Free Essay

Josephus

In: Other Topics

Submitted By blaine
Words 903
Pages 4
Titus Flavius Josephus was an ethnic Hebrew man, a soldier, a husband many, many times as well as a historian. Because he was a historian he was able to attain knowledge pertaining to different sects in Judaism. This ability allowed him to choose to be a Pharisee. His opinion may have been that he was against the war between the Romans and Jews but it did not change the fact that he became the commander of Galilee. In essence, he fought the Romans between the years of 66 A.D and 73 A.D as not only a commander but as a leader. Given this fight and Jews’ determination, thousands of people were still killed after being invaded by the Romans after the Jewish garrison of Yodfat’s fate was put into the Roman’s hands. After Galilee broke down, people of Jerusalem were not left with many options. They could have either surrendered to the Romans or committed suicide. Josephus did not commit suicide, but instead he opted to surrender to the Romans by bringing in his intelligence to their table in 67 A.D. When he decided to surrender to the Romans, the Romans took notice and admired him greatly. The general of Vespasian of Rome admired him so much that he took his name “Flavius” as his own. He informed the Romans about certain Although he called himself Josephus, people came to call him Titus Flavius. Even though Josephus’ life was in shambles during the war due to the fact that his wife and family ceased to exist when the Romans invaded Galilee, Vespasian compensated for that by arranging him to marry a captured woman in Rome. It seemed like it was going to go well, but when that wife left him in 70 A.D he married again with a Jewish lady and it resulted in three male children, but only of his children managed to survive. Soon he left this wife and five years later married a more respectable women who managed to have two more sons for him that survived. Throughout Josephus’ life he had created many works of writings which made his style very predictable. With that said, it was scandalous to read the “Testimonium Flavianum” claimed to have been written by Josephus his readers had a hard time believing it. Although there was no proof as to whether or not Josephus wrote “Testimonium Flavianum” in its entirety experts felt its safe to assume he did not. The text shows many Christian-historian inspired writings above all things. Namely, the word of Jesus was never seen-- it was just simply spread through the word of mouth. Christianity’s idea of Jesus was different from Josephus’. “The casual link would be clearer if we could be sure that epagogeto meant ‘seduced, astray.’ That is possible, though not necessary, meaning of the verb, Once again, Josephus might be engaging in a studied ambiguity.” (1) This quote delicately pointed out the subtle difference in the stylistic writings compared to Josephus’ earlier works but at the same time did not completely discredit the writing. Many writers thought that perhaps he was just being ambiguous because he had spent most of his writing career being very ambiguous and that had become another style of Josephus. With that in mind, there was a reference to Jesus in Antiquities of the Jew where he was saying one thing yet meaning something more. “He was a doer of wonderful deeds, a teacher of people who receive the truth with pleasure.” (2) This implied that he acknowledged a Jesus and felt compelled to let others know of this but he was not being very detailed about who he was writing about. Other writers, such as Mark made it very clear when he spoke of Jesus and even went as far as to say His name. “But Jesus said, ‘Do not hinder him, for there is no one who will perform a miracle in My name, and be able soon afterward to speak evil of Me.’” (3) This showed his willingness to expose Jesus to nonbelievers and it pulled the wool off of ignorant eyes. He never explained why he chose to surrender to the Romans during the Jewish war or why he never fully understood the severity of his betrayal to Jerusalem but to him it never mattered. He was the one that benefited handsomely for that betrayal. His actions at times made people question whether he was a true historian or if his writings were just ways to exploit untrue statements to make Rome look better. Although it is simple to consider him an exploit, there are some redeemable qualities about him. Although he was considered a Roman citizen at some point, he was always said that he was law abiding Jew. He even went as far to expose people to the ways of Judaism and how it could have been applicable to Romans. He was always looked for an opportunity to show how civilized and educated the Jews were.

Footnotes
1) Jesus the Jew: Fall 2007 Course Readings: Josephus; pg.78, line 34
2) Antiquities of the Jews: Book 18; Chapter 3, paragraph 3
3) Mark 9:39
4) Sources: Josephus, “Jesus the Jew,” page 56

Bibliography
Jesus the Jew: Fall 207 Course Readings Professor Wendy Raver
The New American Standard Bible
Flavius Josephus Home Page: http://members.aol.com/fljosephus/home.htm…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Tacitus on Vespasian

