi-democracy" at best.
The most serious of the multifaceted crises faced by Turkey today, is the Kurdish question. Rather than accommodate the legitimate aspirations for human and cultural rights of 14 million Kurdish citizens, the Turkish government has opted to solve the Kurdish question by force. The last three years alone, Turkey spent over 20 billion dollars fighting the Kurdish separatists. For over a month now, 50,000 Turkish troops have invaded Iraq and are engaged in fighting Kurdish guerrillas. This 13-year-old civil war between the Turkish army and the Kurds has become Turkey's Vietnam. Its staggering cost already exceeds 50 billion dollars and is dragging down the Turkish economy. There is also the tragic human dimension of this civil war. There are over 23,000 dead. The Turkish army has razed to the ground over 2,000 Kurdish villages and about 2 million Kurds were removed forcibly from their homes and submerged into utter poverty into shantytowns across Turkey. These Kurdish refugees, have no hope and no means to express their aspirations politically. Kurdish political parties are suppressed and their leaders, some members of Parliament, are in jail.
Why Has the Kurdish Resistance Movement Been Unsuccessful to Date?
The twentieth century has witnessed the downfall of the worldwide system of colonialism and the foundation of new states in former colonies and dependent countries. Why have the Kurds, with their long history and a rich culture, not attained their freedom, even though they have continually waged resistance since the beginning of the nineteenth century and paid a high price for it?
There are both internal and external reasons for this. The feudal fragmentation within Kurdish society is one such internal reason. The tribal social structure, divisions between religious movements and confessions, and the institutions of large-scale land ownership and the sheikdom have always been obstacles to the unification of national forces. The medieval value structure of this system has resulted in the fact that a national consciousness has arisen only in part.
But these are not the essential reasons. We must not forget that many nations in Asia and Africa that have won their freedom have been backward with respect to their economic and social systems, in many cases even more backward than the Kurds. The true reasons that have prevented the Kurdish national movement from succeeding are external ones.
Initially the Kurds fought against two great empires, the Ottoman and the Persian Empires. The balance of power was not in favor of the Kurds, and they had no external support whatsoever. But the Balkan countries, for example, attained their independence through the support of powerful Western states such as Russia, Austria, England, and France. It was the English and the French that separated Arabia from the Ottoman Empire. These were the same powers that, in cooperation with the government in Ankara, carved up Kurdistan once again.
The Kurdish rebellions that followed World War I were opposed not only by Turkey and Iran but also by the French and the English, which had Syria and Iraq as part of their mandates. The English in particular used their own forces to put down the Kurdish national rebellion in Iraq.
After Syria and Iraq had gained their independence, the Kurdish national movement faced the alliance of these four states. One of the most detrimental effects of the division is that the territory of Kurdistan is surrounded by these four dividing states, i.e. by enemy forces. The Kurds have no connections with the outside world, either via land or sea. It is very difficult to set up contacts with the outside world. Even if friendly forces did exist which wanted to help the Kurds from the outside, there are no routes or points of access through which this support could reach Kurdistan directly. If the Kurdish national movement begins an armed rebellion in any of the parts of Kurdistan, it therefore requests a neighboring country to provide the necessary base areas or logistic support. But this neighboring country is still one of the four states that hold another part of Kurdistan in its control. None of them is interested in a Kurdish victory. These states merely play the Kurdish card against each other when they have problems with one another from time to time. This makes the Kurdish question, which is already complicated enough, even more complicated. Such relations are extremely problematic for the Kurdish national movement and occasionally bring Kurdish organizations into a situation where they are fighting against one another.
Aside from this, the Kurdish national movement has never received any substantial international support. The basic reason for this is that large and small states that are not directly involved in this issue put their own interests in the foreground and do not want to take a position that is opposed to the four states of the region (Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria).

