Not a Symbian

In: People

Submitted By bidspaul
Words 615
Pages 3
Dictionary says Symbiosis means "any interdependent or mutually beneficial relationship between two persons, groups, etc.".But do I really belong to that category?
I have many faces - red , green , blue,white and so on.Am I myself aware of those faces?Sometimes yes and most of the times no!They keep on changing like masks.They make me puzzled. I remember once I dreamt of being a carbon atom where my face goes for substitution reaction.Perhaps that was an overdose of organic chemistry in the early years of your life when you just begin to "make" masks.But now I find how true that was.Now I can make,wear and sell masks.My faces are not individuals, some of them like parasites.Creeping creatures who constantly struggle with each other, in an unending endevour to defame each other.And not only this, I sometimes even forget which one is my real face?May be that lies below all these masks!!And why is it so shy to make its presence felt ?May be because the new faces are so much overpowering.But sometimes when in the lonly hours I look at myself I feel desperate, desparate to tear off all those .None of the faces are in symbiosis, none of the faces want each other.How true that is when we see things around us.I may sound skeptic.I may sound pessimistic.But isnt that true?We all have faces, we all are constantly struggling to project the best face.Illusion, they say sometimes makes you happy.True.We human beings are living life in a kind of illusion.We are utmost sensitive to our own needs , be it materialistic or emotional.And we do everything for people we love.Isnt that utmost self centeredness?Because we cannot live without them.Because as humans we are also like parasites who need support and reinforcement to survive.But how often do we think about other people?Isnt the charity we do is also for self satisfaction of being benevolent?I know I can never arrive at…...

Similar Documents

Level of Product Differentiaition

...Alliance, a private independent company called “Symbian”. Symbian Ltd. is an independent, for-profit company whose mission is to establish Symbian OS as the world standard for mobile digital data systems, primarily for use in cellular telecoms. So, the three biggest mobile phone companies at that time and Psion, a mobile PC company, created a new way for competing and differentiating. Today Symbian Ltd. is owned by Ericsson, Nokia, Panasonic, Samsung, Siemens and Sony Ericsson. Figure 1 shows the percentage of shares of each shareholding company: Figure 1 Shareholding companies of Symbian and their percentage of shares Source: Symbian Ltd. – Company Ownership, http://www.symbian.com/about/ownership.html Levels of product differentiation Porter has suggested that most industries contain strategic groups of close competitors – groups of firms within an industry that follow the same strategies or ones that have very similar dimensions. For example, similar strategies might include the targeting of the same market segments, the use of identical or similar technology and the employment of the same specialist distributors. 1 1 Porter, M., “Competitive Strategy – Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors,” (New York: The Free Press, 1980). 1 Each global company participates in strategic groups and each group has its conditions of participation which the company has to follow. For example, Nokia participates in the Symbian strategic group with its......

Words: 5436 - Pages: 22

Nokia - Rise and Fall

...iPhone, Nokia smartphones like Nokia N95 with Symbian OS outsold the iPhone and had a dominating 62.5% market share in Q4 of 2007 ahead of Microsoft’s Windows mobile OS and RIM’s BlackBerry. As the competition grew fierce in 2008, Apple’s iPhone 3G hit the market which started the rise of the new kind of smartphone within the cellphone space. As Nokia felt intimidated, Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, CEO of Nokia, tried everything in his power to tackle this new threat but Nokia’s pie was being snatched away slowly. The graph below shows how Nokia was affected when Apple started manufacturing iPhones in 2008. But when the iPhone 3rd Generation phones hit the market with the new refined iOS operating system it quickly doubled the market share for Apple and reduced the Nokia’s share along with others. Nokia was still the market leader with a 40.8% market share in Q4 2008 with its new smartphone like Nokia 5800 Xpress music and Nokia E71 but was declining. In 2008, Nokia bought the Symbian operating system and the following year made it open source so that more & more apps could be developed for Symbian operating system. But this step couldn’t turn the fortunes of Nokia as in 2009 their market share of Symbian fell to 46.1% in Q4 2009 from 52.4% in Q4 2008. But in 2010 everything started to fall apart for Nokia as Google with its Android operating system along with Apple with the iOS started to eat into Nokia’s business, and the other Symbian makers including Samsung and Sony......

