Gospel Necessity vs. Law Expediency

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By jkeuch
Words 2274
Pages 10
There was no doubt about it, by most any standard Saul was good. In his letter to the Philippians, Paul describes himself likes this: if anyone else thinks he has reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for legalistic righteousness, faultless. In short, Saul had all the credentials that you could ever ask for in a religious person. And he made sure that these principles by which he lived were enforced. His preaching was a preaching that was unambiguous as to its expectations. Moreover, these expectations had “teeth” in them. They were enforced and held accountable by laws and rules strictly enforced. That’s what Saul was doing one day as he made his way to a town called Damascus. Armed with letters from the high priest giving him authority to arrest any who opposed him, Saul made his way to Damascus with the intent of taking prisoner as many Christians as he could. These people were going to know the rules. And they would obey...or else. You’ve got to admit, there is a certain appeal to that line of thought. It really simplifies things. All you have to do is say, “these are the laws...these are the rules, and if you don’t follow them, then we will impose this or that sanction on you.” It’s so simple; and all the while one can readily assume and heartily believe that he is engaged in doing what God wants him to do. That’s what Saul thought too. But then, Saul suddenly found himself surrounded by a bright light that literally knocked him to the ground. And a voice cried out to him, Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? The voice was none other than that of Jesus. So far from doing God’s will, Saul haply found himself in direct opposition to God. Now it is…...

Similar Documents

The Gospel Lessons

...Lessons Through the Gospels The Gospels are firsthand accounts of the life of Yeshua. Yeshua was a teacher, a Rabbi, sinless and pure. Yeshua desperately wants all of us to know who He is and to live our lives according to God. The lessons Yeshua teaches throughout the Bible leave no page unturned and no room for our imagination. Yeshua taught on ever aspect of what it is to live righteously and what is required of us to enter the Kingdom of God. While every lesson is applicable to my life, as they are for every person, there are a few distinct lessons that speak to me loudly and grab my attention. In Matthew 6:25-34 Jesus Teaches about Worry, I choose this lesson because it is something I struggle with on a daily basis. There seems to be something new to worry about each day, and even parts of life I know I should not worry about I still find myself stressing about. With the economy being down there are a ton of worries in life that I have never had to deal with before. I do worry about what clothes my son will wear or what the clothes I wear look like. I work in the fashion industry but live on a less than fashionable budget, which makes me worry what other insiders say about what I wear. I should be thankful for everything I have and not worry about what I do not have because I know God will provide. Psalms 23 comes to mind when I am worrying and I pray it often: Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, [a] I will fear no......

Words: 1458 - Pages: 6

Fluent Programming vs Law of Demeter

...Fluent or Law of Demeter? Serban Gavrus Abstract The Law of Demeter is one of the most widely known programming principle, it‟s easy to respect and it assures some important code quality aspect. It can be briefly defined as “use only one dot”. Fluency is a popular choice for implementing interfaces because it adds readability and ease of use. Method chaining and fluency are in practice inseparable. These two aspects of programming seem to be contradictory, one can‟t have both. This essay argues that fluency and LoD can coexist and in the case where the developer must sacrifice one for the other, there is no clear rule to follow. 1.1 Law of Demeter The Law of Demeter was proposed by Ian Holland in 1987. It‟s a programming rule that applies to how methods are written, whose purpose is to assure a good programming style. It‟s been created as a metric to asses the quality of an object-orientated program. The direct purpose of the law is to condense several OOP principles(coupling control, information hiding, information restriction, information localization, structural induction) into a simple and easy to follow rule. The indirect purpose is to ensure loose coupling and stricter modularity. [1] The Law of Demeter is intended to be a guideline, not an absolute restriction. Misunderstanding and blindly following this law can lead to poorer code. [1] The law states that an object “A” should not access an object “B”, retrieved by calling a method of another object “C”, of...

Words: 1444 - Pages: 6

Gospel

...The Christian gospel is defined as good news from the translation of “Greek euangelion: g d, good + spel, news” in the American Heritage Dictionary. However, people in our country have diverse views of Christianity and the gospel. I know from personal experience that the Bible scares some people. I am still not comfortable enough in my own testimony that I can easily have a discussion with fellow Christians for fear of them seeing how much I don’t know. Many people view the people who present the gospel as fanatics and turn away from the gospel before they can even hear the news of salvation contained within. The gospel is rejected by many as they feel it infringes on their rights. For example, some sections of our culture are taught that the option of abortion is the woman’s right to choose, not a moral question. If they were to hear the Word of God and become saved, they would ‘lose’ that right. Someone who has experienced a recent loss of a loved one to cancer or some other horrific death may question the Word. They may ask how a loving God could allow such suffering and pain. Their emotions can block the Word from entering their heart. There are some who attempt to reason away the miracles of the Bible. They try to use their intellect to defeat any argument a Christian has as to the validity of the claims of the Bible. They have been taught to believe in scientific answers for everything, such as evolution versus creation. A Christian should know...