What Is the Solution?
The Kurdish national movement has not been successful, for all of the reasons named above. On the other hand, the four states in question have not succeeded in their efforts to melt down the Kurds through assimilation or to eliminate them. On the contrary, Kurdish national consciousness has strengthened from year to year, overcome certain feudal obstacles, and acquired the character of a mass movement. The Kurdish national movement has organized itself and now includes all social classes and levels. Kurds in the various parts of Kurdistan have moved closer together. In all of these countries, Kurdish resistance has grown stronger; in the three largest parts of Kurdistan it has taken on the form of armed resistance which it has simply been impossible to eradicate.
It has also cost the oppressive countries dearly to deny Kurdish identity, deprive Kurds of their rights, and implement a policy of oppression against them. The governments of Turkey, Iraq, and Iran are compelled to wage continual war. This war consumes their financial resources and costs them human lives. In this respect Iraq, which has to deal with a de facto partition, is the most interesting example. But the situation in Turkey is no more rosy than it is in Iraq.
For Turkey, the policy of oppression against the Kurds is the greatest obstacle to democracy and domestic peace. One of the main causes of the frequent military coups in Turkey is the Kurdish question. The dirty war that has been waged for 11 years against the Kurdish people is consuming resources. Turkey's direct expenditures for the war amount to between 8 and 10 billion US dollars annually. The economy of Kurdistan has been totally crippled; agriculture, trade, and animal husbandry have collapsed.
A point has been reached at which the Kurdish question has precipitated a serious economic and political crisis in Turkey. Violence stretches over the entire social life of the country like a net. Chauvinistic nationalism and militarism are intensifying.
The government and official spokesman continue to blame the PKK - the so-called "handful of terrorists" - for the miserable situation. But the main responsibility of the present misery and all the suffering that has been inflicted on both peoples must be borne by the Turkish state itself. The point that has been reached today is the result of a wrong-headed policy that has been implemented for seventy years.
There is no doubt that this problem can not be solved by the army or the police. A peaceful solution is possible through dialogue and the recognition of Kurdish rights, and this is in the interests of both peoples. Thus peace and democracy could move into the country, and Turkey as a whole and Kurdistan in particular could enter into a phase of development.
During recent years, groups of reasonable people have been increasingly criticizing the policy that has been followed so intensely for the past seventy years, which has brought nothing to anybody and led the country ever deeper into an impasse. They have committed themselves to a peaceful solution. Groups of businessmen and workers, intellectuals and the media are increasingly allying themselves with this point of view. The international situation is also forcing Turkey toward a change of course.
In recent years, the Kurdish question has developed from a regional problem into an international one. In this connection, the UN resolution to protect the Iraqi Kurds is extremely significant. Turkey, which wants to be accepted into the European Union, must adapt its political and cultural life to European standards, and put into practical effect the international treaties which it has signed.
The conclusion I have reached on the basis of all I have presented so far is that the solution of the Kurdish question, despite the unfavorable present situation, is moving closer. In order to make a peaceful solution possible as soon as possible, the peace initiatives at the national and international levels must be strengthened.
The Socialist Party of Kurdistan, of which I am a member, advocates a peaceful and just solution. Despite all the oppression and provocations to which the Kurdish people has been subjected and is still being subjected, we have opted from the very beginning for political and peaceful methods of struggle. In our opinion, the peaceful coexistence of both peoples is possible, and therefore our party proposes a federation. We can find solutions that are similar to those developed in Spain, Belgium, or Switzerland. The same demands that Turkey is making for the hundred thousand Turks on Cyprus, it should also grant within its own borders to the Kurdish nation with its 20 million people.
But for this to happen, first of all there must be a bilateral ceasefire and negotiations must be initiated.
In our view, a peaceful solution to the problem is also possible in the other parts of Kurdistan. In all parts of Kurdistan, the existence and rights of the Kurdish people must be respected. Federal solutions based on equal rights must be devised.
The question of the unity of the Kurdish nation is a question of the future. I believe that the Middle East region will experience great changes in the future, as other regions have done. The despotic, oppressive, and primitive regimes of today will go, relations between the peoples of the region will improve, and there will be a phase of rapprochement, as is happening now in Europe. The borders will lose their significance. Artificial borders, which today divide Kurdistan with barbed wire and land mines, will then also disappear.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Media Reporting of Terrorist Activities 10312011

...group established during the Cold War with the aim of fulfilling a nationalist dream” (para. 5). The public made an exhibition of their discontent by having protests in western Turkey after the violent deaths of 24 Turkish soldiers in mid-October 2011 (Bajalan, 2011). At the same time in Kurdish demonstrators also took to the streets to show their discontent by providing support to the PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan and militia in the mountains. Bajalan (2011), “In 2009 when a group of PKK activists descended from their mountain camps in response to government calls for peace, they were greeted by Kurds on the Iraqi-Turkish border as heroes” (Armed struggle). This separation has further split the Kurds and Turks clearly showing conflict within the nation. However, the more the government claims the group is not a representative to the Turkish, the further skeptics disagree. Many Turks believe that the PKK is an abomination and do not comprehend the reasons that someone could support the group. However, in Hakkari found near the borders of Iran and Iraq, several citizens show support for the PKK organization opposing the stance of the government. The patriarchal attitude of the government toward the Kurdish still thwarts the government’s plans for independence, especially after 2009 when the AKP became aware that the Democratic Society Party (DTP) supports the PKK organization. Although recent elections show a decline in government support indicative of local support......