...for the arrival of his son Titus, who was on his way back from Syria, where he had acted as the link between Mucianus and his father in their negotiations. The whole affair was carried through by a spontaneous move on the part of the troops, and there was no time to arrange a formal parade or concentrate the scattered legions.”” (Tacitus Histories II.79) This narrative from Tacitus' Histories refers to the seemingly spontaneous proclamation of Vespasian as Emperor of Rome in AD69. This event ultimately lead to the end of the civil war that had seen three emperors proclaimed and killed in the space of a year in Rome. That the army had proclaimed Vespasian on July 1 is also backed up by Suetonius (Suet. Vesp.6) and by Dio (REF) However Josephus does not date the event, and states that the Judean legions were the first to proclaim Vespasian (BJ, 601).. Despite the absence of detail within this passage, the acclamation of Vespasian by the troops was the culmination of a series of political manipulations which had been designed and carried out, by the three men mentioned, in the months leading up to July 1. Tiberius Alexander was the prefect of Egypt. Both he and Mucianus had a long associate with Vespasian through their united effort against a common enemy in the Jewish war (Levick, 1999, p. 54). Additionally both men had served under Corbulo (Levick, 1999, pp. 56-57). Between the four of them they had control of over one third of the Armies and auxillaries of the......

Words: 685 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Identification of Ancient Gennesar

...24th of June 1875, the French researcher Victor Guérin climbed up a small hill in the western ‘Alawir’ valley on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee. At the top of the hill stood the grave of Sheikh Abu Shusha, after whom the surrounding ruins were called “Khirbat Abu Shosha” (the Ruins of Abu Shusha). Guérin wrote the following in his notebook: ‘As to [the town of] Kinneret, which is identical to Gennesar, I do not see any place more reasonable than the hill of Abu Shusha. Indeed, the ruins covering it now are not very impressive, and the dilapidated Arab village whose remains are to be found here do not suggest a city that apparently stood in this site ages ago. However, Kinneret was no doubt laid to ruin many hundreds of years ago…Josephus, who described the incomparable beauty of the Gennesar valley, does not refer to the city by this name. It is therefore reasonable to assume that this city was much in decline in his day, and was overshadowed by the large neighboring city of Tiberius, which had just been established and drew many inhabitants…’(Guérin 1969: vol. VI. 211-212). Thus Guérin tried to suggest a single site identification to solve the riddle of the disappearance of two settlements that had given the lake in the Galilee their names over the course of many generations; Kinneret and Gennesar. The object of this article is to evaluate the literary sources, and present the archeological data, that provide support for part of Guérin’s intuitive conclusions,......

Words: 1774 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Beyond the Essene Hypothesis

...Essene Hypothesis does not suggest anything too radical regarding the Essene hypothesis; but, Boccaccini believes that the term “Qumran” and “Essene” should not be interchangeable with one another. Qumran was merely one example of an Essene settlement throughout the Palestinian area of that time. Comparing the historical writings of Jewish to non-Jewish authors, Boccaccini largely looks at the writings of Philo; the Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus; and Pliny the Elder for historiographical analysis. Boccaccini looks at the ancient historical writings and their examination of the location and extent of the Essenes, as well as the Essenes attitudes towards communal ownership and marriage. Boccaccini notices some discrepancies between the writings of Philo and Josephus, and Pliny and Dio. He reaches the conclusion that the Jewish writers (Philo and Josephus) seemed to be describing a network of Essene communities found in Palestine, while Pliny and Dio appear to describe a single Essene settlement near the Dead Sea. He argues that Josephus and Philo talked about a larger Essene movement that was not extremely isolated like the Qumran community. Boccaccini claims that Pliny and Dio focused specifically on the peculiarities of the Qumran community because they were interested in exotic information to convey to their respective audiences. This historiographical evidence leads Boccaccini to believe that Essene Judaism was a larger movement than what is described by most scholars......

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Rection Paper in Fcl

...rejecting life after death, while the Pharisees held to Rabbinic interpretations additional to the written texts.  Josephus indicates that the Pharisees received the backing and goodwill of the common people, apparently in contrast to the more elite Sadducees. Pharisees claimed prophetic or Mosaic authority for their interpretation of Jewish laws, while the Sadducees represented the authority of the priestly privileges and prerogatives established since the days of Solomon, when Zadok, their ancestor, officiated as High Priest. After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE Pharisaic beliefs became the basis for Rabbinic Judaism, which ultimately produced the normative traditional Judaism which is the basis for all contemporary forms of Judaism except for Karaism. Outside of Jewish history and writings, the Pharisees have been made notable by references in the New Testament to conflicts between themselves and John the Baptist and with Jesus. There are also several references in the New Testament to Paul of Tarsus being a Pharisee. Christian traditions have been a cause of widespread awareness of the Pharisees. SADDUCEES The Sadducees were a sect or group of Jews that were active in Ancient Israel during the Second Temple period, starting from the 2nd century BC through the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. The sect was identified by Josephus with the upper social and economic echelon of Judean society. As a whole, the sect fulfilled various political,......

