Speeches

In: Business and Management

Submitted By blaine
Words 2149
Pages 9
INDEX

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PREPERATION
2.1. FOUNDATIONS.
2.1.1. The Occasion.
2.1.2. The Audience.
2.1.3. The Purpose of your speech.

3. STRUCTURE
3.1. STRUCTURING OF THE SPEECH.
3.2. THE BEGINNING.
3.3. THE BODY.
3.4. THE CLOSING.

4. DELIVERY
4.1. WHAT MATERIAL?
4.1.1. Reading from a Script.
4.1.2. Using Notes.
4.1.3. Reciting from Memory.
4.2. SPEECH DELIVERY RECOMMENDATIONS

5. SPEECH

6. CONCLUSION

7. REFERENCES

1. INTRODUCTION

During the course of Leadership Development, it has often been mentioned that to lead people, the leader must motivate his followers, and one of the likely methods is to give the people a speech.

To give a speech requires certain skills. Some people have these skills naturally, think of some of the great leaders in history, like Churchill and Hitler, and the way that they spoke to the people and motivated them. These skills can also be learned and every person can give a good speech if he or she follows a few simple guidelines.

In the following few chapters I will attempt to discuss these guidelines. I will cover the three different steps in speeches, the planning, the writing and the delivery.

Discipline in following these steps, and confidence will make it possible for the novice to give a successful speech.

2. PREPERATION
2.1. Foundations.
Often, when one starts to prepare there is the urge to take a pen and paper and to start writing the speech. This is very often the wrong way to start a speech. Planning the speech forms an important step in the preparation of the speech. To not plan a speech could lead to re-writing the speech and will waste time. Through careful planning and preparation, you will answer all the questions and doubts about your speech before they arise. The contents of your speech, and how you deliver it, are based on three important factors:…...

Similar Documents

Functional Analysis of Anticipatory ''It'' Lexical Bundles in Political Speeches Functional Analysis of Anticipatory ''It'' Lexical Bundles in Political Speeches

...Functional Analysis of Anticipatory ''It'' Lexical Bundles in Political Speeches Abstract This paper investigates a particular structural group of frequent word combinations referred to as ‘anticipatory it lexical bundles’. Lexical bundles are words formed that often co- occur in longer sequences. They are not idiomatic or structurally complete, but the sequences are building blocks in discourse and are so common and recurrent that the readers and listeners should pay much attention to them. The paper aims at showing and exploring structures and functions of the 'anticipatory it lexical bundles' presented in political speeches. This paper adopts Hewings and Hewings's categorization of interpersonal functions of 'anticipatory it lexical bundles'. Furthermore, the present investigation scrutinizes the interpersonal functions of 'anticipatory it lexical bundles' in the discourse of political speeches delivered by British politician 'Margaret Thatcher'. The structural and functional types of 'anticipatory it lexical bundles' found in the speeches under analysis are described and compared. The main finding of this paper indicates that there are two main interpersonal functions of lexical bundles that dominate in this domain: attitude markers and emphatics. 1.1 Lexical Bundles Lexical bundles, as a particular and relatively recent category of word combinations with a possibly formulaic status (Biber and Barbieri, 2007: 263), are coined......

Words: 11541 - Pages: 47

Protected Speeches

...1) There are a variety of speeches that are not protected under the first amendment, although the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech , the First amendment was not intended to protect every utterance. Many United States Supreme Court cases have consistently held that there are narrow categories of speech that are not protected which include but are not limited to, obscenity, child pornography, inciting to riot, libel, false advertising, perjury, threats, harassment, and invasion of privacy. Although the definition of obscenity is not sufficiently clear, the United States Supreme Court provided a workable attempt in defining what is obscene. In 1973 in the case of Miller vs. California, the court held that before any material can be determined obscene they must determine whether the average person would find the work taken as a whole appealing to prurient interest, whether the work describes in a patently offensive way, and whether the work taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Obscenity can be in many forms such as conduct, pictorial representation of conduct and in the written and oral description of conduct with each method of expression presenting its own problems. Laws that prohibit indecent or obscene language will be struck down as unconstitutional where they do not articulate a boundary between those expressions that are protected by the constitution and this particular one is not. Racist speech......

Words: 758 - Pages: 4

Union Speeches

...He stated that the states are equal, the two classes were equal at first, and that was what the “Constitution was founded on that equilibrium”. He believed that as states expanded into new territories under the bill, that if they were free, then the territory would be free, and if they were from slave states, then they would allow slavery. Seward felt slavery should be abolished, and denied that the “Constitution recognized property in man”. Seward let Congress know that he is not one of those in the North that wanted to support slavery. While he recognized that it would take time to bring the Union back in agreement with each other and toward the equality of all citizens of the Union, he did state it could be possible. All three speeches were interesting. The one I found to be most interesting was that of William Henry Seward. He gave an informative speech that told the key points for both sides, stated his stance, told people what God would do, and finished. His references to the process of the development against slavery in Europe and how it would speak to the United States in bringing the Union back together standing strong as a nation was interesting. I enjoyed his reference to the creation of the earth and God’s declaration of the dominion of man over all on the earth. He also gave it the title of “absolute human dominion”, stating that “the title of that dominion, thus bestowed, would have been incomplete, if the lord of all terrestrial things could......