Words: 4460 - Pages: 18

Vert Case Analysis

...mobile market through its majority possession of Symbian shares? * Nokia has cost advantages compared to other mobile phone companies * The Brand status of Nokia is probably one of the top brands globally (Kwong & Wong, 2011). Weaknesses * The N-Gage is seen as a flop * Being the market principal and its high role in Symbian is giving the company a bad picture, just like Microsoft in the PC sector. * The brand is slow in adopting new ways of thinking. For example in clamshell phones which are favored by many customers. * Leverage its communications to get favor and a stronger status with carriers (Kwong & Wong, 2011).   Opportunities * enhance their presence in CDMA industry, which they are *  New developing markets where product adoption still has space to go, like India and other countries. * Use its infrastructure strategy to get first choice and a stronger status with carrier (Kwong & Wong, 2011). Threats * Delay in the game in 3G causes a risk to be surpassed by leaders such as Motorola, LG, NEC and others and Asian OEMs who are coming into the market aggressively (Kwong & Wong, 2011). Reference Kwong, K., & Wong, K. (2011). Vertu: Nokia’s luxury mobile phone for the urban rich. Watertown, MA: Harvard Business Publishing. Appendix I SWOT Quadrant Strengths * Is a major player in the mobile market through its majority possession of Symbian shares? * Nokia has cost advantages......

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Lihhhh

...Symbian is an open-source (EPL) mobile operating system (OS) and computing platform designed for smartphones and currently maintained by Accenture.[5] Symbian was originally developed by Symbian Ltd.,[6] as a descendant of Psion's EPOC and runs exclusively on ARM processors, although an unreleased x86 port existed. The current form of Symbian is an open-source platform developed by Symbian Foundation in 2009, as the successor of the original Symbian OS. Symbian was used by many major mobile phone brands, like Samsung, Motorola, Sony Ericsson, and above all by Nokia. It was the most popular smartphone OS on a worldwide average until the end of 2010, when it was overtaken by Android. Symbian rose to fame from its use with the S60 platform built by Nokia, first released in 2002 and powering most Nokia smartphones. UIQ, another Symbian platform, ran in parallel, but these two platforms were not compatible with each other. Symbian^3, was officially released in Q4 2010 as the successor of S60 and UIQ, first used in the Nokia N8, to use a single platform for the OS. In May 2011 an update, Symbian Anna, was officially announced, followed by Nokia Belle (previously Symbian Belle) in August 2011.[7][8] On 11 February 2011, Nokia announced that it would use Microsoft's Windows Phone OS as its primary smartphone platform, and Symbian will be its franchise platform, dropping Symbian as its main smartphone OS of choice.[9][10] On 22 June 2011 Nokia made an agreement with Accenture......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Smartphones

...network within the company. When sending emails, texts, and using smartphone applications may seem harmless, however your phone could be very vulnerable to hijacker attacks. We will explore some security issues that surround some of the primary smartphones leading the markets today and address how to mitigate users’ risk of being attacked. Some of the issues that smartphones are having problems with securing encryption keys that can unlock cell phone holders’ private information. Digital signatures are also being compromised through man in the middle and proxy attacks. While these may not seem to affect every user, surely the danger of having your password captured due to spyware may catch your attention. On the other hand, many Symbian Operating System security flaws that smartphones use to operate have proven to be the source of some application hijacks. Since smartphones such as Blackberry do not require an application code signature, network access is permitted attackers access to owners’ applications. This could cause third parties to send messages, edit, delete, and add contracts and PIM (Product Information Management) data, read and call phone numbers. Simple functions such as sending and receiving SMS (short message service) text messages can be intercepted by another application that could cause outgoing text messages to be picked up by an expensive application. This causes confusion to the smartphone owner who is oblivious that his or her......