Words: 1119 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Christian Evidences

...than all men. 20But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. 24Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. This lesson is to examine the works of non-biblical writers to prove the historical Jesus existed. Two Jewish sources: Flavius Josephus and the Talmud Six Early Pagan (Gentile) Writers Cornelius Tacitus, Pliny the younger, Lucian, Thallus, Mara Bar-Serapion and Suetonius 1. Cornelius Tacitus (b.52/4AD) - Usually rated the greatest historian of Rome, and when reporting on Emperor Nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that destroyed Rome in A.D. 64, the Roman historian Tacitus wrote: “Consequently to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class (of people) hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus (latin for Christ), from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of our......

Words: 2102 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Explore the View That Lukes Only Purpose Was to Write from an Historical Account

...accounts he has investigated before composing them on his own behalf; this would therefore suggest a later rather than earlier date for Luke. In the book of acts Paul is made out to be an heroic and idealised figure in the time of the early church, for someone who was portrayed to be quite a controversial person who was not one of the twelve apostles must have had some time to develop and prove themselves to come across as heroic or idealised person of the church. The last argument was that the gospel of Luke was written in the AD180’s there is evidence that Luke used Josephus `Antiquities of the Jews’ which was written around AD94 where it has been argued there for it could not have been written in the AD80’s or the AD60’s. This means that is Josephus wrote this around AD94 that means Luke would have had the access to this around the early second century. There is no clear evidence showing that Luke depended on Josephus as there are significant differences where they overlap with each other. In the book of acts there are similarities between the mid second century of Justin martyr; however the supposed similarities can be better explained by Luke’s influence on Justin. The second-century heretic Marcion round about AD140 used an early addition of Luke’s gospel which was later expanded to make the Luke’s gospel that we have today, however it is more likely that Marcion altered the gospel of Luke that we have today for his purpose. A second century date for Luke’s gospel......

Words: 1006 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Understanding Jesus of Nazareth: a Review of Graham Stanton’s the Gospels and Jesus

...worshipped as a “Savior” figure. Wells maintains that before 150 CE, there is no independent non-Christian support for the existence of Jesus and that the authors of the four New Testament gospels invented their traditions about the life of Jesus. As Stanton argues, this does not entirely make sense, since it is difficult to find signs of the convictions, emphases, and conflicts of the Christians of that period in the canonical gospels. Stanton continues to refer to sources outside of the gospels such as the non-Christian writings of the Roman historian Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, Suetonius, and satirist Lucian of Samosata. He also investigates the writings of Jewish historian Josephus, which alludes to Jesus as “the so-called Christ,” as well as to James, the brother of Jesus. With the exception of Josephus, Jewish writings say little about Jesus. Finally, Stanton closes the chapter by writing of the archeological evidence and discoveries in Galilee and Jerusalem and makes note of the difficulty in accessing neutral, unambiguous evidence. ​Chapter 9, “Assessing the Evidence,” is closely related to the previous chapter in that Stanton systematically examines the evidence set forth by the evangelists in order to continue the pursuit for the historical Jesus. He opens the chapter by describing the customary “three quests” for the historical Jesus and then dismisses these divisions by indicating that “the life and teaching of Jesus have never faltered” and goes on to......

Words: 3206 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Ehtiopians at the Holy Sepulcher

...after he chooses not to reign in Israel with his father Solomon. Though Menelik’s mother rules Ethiopia he was also heir after Solomon's death to the Throne of Israel, which was moved into Ethiopia because he originally choose to return to his mother in Ethiopia This is where the digging and the opening of the Suez Canal (in 1869), plays a vital role in understanding the relationship between Israeli and the Ethiopian people. Essentially this man-made lake or body of water that extends from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, the section of the world now known as the 'Middle East' was actually considered a part of Africa. It was simply the Northeastern most corner of the continent of Africa. The first-century C.E. Jewish historian Flavius Josephus relates an incredible story in which Moses, in his first act as an adult, leads an army of Egyptians and Hebrews against the Ethiopians, or Cushites, and ends up marrying an Ethiopian princess named Tharbis (Jewish Antiquities 2.10-11).During the 18th, 19th and 20th Egyptian dynasties (1552-1069 B.C.E.), Cush (Ethiopia) was under direct Egyptian control and basically part of Egypt. There were thousands of Cushites in Egypt, and they permeated all levels of society (Daniel Hays, "The Cushites: A Black Nation in Ancient History).During this time, there were no geographic, geological, cultural, racial or otherwise empirical barriers that separated the two lands. African empires, trade routes, civilization and environmental terrain were......