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

The Comparison in Speeches

... The Comparison in Speeches The arrangement and use of words have a huge role in how the reader or listener will react. Words can influence ones feelings both favorably and unfavorably. During the heart ache and confusion such as December 7, 1941, with the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the attacks of September 11, 2001, two of the nation’s presidents sent out words of sympathy and encouragement in their speeches, in reassurance that the horrible acts that took place would not be tolerated. The famous “Infamy” speech was given by Franklin Delano Roosevelt a day after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The speech is known by the popular line, “a date which will live in infamy” (Roosevelt). Roosevelt wanted to get an up rise out of the American people, he done this through Charged Language. The Speech was a persuasive piece that’s purpose was to gain a war declaration. Roosevelt combined facts with rhetorical technique to produce a strong argument to convince congressional representatives and the American people that military action should be taken in response to Japans attack. Connotation was also used throughout his speech. For example, “But always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us” (Roosevelt). Through out the speech, Roosevelt made clear Japan had deceived the untied stated and could not be trusted. “ Yesterday, December 7, 19941, a date which will live in infamy, the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately......

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Listening to Speeches

...Solvakia Lemon Public Speaking 210-50 Informative Speech September 7, 2011 Chapter 5: Listening to Speeches Listening is an important part of the communication process. It is stated as being the active processing of the information we receive. How well you listen has a major impact on the quality of your relationships with others. Listening is a skill which everyone can benefit from improvement. A great deal of our communication process is devoted to listening. Chapter five focuses on improving your listening skills with suggestions and principles and also identifies barriers that keep people from listening at peak efficiency. In this essay, we will go over all key points and terms that will help you become an effective listener. To become an effective listener we first need to develop certain skills that can be used in stages to guide us through the process. Effective listening involves selecting, attending to, understanding, and remembering the meaning behind the message. The goal as a public speaker is to develop and deliver a speech that audience members will listen and respond to. (62) Although it seems easy, there are barriers that can hinder a speech from being received by the listener. These barriers are referred to as listening barriers. Listening barriers are created when we fail to select, attend to, or understand a message or remember what was said. (62) There are many listening barriers that can vary depending on the individual;......

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

Comparasion Between Speeches

...Comparison between speeches You have heard of the speeches that Mitt Romney and Barrack Obama made right? The concession speech from Mitt Romney, and the victory speech from Barrack Obama. Well I am here to tell you about HOW both speeches compare. What were the differences? What were the similarities? Read on and you will find out. How was Barrack Obama’s speech like? Barrack Obama’s speech was very long; maybe because it was his victory speech, after all he did win the place as president. What I also saw was that Obama did not talk only about him, he talked about us. He didn’t boast in Romney’s face, he said that he hopes that they could work together. What was the surroundings like? Well I know for sure that it was huge, the headquarters in Chicago was humongous. There were also a lot of people in the headquarters listening to Obama’s speech. How was Romney’s speech like? Well Romney’s speech was not too long. The speech was technically all about how he would make a better president if he won; I think that is why it is called a concession speech, because concession means to accept that something is true, or acknowledging defeat, and it is a speech. In all his speech he only talked about how he would make a great president, and how his wife would make a great first lady. I also realized that there were barely any people. How do both speeches compare? Well let’s tell the differences first. First, Obama’s headquarters in Chicago held more people than Romney’s did.......

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Scott Gessford Spch 275 Week 4 Great Speeches.

...Week 4 Great speeches Public Speaking The context of this speech is extremely important for what took place on August 28th, 1963. It the height of a race war going on between blacks and whites in America this speech really hit home to a lot of people. It took place in Washington D.C., United States, approximately mid-day. The reason he must have chosen to speak in that location and time was because of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. This was a huge demonstration to create support for the civil rights movement, as purposed by John F Kennedy. The audience he was speaking to were protesting for the civil rights movement that day in Washington. White and blacks joined together to listen to the speech that Dr. Martin Luther King was presenting. He had obviously done his homework. He originally was paying homage to Abraham Lincoln’s centennial of the emancipation proclamation. He had observed that even though 100 years later the black people were still not free. Forced to sit in designated areas and be a lower class of people during the time. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a very bright man, he had studied his audience and also the social heartache the Civil Rights Movement was putting the black people through. His background, growing up in Mississippi, had shown him there was a problem with the culture and misrepresentation with the black people of America. He had realized even being freed from slavery did not essentially make them free. He wanted equality......