Words: 2337 - Pages: 10

Nokia

...he downfall of Nokia - 11 reasons why they are doing so badly Nokia has been in trouble for some time now – even before Stephen Elop’s leaked memo – and so far things haven’t improved. Here are 11 reasons why. 1. Symbian is a sinking ship - the downfall of Nokia Times have changed and Android and iOS have blown Symbian out of the water. It is still desperately clinging on in some parts of the world but for most it just doesn’t come close to today’s expected level of standard. 2. Windows 7 OS may be too little too late - the downfall of Nokia Microsoft was even later in latching on to the smartphone advancements than Nokia, and that’s saying something. So far, few consumers have been keen to switch to a Windows Phone 7 device. In this case two wrongs will make one huge wrong. 3. MeeGo is a NoGo - the downfall of Nokia Back in June it was announced that the Linux-based OS would run on the flagship N9, but it didn't take off. There is nothing majorly wrong with MeeGo, it is just seen as a stopgap between Symbian and Windows Phone 7. 4. Stephen Elop has done nothing to help - the downfall of Nokia Nokia CEO Stepehen Elop made things worse. An internal memo, which Elop sent to staff, leaked in February. In the memo, Elop uses the metaphor of a burning oil station, referring to Nokia "pouring gasoline on our own burning platform". This confirmed just how much trouble Nokia is in. 5. The latest designs look like guess work...

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Blackberry Competition

...Samsung, Motorola, HTC, LG, and Nokia. Mobile operating system and mobile browser providers are also considered competitors of Blackberry. Microsoft, Google and Symbian are the biggest competitors of Blackberry in this area. Blackberry smartphones are provided with their own RIM Blackberry OS and web browser, and offer Blackberry app world, which provides blackberry users with a wide range of free and paid apps that they can download to their smart phone. Blackberry also offers their own text messaging software, theme studio, business software and many other features. Apple iPhones come with their own operating system, iOS, and have fully functional using touch screen technology. iPhones offer access to thousands of free and apps using the Apple App store (iTunes). The newest iPhone 4 offers video conferencing and full retina display. Palm offers their own operating system known as palmOS or webOS, depending on the phone. They also offer access to the Palm App Catalog where palm smartphone users can download applications to use on their phone. HTC have a number of smartphones, some of which use Google Android, and others which use Windows Mobile. The newest HTC smartphones use Windows Phone 7 HTC has a number of apps that can be downloaded with Android or Windows Mobile Apps. Nokia smartphones use Symbian OS, which is the mobile OS that has been around the longest. Nokia offers applications that are downloadable using the Ovi App store. Samsung smartphones......

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Comparing Two Different Os Systems

...Symbian OS is officially the property of Nokia. It means that any other company will have to take permission from Nokia before using this operating system. Nokia has remained a giant in low-end mobile market, so after Java symbian was the most used in the mobile phones till a couple of years ago. Still Symbian is widely used in low-end phones but the demand rate has ben continuously decreasing. By upgrading Symbian mobile OS, Nokia has made it capable to run smartphones efficiently. Symbian ANNA and BELLE are the two latest updates which are currently used in Nokia’s smartphones. Overall, the Symbian OS is excellently designed and is very user-friendly. Unfortunately, Symbian OS graph is going downwards nowadays due to the immense popularity of Android and iOS. Some of the phones currently running on Symbian OS are Nokia C6-01, Nokia 603, Nokia 700, Nokia 808 Pure View, Nokia E6 (ANNA) and Nokia 701 (BELLE). Symbian is a popular choice among nokia dual sim mobile phones as well. September 20th 2008 was the date when Google released the first Android OS by the name of ‘Astro’. After some time next upgraded versions ‘Bender’ and ‘Cupcake’ were also released. Google then adopted the trend of naming android versions after any dessert or a sweet in alphabetical order. The other releases are Donut, Éclair, Froyo, Gingerbread, Honeycomb, Ice Cream Sandwich and Jelly Bean. Jelly Bean is so far the latest android version from google. Since the platform is not closed like IOS,......