Words: 1183 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ottoman Turk

...and British armies took over the Middle East and slit it into colonies, even though they were referred to as ‘mandates’ to defend the rise of anti-colonialist sentiment. Anatolia was the only thing that remained, but it was also in danger of being segmented to different contenders. It was only military resistance that was not expected of a group of displeased officers of Ottoman army that was led by the astonishing Mustafa Kemal, later known as Atatur, which saved the day. But Kemal was not very much interested in the Empire’s rescue. On the contrary, he was willing to create a modern state that would substitute a defeated empire whose leaders had revealed their inability to adequately respond to European imperialism. Therefore it was a Turk, who brought about the close of the Ottoman Empire. Under the leadership of Ataturk, the Grand National Assembly canceled the sultanate in 1922 and the new Republic of Turkey was declared in 1923. When matching onto the battlefield the janissary with his crashing cymbals was the terror of Christendom. Compared to European military forces, the janissary corps was ideally disciplined; it was even noted that when janissaries bowed their heads at the same time, they resembled a field of ripe corn rippling in the breeze. The janissary seemed to personalize everything that was and is still believed to account for the grandeur of the Ottomans in their pride in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The janissary was well-trained and was......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Day in the Life of a Kurd

...A Day in the Life of the Kurd A Day in the Life of the Kurd Kurds are a pastoral nomadic culture that can be considered patrilineal. Men herd the animals and lead the family. They are what hold the status of the family. Women play a smaller role in this society due to their beliefs that women are weak to temptations. Based off of their Quran and what it depicts, are how the Kurds lead their lives. It is a highly religious society that can be admired for sticking to their guns in the world of today. Kurdish traditionally led a peasant life, due to the nomadic state of being. Though they are nomadic, they do have boarders that fall along Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey. This mostly being because societies have sprouted up around them, thus caging them in. Extremely kind and generous they have never really belonged to anyone. “The language and traditions of the Kurds set them apart from other ethnic groups for the fact that they live in several different homogeneous nation-states.” (Gunter, Michael M (Dec 2012)). Some would say that the origins of the Kurds can be traced to the Medes, although there is no actual physical evidence of such. Being of a patrilineal lineage, the family centers around a male head and his immediate family. Depending on what type of nomads their family is, dictates what kind of patrilineal family they are. Xani is where the extended family lives under the same roof or in the family compound during their seasonal movement. ......

Words: 1908 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Key Issues in the International Relations Between Turkey and the Eu

... not the actual proofs. The most publicized are the difficult Turkey-Greece relations, especially their conflict over Cyprus, populated by both Turks and Greeks, and repressions imposed upon the Greek-Orthodox minority in Turkey due to that conflict. Turkish and Greek hostility and territorial disputes have lasted for decades, and although in the last years relations between the two countries have significantly improved with Greece being one of the key supporters of Turkish accession into EU, but there are still unresolved issues, like for example, the Turkish occupation of Cypriot vessels. There is also problem of Greek population in Turkey, claiming that their human rights are continually violated and cannot feel safe living there as Orthodox Christians. Another discriminated group are Kurds. They compose about 25% of the entire Turkish population and although they are distinct ethnic group, the state denies to recognize them as such. From 1930, Turkish government have tried to fully assimilate Kurds in Turkey by denying them rights to use their own language, and show other signs of their national and religious identity. The problem was recognized in reports of The European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance and other international institutions protecting human rights, agreeing that Turkish Constitution is against the Kurds. Also news media in Turkey are often subjected to political restraints and repressions. Their independence was never fully taken away, but......

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

General Motors

...I never knew any information about Turkey until I found this country on a world map. That’s when I learned the following facts: Turkey is located in both Europe and Asia, and it shares a border with Greece. So when I started taking the course Geography of the Middle East at Old Dominion University, I decided to select Turkey for my research paper. Perry Library and Larchmont Library were excellent places for literary materials. I also consulted Internet sources and my class textbook as additional resources. Turkistan, a region in central Asia, is a Persian term which means “Turks’ land” or “land of the Turks”. The Young Ottoman Turks considered this name for their country before they decided on “Turkiye, an adaptation of the European name” Turkey (Lewis 333). Although “[t]he name Turkey has been given to…Anatolia…since its first conquest by the Turks in the eleventh century,” the Turks officially referred to their country as Turkey when it won its independence in 1923. (Lewis 1). Turkey’s relative geographical position distinguished it from most of the other countries of the world. It is situated on two continents: (southeastern) Europe and (southwestern) Asia. European Turkey, or Eastern Thrace, constitutes only 3 percent of the country’s land area, and “[t]he other 97 percent…is…in Asia and is called Anatolia, or Asia Minor” (Orr 19; Sheehan 7). Turkey’s neighbors are Greece and Bulgaria to the northwest; Iran, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan to the......