Words: 1416 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Relevalation

...criteria 1. The data are strongly evidenced. 2. The data are granted by virtually all scholars on the subject, even the skeptical ones The minimal fact approach to the resurrection question is. Jesus died by crucifixion It was reported in all four gospels that Jesus was executed by crucifixion. Even some none-Christian sources report the event as well such as historians as Josephus, Taticutus, Lucian, Talmud all agreed to Jesus death by crucifixion is a historical fact support by considerable evidence. Tacitus referred to it as “the extreme penalty”. Josephus writes when Pilate, upon hearing him accused by men of highest standing among us, had him condemned to death. Talmud reports that on the eve of Passover Yeshu was hanged. Lucian poked fun at the followers of Christ calling them “poor wretches” who revealed their gullibility. The above accounts refute any claim that Jesus was not crucified. Eyewitnesses: Jesus mother and the woman. The centurion solider, the disciples and other that was there that day the solider that beat him. The accounts of the historians such as Josephus, Talmud, and Tacitus, Lucian could also attest to the eye witness of Jesus crucifixion. Jesus disciples believe that he rose and appeared to them 1. The disciples themselves claimed that the risen Jesus and appeared to them. The evidence is simply the disciples all of them stated he appeared to them. There is the oral testimonies and creeds the written works such as 1......

Words: 1857 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Arch. Possible Final Essay Questions

...themselves they built a reinforcement wall on the fortress but it wasn’t going to keep the Romans out - According to Josephus’s account Eleazar ben Yair, their leader gave a passionate speech and after all the people decided to commit suicide rather then to become Roman slaves - Josephus’s account is most likely not a first hand account so it is really unknown what actually happened on Masada -Roman General Silva led the siege on Masada. -Josephus writes account of what happened at Masada, but he may not be a primary source. Got info from 7 survivors of Masada siege. -Nachman Ben-Yehuda believes that something has been omitted from Josephus’ writings, and that Josephus does actually talk about 2 palaces at Masada, not one that scholars originally deciphered from his writings. He used different wordings for the palace that he describes, therefore leading Ben-Yehuda to believe that something was omitted. -no one really knows what happened to the bodies of people who either committed suicide or were killed by Romans -Josephus’ account supports belief that suicide occurred. -they surrounded the fortress and built camps and a siege ramp. 4) Discuss First Jewish Revolt and Siege of Jerusalem -66 CE Vespasian is the Roman General who led his army against the first Jewish revolt-ends in disaster 70 CE. Legio XII Fulminata marched away from Jerusalem and was attacked in the valley-they were annihilated and lost their “Eagle” -Year 69CE there were 4......

Words: 1328 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Shabbat Law and the Essenes

...“Observe the Sabbath day to keep it holy” (Deut. 5:12) Rules concerning the Sabbath in Damascus Document (CD 10:14-11:18) reveal how meticulously and methodically the Essenes observed the Sabbath. This trait is also testified in other Second Temple texts such as Josephus’ Jewish War, Philo’s Every Good Man is Free, and the Book of Jubilees. Philo remarks that for the Essenes “that day has been set apart to be kept holy, and on it they abstain from all other work” (Every Good Man is Free 12 §81), and Josephus depicts them as the most strict observers of Sabbath among all Jews: “They are stricter than all Jews in abstaining from work on the seventh day; for not only do they prepare their food on the day before, to avoid kindling a fire on that one, but they do not venture to remove any vessel or even to go to stool” (Jewish War II §147). Furthermore in the Book of Jubilees, it is recorded that the consequence of defiling the Sabbath is death: “Let everyone who will do any work therein die. And also whoever defiles it let him surely die” (Jub. 2:25). It also contains a list of forbidden activities on the Sabbath (Jub. 2:17-31; 50:6-13), which is similar to the list in CD 10:14-11:18. One finds coinciding prohibitions in both lists; however the list in CD is more strict and comprehensive, containing extra measures. The Book of Jubilees proclaims that “whoever will discuss a matter that he will do on it so that he might make on it a journey for any buying or selling” (Jub. 50:8)...