Words: 363 - Pages: 2

A Co-Evolution Model of Competitive Mobile Platforms

...edu, 2 yassin@fau.edu Received 13 January 2011; received in revised form 10 April 2011; accepted 18 May 2011 Abstract A model depicting competitive technoeconomics of business structures specific to mobile-platforms is developed. The underlying co-evolution of large, competing enterprises of mobile-platforms that face customerchurning due to application-preferences and pricing structures in the deregulated ambient is viewed in the perspectives of nonlinear logistic systems akin to that of biological ecosystems. Relevant considerations are decided by and embodied with several stochastically-interacting subsystems. Hence, the temporal dynamics of competition/co-evolution of known competitors in the mobile-platform market, like Android, Symbian and iPhone is depicted by a novel model posing dichotomy of prey-predator flip-flops in the market; and, an asymptotic projection of ex post computations of underlying technoeconomics into the ex ante region would correspond to futuristic forecasts on the performance of test platforms. Further, computed results are exemplified with a sample calculation and associated sensitivity details. Keywords: Mobile-platform, Co-evolution, Competition, Prey-predator model, Technoeconomic forecasting 31 Perambur Neelakanta Raef Yassin A Co-Evolution Model of Competitive Mobile Platforms: Technoeconomic Perspective Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research ISSN 0718–1876 Electronic Version VOL 6 / ISSUE 2 /......

Words: 11617 - Pages: 47

Segmentation

... PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(a) PROCEDURE To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No IV/JV.12 – ERICSSON / NOKIA / PSION / MOTOROLA (SYMBIAN II) Notification of 20 November 1998 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No. 4064/89 1. On 20 November 1998, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 [ OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 p. 1; corrigendum OJ L 257 of 21.9.1990, p. 13; as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97, OJ L 180, 9. 7. 1997, p. 1, corrigendum in OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p. 17 .] by which Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) would acquire joint control in Symbian Limited (“Symbian”). As a result of the operation, Motorola, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“Ericsson”), Nokia Corporation (“Nokia”) and Psion PLC (“Psion”) would jointly control Symbian. 2. Having examined the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation does not fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. I PARTIES 3. Ericsson, Nokia and Motorola are all active in developing, manufacturing and marketing advanced systems and related terminals for wired and mobile telecommunications. Psion is a UK corporation that develops, engineers, manufactures and markets handheld portable computers and software. 4. Symbian is an existing joint venture, incorporated in the UK, created earlier this year by Psion, Ericsson and Nokia for the purpose of developing, marketing and licensing...

Words: 1666 - Pages: 7

Nokia: Deficient Area and Solution to That

...Previously a clear market leader, Finnish communications company Nokia has more recently been experiencing sliding profits and a declining share of the global mobile phone market. While the company has still been achieving strong sales figures in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle-east and Africa, the company has been struggling to compete against industry giants Samsung and Apple in the U.S. smartphone market. In addition to selling mobile phones, Nokia also offers a range of internet services under the brand name Ovi. One of these services was the Ovi App store, launched in 2009. Unfortunately, the Ovi store failed to make a strong impression in the market and while the store is maintained for those customers still using a Symbian operating system, the company more recently announced that they would be transitioning to the use of Windows Phone 7 and the respective App store. While some Ovi services do still exist and others have been merged with different providers, in 2011 Nokia announced that they would ultimately be discontinuing use of the Ovi brand. In 2007, a joint venture was formed between the Finnish company Nokia and German company Siemens. The multinational company Nokia Siemens Networks offers data networking services and telecommunications equipment, and as of 2011 was the fourth largest company in the industry, consistently turning over billion dollar profit figures since its launch. Deficiency: Four major aspects of marketing that cause......

Words: 1981 - Pages: 8

Smartphones

...vague and there is no official definition for what constitutes the difference between them. The definitions also shift over time since many phones that are considered feature phones today can have capabilities that exceed those of phones that had been promoted as smartphones in the past. Smartphones run mobile operating systems such as Apple's iOS, Google's Android, Microsoft's Windows Phone 7, Nokia's Symbian, RIM's BlackBerry OS, and embedded Linux distributions such as Maemo and MeeGo. Such systems can be installed on many different phone models, and typically each device can receive multiple OS software updates over its lifetime. Smartphones run third-party applications using advanced application programming interfaces (APIs),[4] which can allow those applications to have better integration with the phone's OS and hardware than is typical with feature phones. In comparison, feature phones more commonly run on proprietary firmware, with third-party software support through platforms such as Java ME or BREW.[1] Contents [hide] 1 History 1.1 Early years 1.2 Symbian 1.3 Palm, Windows, and BlackBerry 1.4 iPhone 1.5 Android 1.6 Others 2 Patent licensing and litigation 3 Screen 4 Application stores 5 Smartphone market share 6 Operating system market shares 6.1 Customer loyalty by operating system 7 Manufacturer market shares 7.1 Customer satisfaction by manufacturer 8 Open-source development 9 Popular Services 9.1 Location-based......