Words: 4305 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Kurdistan

...the desire to create an independent Kurdish state has intensified and created conflicts between the Kurds and the modern states of Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria. The Kurds’ aspiration of creating a new ethnic state in the Middle East has only served to further destabilize an already unstable region. But to prevent future turmoil, the creation of a new nation-state could be a necessary precaution. The dream of a Kurdish homeland is an old one, but after thousands of years, whether or not it can be achieved remains far from certain. The Kurdish people represent a distinct ethnic population within the Middle East. Unlike most of their surrounding neighbors, they are of neither of Turkic nor Arabic descent (Global Security, “Kurdish Conflict”). They are ethnically and linguistically distant relatives of the neighboring Persians, but have for millennia have maintained a unique cultural identity inhabiting a area from the Zagros Mountains to the eastern Taurus Mountains and part of the Mesopotamian plain (Black). Though they can trace their origins in the region back over 25 centuries to the Empire of the Medes, the Kurds can claim only brief and scattered moments of independence (Global Security, “Kurdish Conflict”). One such moment occurred relatively recently gauged against this people’s ancient history. And because of the failure of that opportunity, the modern Kurds began a renewed fight for independence that continues today. At the end of World War I,......

Words: 2286 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Anthropology

...Golan Heights Haganah Hagar & her son Ishmael- Hamas Hamid Karzai Hassan Rouhani- Iran-Iraq War (1979-1989): Irgun Ka’ba- Kermit Roosevelt Khyber Pass massacre 1842 Killing the Israeli ambassador and his aides in London Kurds Lawrence of Arabia Levant- Lochay, Scotland The longest US war Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Manluks 1983 Marine HQ in Beirut   Mission Accomplished! Mohamed Bouazizi - Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Mohammed Mossadegh Mongols under Genghis Khan Muammar al-Gaddafi Muhammad Mujahedeen Munich Olympics in 1972 Muslim Brotherhood- Napoleon in the Middle East National Liberation Movement Nerve gas and the Kurds and Iranians Operation Ajax Operation Iraq Freedom Osama bin Laden Oslo Accords Ottoman Empire Palestine Palestine Liberation Organization Palestinian National Authority Peel Commission People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) Persian Empire Persian Gulf War 1991 Philip Augustus Plenary indulgences President Mubārak Raid on Etebbe Ramadan Richard I Saddam Hussein Saladin- Sayyid Qutb Sheik Emir Faisal Hussein Shi’a- Six-Day War in 1967 Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989) Suleiman I Sunni Sykes-Picot Agreement Taliban The USS Cole The volcano of the Middle East The Young Turks Theodor Herzl Tigris and Euphrates Rivers UN resolution 242 United Arab Republic (UAR) USA Patriot Act- W.K. D’Arcy- West Bank Yasir Arafat Yom Kippur War Zionism...

Words: 337 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Turkish and Kurdish Fertility in Turkey

...other statistical methods were utilized in order to illustrate convergence, which was theorized as (a) resulting from the delayed exposure of Turkey’s Kurds to the dynamics of modernization and (b) providing compelling evidence against the claim that Turks and Kurds belong to fundamentally different demographic regimes. One important form of divergence between these populations—bride’s age at first marriage—was acknowledged and related to a potential change in sexual economics among Turkish Kurds. Keywords: Turkish fertility; Kurdish fertility; Turkish fertility transition Turkish and Kurdish Fertility in Turkey: New Statistical Evidence for Convergence Introduction Although the overall fertility rate for Turkey has declined precipitously as part of the country’s demographic transition, perhaps the earliest in the Muslim Middle East (Angin & Shorter, 1998), there is a well-documented disparity between the fertility rates of ethnic Turkish and ethnic Kurdish women in Turkey (Işık & Pınarcıoğlu, 2006; Yüceşahin & Özgür, 2008). The following conclusion has been drawn from the data: “…strong demographic differences exist between Turkish and Kurdish-speaking populations…the convergence of the two groups does not appear to be a process under way. Turks and Kurds do indeed appear to be actors of different demographic regimes, at different stages of demographic and health transition processes” (Koç, Hancıoğlu,......