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Evidence for Jesus

...miracles. So they try to find ways to justify the words they read. Furthermore, after Jesus’ recorded death, a number of public and private accounts began to emerge. Public records and letters documented from historians and officials: Josephus, Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, Suetonius as well as writings in the Talmud all mention the existence of Jesus. (Did Jesus Live). “Over 24,000 copies of early New Testament manuscripts are known to be in existence today” (Steel). Some might be skeptical about having so many “copies of copies of copies”, but Bruce Metzger made a good point when he said, “having multiple copies that match closely with one another can help you cross-check to with what the original was like” (76). These multiple copies of the New Testament, along with written sermons, letters, and other writings from early church fathers all help provide proven documentary evidence (76). “On the whole, the gospels are excellent sources. As a matter of fact, they are the most trustworthy, complete, and reliable sources for Jesus”, said scholar, Edwin M. Yamauchi (100). In addition, to Corroborate or better confirm the testimonies of the gospels there were other references to Jesus; Josephus and Tacitus, who were both first-century historians. Josephus was a well-known scholar back in his day, but not known by many today (101). He commanded the Jewish armies of the Galilee, but surrendered to the Roman general Vespasian; deciding it wasn’t in God’s will for him to commit......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Jesus Existed

...Christus to describe Christ because he knows using Jesus Christ, some will question his accuracy and the threat of impeachment. With his knowledge of Jesus’ history, and his recounting of these events, in comparison to how they were written in the gospel, were so closely related, this is another proof of Jesus’ existence (Van Voorst pgs. 39 – 51). Along with Tacitus, Josephus, a Jewish historian who wrote several surviving books towards the end of the first century. His writings are the earliest independent accounts of Jesus. Josephus lived through the Jews war, became a translator and interpreter, and learned of Jesus when living in Galilee. In his two most famous writings, The History of the Jews War and The Antiquities of the Jews; he referenced Jesus twice in The Antiquities, the most famous is “Testimonium Flavianum.” He wrote about Jesus living and winning over many Jews and Greeks. He talks about Jesus and Pilate, and His crucifixion. He mentions how Jesus’ disciples are still faithful Christians (Stein pgs. 29 – 31). Josephus’ writings are important because they support the gospels, without Josephus’ knowledge of those spoken words. In Lee Strobel’s book, The Case for Christ, Lee asks tough-minded questions and provides scientific evidence regarding Jesus’ existence. Even skeptics, including himself, were swayed by his findings. Strobel interviewed a theology professor, a law professor, philosophy professors and ministers. In these interviews,......

Words: 2308 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Jesus and Mohammed

...historically can be challenging due to the fact that there are some scientist that post relatively strong arguments that there is very little historical proof of the life of Jesus outside of the Bible, and Mohammed beyond word of mouth transfer via the Quran. Although and despite the gaining evidence which disputes the factual proof against either of these prophets/son of God being legitimate, the evidence. shreds of evidence that is for Jesus and Mohammed is also evident. Some of the facts relating to Jesus historically include the Jewish historian Josephus who was born in approximately 37 CE, notice the “CE” because at this point cultures had not begun using BC and or AC. Josephus was caught and held capture by the Romans and at that time had wrote very in depth about details concerning Jewish history and it was these writings that have indeed been confirmed by archaeological discoveries. This Jewish historian, Josephus, made two brief references to Jesus that may or may not have been given a positive point of view by current following Christian copy lists, nevertheless these two references are not regarded as actual solid proof that Jesus actually did exist. Most historians have made note that Jesus was most likely born a couple to a few years prior to what is currently know and referred to as the Common Era. Christian monks were said to have figured out Jesus in a time related fashion and seemed to be off and miscalculated slightly. Most Traditional Christians still...

Words: 1751 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Essay

...are a couple of locations that seem to have been used for baptisms. What did John the Baptist do?: Today baptism is associated with Jesus, but nowhere in the gospels is he shown baptizing anyone. John the Baptist, however, is depicted as participating in what might have been a very popular activity. According to gospel accounts, he preached that simply being descended from Abraham wasn’t enough for salvation; only repentance and a renunciation of any privileges based upon lineage or election would suffice. Did John the Baptist exist?: The existence of John the Baptist is disputed. The only extra-biblical mention of him is found in Josephus’ Antiquities and is arguably an interpolation — a later addition by someone else — which tells a different story from the one in the gospels. If Josephus is accurate, then the gospels are not; if Josephus is not accurate, then the basis for thinking that John the Baptist existed (and hence that the gospels are accurate) is undermined. Why was John the Baptist important?: Some scholars suspect that Jesus could have been a follower of John the Baptist who went off on his own to create a new religious movement. If this were the case, then it’s only natural that Jesus’ followers would need to make theirs appear to be the more important of the two groups. There definitely appears to be such a concern in the gospels: Mark makes John the Baptist still seem important, Matthew has John the Baptist acknowledge Jesus’ superiority, and Luke......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3