Words: 522 - Pages: 3

Speeches

...Speakers envision a positive or changed outcome of an event, one that may not eventuate into reality, however imbue a message into realms of inspiration provides, hope and understanding for those engaged. Political democrats Aung San Suu Kyi and Anwar Sadat both explore the prospect for peace, equality and tolerance within the conflicts that were current to the time of their delivery. The speech ‘Keynote Address at the Beijing World Conference on Women’ 1995, and ‘Statement to the Knesset’ 1977, reveal to responders the power of speeches to correlate the actual and the possible through a promotion of ethical values, unity and hope. Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of the National League for Democracy conveys the impact of barriers between tolerance, and conflict. Her speech addresses not only those at the Beijing conference, but the international community to urge for gender equality and tolerance. Aung San Suu Kyi informs that 1995 is the “International year for Tolerance" to directly engage her audience. With her appeal Kyi’s political passions are highlighted in her critical assertion, “insecure people tend to be intolerant…where there is no security there can be no lasting peace.” This contrast confronts the impediment of political tensions, claiming through the anaphora of “it is want”, “it is fear” that liberation from political desires can achieve peace. Thus her speech is integral to not only the Burmese democratic issue in 1995, but upon reflection of the ongoing......

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Listening to Speeches

...Chapter 4- Listening to Speeches I. Barriers to Effective Listening A. Listening Barriers 1. Select- To single out a message from several competing messages 2. Attend- To focus on or select incoming information for further processing. 3. Understand- To assign meaning to the stimuli to which you attend. 4. Remember- To recall ideas and information B. Information Overload 1. We all spend a large part of each day listening. 2. As a public speaker, you can keep your audience from tuning you out by making sure your speech has a good balance between new information and supporting material, such as stories and examples. C. Prejudice 1. The process of forming preconceived opinions, attitudes, and beliefs about a person, place, thing, or message. 2. Such positive prejudices can also inhibit your ability to listen accurately to a message. D. Receiver Apprehension 1. Receiver Apprehension- The fear of misunderstanding or misinterpreting the spoken messages of others. 2. If you experience receiver apprehension, you will have to work harder to comprehend the information presented by others. II. Becoming a Better Listener A. Understanding Your Listening Style 1. Listening styles- Preferred ways of making sense out of spoken messages. 2. People Oriented Listener-Someone who is comfortable listening to others express feelings and emotions. 3. Action Oriented Listener- Someone who prefers information that is......

Words: 342 - Pages: 2

Julius Caesar Death Speeches Comparasons

... Throughout his speech, he uses paralipsis and repetition to poke at Brutus but at the same time save Caesar’s reputation. Specifically, Antony repeatedly used the word “honorable” to describe Brutus. The effect of this was that he was contradicting Brutus’s speech. A paralipsis is a device used to draw attention to something while claiming to pass it over. There are two examples of this one is “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” But throughout the speech he praises Caesar and what he as done. Another example is “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know.”, although he talks good about Caesar and what he has done for Rome, in contrary to what Brutus said. While comparing the two speeches I have found that Antony’s speech was more persuasive. He made points to contrast what Brutus said in his speech about Caesar. He says that Brutus was wrong, and he put a new spin on it. For instance, Brutus says “Had you rather Caesar was living and die all slaves…” which was countered by Antony. It was countered by Antony saying that Caesar felt deeply for his people and that he was a very humble kindhearted person. Throughout Antony’s speech he uses devices, tactics, and his sympathy to his advantage. Brutus only had one point, which was that he killed Caesar for Rome, to stand on. All in all, Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus's....

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Great Speeches

...dimensions of speech such as sounds, gestures, syntax, rhetoric, meanings, speech acts, moves, strategies and turns. In this paper our main focus is on the rhetoric of a speech. As we know where rhetoric is concerned we should inevitably deal with literature. In other words rhetoric is like a joint which connect literature with politics and establish a method of analyzing political speeches called polio-linguistic approach. Thus we can consider political discourses as pieces of literature. Literary techniques especially rhetorical devices serve as one of the most distinctive features of the greatest and most influential speeches of all time. There is no shortage of rhetorical devices used in these speeches, but we can prioritize them by count of repetitions in political discourses. In this study first I have represented the necessity of using these types of persuasive skills in political discourses, the methods within which politicians take advantages of these skills and the different sides of a successful speech. Then after a glance through different rhetorical devices, excerpts from four of the greatest speeches in history are provided with the rhetorical devices indicated in them. Finally a quite deep examination of the most important of these rhetorical devices is presented and the conclusion is made through comparing these samples. The primary purpose of every presenter or rhetorician is to grab people`s attention. After that he/ she needs to convey people`s......