Words: 4118 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

The Kurds in Syria, a Struggle for Self-Determination

...The Kurds in Syria, a struggle for self-determination Thiebald WoudaS2556790IRIO Academic Skills 2Research PaperDrs. H. Sportel27-01-2014Amount of words used: 2378 | Table of Content Introduction________________________________________________________3 Chapter 1 Setting up an own state_______________________________________________5 Chapter 2 The Kurds in Syria and their claim for an own state_________________________7 Conclusion________________________________________________________10 Bibliography______________________________________________________11 Introduction The Kurds have always dreamed of their own state which they call Kurdistan. Kurdistan is located in the Middle-East and is divided over 4 countries: Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey. In 1920, the Kurds were close to establishing their own state because the foundation of a Kurdish state was mentioned in the Treaty of Sevres. However, after some discussion of other involving parties, the Treaty of Sevres was replaced in 1923 by the treaty of Lausanne, in which the Kurds were neglected. This excluded the establishment of a Kurdish state. Years of revolt went by and although the Kurds have tried to become independent, an own internationally recognized state was never established. Syria was no exception, the Kurds were suppressed by the Syrian government. For example on 23 august 1962, when as a result of a decision of the government, 120000 Kurds lost their Syrian citizenship. But then...

Words: 4066 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Ggg Guide

...border due to military occupation. * Pray for more of the Bible to be available in their language, and for Christian radio broadcasts in the Kumyk language. * Pray for Ukrainian missionaries to evangelize them. Day 17 Day 17 Yezidi Kurd of Ukraine Yezidis have been called the worshippers of the Devil. Because of their religious rites the Yezidis were despised by the rest of Kurds and lived in isolation. Kurds-Yezidis are a distinctive ethnic group. Their religion is based on Mazdeism, the dualistic religion of ancient Persians, which incorporates elements of Judaism and Christianity. Extensive resettlement of Kurds, from Kurdistan into Transcaucasia, started at the beginning of the 19th century, after the incorporation of Transcaucasia into Russia. Relations between the Kurds and the Persian and Turkish authorities had always been extremely bad, the Kurds were cruelly persecuted and exterminated by the thousand (a situation that has not improved even by the end of the 20th century), a situation which led some Kurdish tribes and smaller groups to try and find refuge in Russia. * Ask the Lord to call Ukrainians who are willing to share the Gospel with the Yezidi Kurds. * Ask God to give the Yezidi Kurd believers opportunities to share the love of Jesus with their own people. Day 18 Day 18 Increasingly we see God moving people groups away from their traditional homelands. For example, some of the Kyrgyz people of Kyrgyzstan who were......

Words: 6609 - Pages: 27

Free Essay

Does Your Country Have a “Race Issue”?

...your country have a “race issue”? The concept of race is an indicative of ignorant in based of to fear of someone that is different. Racism has been existed throughout of centuries all around the world. At first racism has been seen in America than it spread to Europe, Middle East and Turkey. Racism divides people into the “them” and “us” based on what our skin of color, religion of what we believe and a place where we came from. However, in Turkey racism is generally based on political, national and religious issues. In the history of Turkey racism has started in the Ottoman Empire in 1860 based on Ali Suavi who was a Turkish intellectual in Ottoman. There are tens of different nations live in Turkey like Armenians, Bosnians, Syrians, Kurds, Albanians and so many others. Sometimes some of these nations live in peace and harmony but unfortunately they may fight with each other for some reasons. Firstly, racism has started in the Ottoman Empire in 1915 and even today it is still continuing. Throughout the history of Turkey, racism and ethnic discrimination was widespread in Turkish communities, that racism and ethnic discrimination against minorities who are not Muslim and non-Sunni. In 1915 during the World War I, Relocation laws enacted by military forces to take precaution against those who opposing the government implementations at war which were applied to the Ottoman Armenians. After Tehcir law deportations and massacres was continues till accepting of "Temporary Law......