Words: 2177 - Pages: 9

Retrenchment

...whom were comfortable with older, clunkier platforms such as Windows Mobile, Palm OS, and Nokia's own Symbian. Nokia was particularly blind to the threat of the iPhone. The company was still the undisputed leader in smartphones, something its executives would regularly tout when asked about the iPhone. Nokia had its own application store, but it was a pale imitation of what developers could do with iOS. At that point it was clear Nokia had lost a lot of the buzz that sustained its brand. Its still-strong position was a legacy of its past strength, and as a result, it began to see its market share slowly deteriorate. It clung to Symbian too long: Symbian was already showing its age when the iPhone arrived, but the cracks really started to appear when Google's Android took center stage. Android gave other handset manufacturers a modern operating system they could use to compete with against the iPhone, and many were quick to jump on the bandwagon. Motorola, which faced its own struggles after the success of its Razr faded, adopted Android wholeheartedly and immediately got a big push from Verizon Wireless, which was looking for its own counter to AT&T's iPhone. HTC was quick to adopt Android and saw an immediate benefit. Samsung and LG followed more slowly, but in a big way. Nokia, however, stubbornly clung to Symbian. In 2008, the company released Symbian as part of the Symbian Foundation, an effort to form a coalition of vendors and companies supporting the platform. It......

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Symbian

...SYMBIAN CASE 1. What are the differences between the business models implemented by Symbian, Google, and Apple? So first talking about Apple we can clearly see that that are really focused on innovation and they want to deliver a balance product when it comes to system and design. They handle the creation of their OS system so they have a lot of control over it. So as we can see they focus a lot on product innovation and having a lot of control over their processes so they can be sure they the quality of the product is up to their requirements and they can charge the price they want. Second, Google is offering a common platform among devices , they want to "standardise" the cellphone market and by offering the same thing to Evonne to run in different phones is a good way to do it. The way they are making money is through advertisement given that they are passing their knowledge to other companies to use their OS. Finally when it came to Symbian we can say that they sell adaptable licensees and work on one basic OS. They make it work in order to sell it to a lot of people by working with the ones making the apps, so in the end they offer a better product. So also allows them to create money from them and not from final costumers. 2. What is your assessment of Microsoft’ s performance in the mobile space? Microsoft was not new to entering markets late, and the mobile phone one was no difference. Even when they did not have any experience in mobile......

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Future of Symbian Os

...Future of Symbian OS lthough Symbian is still the most popular OS in the world, it is often overshadowed by Apple␣s iPhone and Google Android operating system. Its future looks very dim as it has lost 18.8% of its market share in 2011 Q2 shipments compared to 2010 Q2 shipments (BBC, 2010). Symbian once dominated the smart phone market, having shipments more than all of its competitors combined. Symbian benefited from better battery life and lower hardware requirements that its competitors since it was born. But it is no longer competing to be the best phone OS, or the best smart phone OS, it␣s now competing to be the best OS for internet phones (TechCrunch, 2010). Great internet phones like iPhone and Android include better web browsing, better multimedia, and apps of all shapes and sizes and as well as better UI to make all that content accessible. Symbian has never been an OS for internet phones. The Symbian definition of a smart phone was a phone with PDA functions. The browser was always a second class citizen, a third-party component ␣ Opera by default in the early days (TechCrunch, 2010). And long before it was made open source, the platform had a well earned reputation for being hard to program but this was hugely beneficial to Symbian as a business in the early days. 80% of Symbian␣s revenues were earned through consulting for licenses (TechCrunch, 2010). Symbian␣s licensees each had their own proprietary telephony chipsets that needed to be integrated and their......

Words: 566 - Pages: 3