Words: 4138 - Pages: 17

Speeches

...Karleigh Martinec World Civ III 2/9/16 “A Message to Every Land Where the Jewish Race is Scattered” AJ Balfour A.J. Balfour was a Conservative prime minister and was a foreign secretary in the wartime alliances. He was very interested in the Jewish national movement and throughout his speech he talks about how he has no prejudice towards Jewish people and he feels that they should be able to have a better life. He tells the audience that they must not forget about how the Jews have been treated throughout history, and describes their history and position, and connection with world politics and religion to be “absolutely unique.” He then goes on to say that he hopes to successfully defend the scheme of the Palestine Mandate. He wants to the people to give Jews the opportunity of developing under British rule in peace and quietness. “The Life of the Negro Race Has Been a Life of Tragedy” Clarence Darrow In Clarence Darrow’s speech, The Life of the Negro Race Has Been a Life of Tragedy, he is speaking about a very tragic case that took place in 1926 when 60,000 black people in Chicago lived in overcrowded headquarters and were driven out. Dr Ossian Sweet defended himself while a large crowd attacked his home. During this, a white man was killed which resulted in Sweet and eleven blacks being arrested. Darrow was the lawyer for this defense, but the jurors couldn’t agree so the case was dismissed. Throughout Darrow’s speech he talks about how black people are not treated...

Words: 729 - Pages: 3

Great Speeches in Time

...Jada Rameriz Putnam Frosh Writing F Block ELA Great speakers have a way with words. Subtle patterns flow throughout their speeches in ways that even they might not realize. It can be clearly seen with some of the greatest speakers seen; Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy, Jimmy Valvano, and Steve Jobs. All of them share common threads throughout their speeches, and that’s what makes them great. Their unique tones and methods of conveying their message shows their excellence. By use of tone and sharing personal stories or alluding to other texts, great speakers convey their messages in many ways. In his speech, Martin Luther King Jr. creates a distinct and professional style by use of literary devices to convey his message. MLK’s use of literary devices provides emphasis and strengthens his hopeful, unified, and well-prepared speech. MLK often uses allusions to different texts within his speech in order to get a point across, such as referencing historical texts to bring out feelings of patriotism in the audience. MLK’s message is one of unity and equality, which is eloquently proposed to the audience through his well-usage of literary devices. By unifying his speech in this manner and showing different texts as equal in value, MLK also approaches the audience with the idea that they are all equally as important as well. RFK’s speech on the death of MLK has a very somber and mourning tone, but still proves it’s greatness despite the speaker’s......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Impromptu Speeches

...Impromptu Speeches Colorado Christian University July 9, 2011 Impromptu Speeches When it comes to public speaking, there are several topics I could speak to with little or no preparation. These topics would be related to things I am very familiar with and have a great depth of knowledge. These topics would be related to my work, as it is a subject I am extremely familiar with. Planning, accountability, and effective delegation are just some of the topics that I would be very comfortable speaking about with no preparation. I have reached the current state of familiarity with these topics based of years of experience and getting to practice these subjects on a daily basis over an extended amount of time. These are topics which would be easy to speak about, from and informative and persuasive perspective. There is a lot of factual information that can be delivered with these topics about how to use a planner, how tasks should be prioritized based on urgency, the ability to lead others… things of that nature. This can also be approached from a persuasive standpoint by explaining how these tactics can help the audience. By relating personal experiences on success and how these topics have helped me succeed, will persuade the audience. The best way I can replicate this for future speeches, is to ensure my depth of knowledge on the given subject is at a level to which would allow me to feel comfortable when speaking about it. I would also need to feel......

Words: 322 - Pages: 2

Speeches

...Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Abstract Background. In obese patients, reduced functional residual capacity exacerbated by supine position might decrease the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation and the tolerance to apnoea. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of body posture during pre-oxygenation, sitting or supine, on its effectiveness in obese patients. Methods. Forty obese patients (BMI ≥35 kg m−2) undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 (sitting, n=20) or Group 2 (supine, n=20). In the predetermined body position, pre-oxygenation was achieved with eight deep breaths within 60 s and an oxygen flow of 10 litre min−1. After rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in decubitus position, the trachea was intubated and the patient was left apneic and disconnected from the anesthesia circuit until SpO2 decreased to 90%. The time taken for desaturation to 90% from the end of induction of anesthesia was recorded. Arterial blood oxygen tension was measured before (baseline) and after pre-oxygenation. Values were compared with two-way ANOVA and unpaired Student's t-test. Results. Oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions were similar between groups, both at baseline and after pre-oxygenation. However, the mean time to desaturation to 90% was significantly longer in the sitting......

Words: 271 - Pages: 2