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Genocide

...means. This is how genocide starts. But one cannot simply begin a process like this without a catalyst there needs to be turmoil to help legitimize the acts, and the best legitimizer is war. War has always been an excuse for genocide, during World War I the Turks used the war as an excuse to deport and massacre over one million Christian Armenians. (Abed, M. 2015) Was this something that just happened because of war, or was it a plan from the beginning? History shows that the plan was set in motion before the war. The coup in 1913 would put a dictatorship in place with aspirations of creating a Turkish empire with one religion and one language. Armenians were the minority in Turkey, they were Christian and the most educated they were also the professionals, the business owners, the doctors, lawyers and bankers. This was used against them by the Turks who blamed the Armenians for anything and everything in Turkey, which created a cultural divide that the Turkish government used to get the majority behind them in the removal by any means of the Armenian minority. The Armenians were not the only ones killed by the Turks, there were Greeks, Assyrians and Kurds that were also victims of this genocide, with the Kurds still to this day persecuted by Turkey. This genocide was reported in the press at the time it happened, however the Turkish government has refused to acknowledge that it even occurred, they do say that there was no intent to kill the Armenians, but it just......

Words: 2605 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Essay on Turkey

...to the west; Georgia to the northeast; Armenia, Azerbaijan (the exclave of Nakhchivan) and Iran to the east; and Iraq and Syria to the southeast. The Mediterranean Sea and Cyprus are to the south; the Aegean Sea is to the west; and the Black Sea is to the north. The Sea of Marmara, the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles (which together form the Turkish Straits) demarcate the boundary between East Thrace and Anatolia; they also separate Europe and Asia.[8] Turkey is one of the six independent Turkic states. The vast majority of the population are Muslims.[9] The country's official language is Turkish, whereas Kurdish and Zazaki languages are spoken by Kurds and Zazas, who constitute 18% of the population.[10] Oghuz Turks began migrating into the area now called Turkey (derived from the Medieval Latin Turchia, i.e. "Land of the Turks") in the 11th century. The process was greatly accelerated by the Seljuk victory over the Byzantines at the Battle of Manzikert.[11] Several small beyliks and the Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm ruled Anatolia until the Mongol invasion. Starting from the 13th century, the Ottoman beylik united Anatolia and created an empire encompassing much of Southeastern Europe, Western Asia and North Africa. After the Ottoman Empire collapsed following its defeat in World War I, parts of it were occupied by the victorious Allies. A cadre of young military officers, led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and his colleagues, organized a successful resistance to the Allies; in......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Alevi Community

................... 9 1.3. Invention of Ali and Evolution from Hz. Ali to Ali................................... 13 1.4. “Perversion” and the Alevis, an Expression .............................................. 14 1.5. An Analysis on the Studies on Alevis........................................................ 16 1.6. Theorotical Framework.............................................................................. 21 2.BRIEF HISTORY ............................................................................................ 34 2.1. Turks and Islam.......................................................................................... 34 2.2. The Establishment Years of the Ottoman Empire and Bektaşilik.............. 36 2.3. The Alevi Identity and the New Turkish Republic .................................... 42 2.4. The Multi Party Era and the Alevis............................................................ 49 2.5. September 12, Islam and the Kurds ........................................................... 56 2.6. Alevi Identity after the 1980 Coup............................................................. 58 3.THE TRANSFORMATION of THE ALEVI IDENTITY in BREAKING POINTS................................................................................................................ 83 3.1. Sivas: Massacre or Incident?...................................................................... 83 3.2. Başbağlar Massacre and New Hegemonic Discourses ....................................

Words: 52011 - Pages: 209

Premium Essay

Ottoman Empire

...What were the military successes of the Ottoman-Turk? In creating a third (non-Arab) Islamic Empire Modern Middle East 31 May 2012 Introduction The Ottoman success was largely due to the more advanced weaponry systems they had, because of the better equipment they had improved their battlefield success greatly. The Ottomans ruled a large area and let non-Muslims practiced their own religions long as they paid their taxes and obeyed the law. Summary The Ottoman Empire was a success because the military is made up of two distinct groups, the kapti kallari forces and the locals. The ghazis, which were the Turkish warriors, were largely responsible for the conquest of Anatolia. The first twelve sultans enjoyed long reigns, this was necessary because instability at the top is sure to force decline in any empire. Body One of the reasons was because of nationalism and a notion that a state and ethnic nation are very similar; early on the Ottoman Empire was defined by his ruler, by its faith, as well as its military, all acting in sync. The empire emerged from a number of Turkey smaller states in Anatolia that was left behind from the devastating Mongol Victory at Kose Dagh (1243) over the Sultanate, Suleiman the Magnificent (1520-66). The reign of this great king represented the acme of Ottoman power. This was one of the finest states in the Western World, a universal empire unmatched in size, wealth and military power. Obviously,......

Words: 767 - Pages: 4