Words: 325 - Pages: 2

Law Traditional vs Nontraditional

...Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation LAW/531 April 15, 2013 Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks. A Formal Process In a traditional litigation the process is very......

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Casinos vs. Card Counters: the Law and Reality

...Casinos vs. Card Counters: The Law and Reality Contents Page Description 3 Introduction 4 Card Counting Systems 4 MIT Blackjack Team 5 Is Card Counting Legal? 6 The Right to Ban Skilled Players 7 Casino Countermeasures 7 Griffin Investigations, Inc. 9 Face Recognition Systems 9 Bloodhound Blackjack Monitoring System 10 Changing the Rules 12 “Backrooming” 13 Conclusion 14 References Blackjack is the only casino game that when played perfectly has odds in favor of the player instead of the house. The only way to play blackjack perfectly is to use a strategy called card counting, where a player will keep track of the number of high cards and low cards that have been used from a deck to give them a better idea of what card valuesvalue cards may come out next. Because of this casino operators have over the years attempted to get legislation passed to have card counting made illegal, then lobbied to have the law on their side to allow them to barban known card counters from their casinos. Card counting was devised in the 1950’s by a group of blackjack experts and mathematicians. This will swing the odds from 10% or so in the favor of the house to a 2% advantage for the player. Even though it is a very small number of players who can master this very difficult system, the casinos have always attempted to find new ways to make sure that these experts were not able to keep the odds in their favors. The casino considerscasinos consider...

Words: 2907 - Pages: 12

Theory vs Law

...Theory/Law Many Students tend to intermingle the two terms law and theory. A law can be explained as a tested observation that has perfect reliability without explanation of the origin. It is the knowledge of something in nature but without the explanation of how it came to be. For instance the Universal Law of Gravitation is a principle regularity of how two particles attract each other. Whereas a theory may be explained as an extension of a hypothesis intended to explain something in nature. For example The Big Bang Theory is a hypothesis that has gained attention and evidence to support it. Mayonnaise Experiment In my double blind study to test my hypothesis that mayonnaise facials cause warts in humans I will have two different groups, my control group and experimental group. The subjects who get the Mayonnaise facials will be in the experimental group and the subjects who receive a traditional facial crème will be the control group. The doctor or scientist in charge should not be informed of which group is the receiving the mayonnaise facials, this will cause neither the subject nor the researchers to form any unconscious bias. The experiment should consist of multiple races to show any other variables. This experiment will last one month with weekly reports from the subjects based on how the experiment is going if there are any side effects or if the facial seems to be working. FDA does not label milk that has been produced with hormone treatment. Since:...

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Disqualified Director: Malaysia's Law vs Uk's Law

...Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Body 4 Definition of directors 4 Definition of disqualified directors 4 Circumstances for disqualification of directors 5 i. Undischarged bankruptcy (section 125) 5 ii. Convicted of crimes (section 130) 5 ii. Disqualification in insolvent companies (section 130A) 6 Comparison of penalty or punishment of disqualified director under Malaysia’s Law and United Kingdom’s (UK) Law 6 Example of cases involve directors disqualification in UK and Malaysia 7 Case 1 7 Case 2 8 Conclusion 10 Abstract Director is one of the important people in the conducting of a company. Without them, the company cannot be operated and all matters concerning the company cannot be carried out. At present, when a company fall or declared bankruptcy, the director become a disqualified director and cannot be a director in other companies as they may cause a similar incident recurring. According to this matter, the punishment of the disqualified director in Malaysia is fixed to 5 years which in major or minor case and must pay a fine RM100, 000.00 or both. They can’t be a director of other company just because they fail to exercise their duties and caused they commit a major or minor cases in a long time period. This paper aim to examine whether the punishment of disqualified director can be implementing or change in Malaysia compare to other country. Introduction In Malaysia, the situation which the person who tend to be a......

Words: 2904 - Pages: 12

Adversary System vs, Civil Law Method

...ADVERSARY SYSTEM vs. CIVIL LAW METHOD   “The goal of both the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system is to find the truth. But the adversarial system seeks the truth by pitting the parties against each other in the hope that competition will reveal it, whereas the inquisitorial system seeks the truth by questioning those most familiar with the events in dispute. The adversarial system places a premium on the individual rights of the accused, whereas the inquisitorial system places the rights of the accused secondary to the search for truth.” This, taken from a website I found on a comparison of the adversary system vs. the inquisitorial (or civil) system of justice. By definition, theadversary system isthe system of law that relies on the contest between each advocate representing his or her party's positions to an impartial person or group of people, usually a jury or judge, trying to determine the truth of the case. By contrast, in the inquisitorial system, the judgeactively steers the search for evidence and questions the witnesses, including the respondent or defendant. Attorneys play a more passive role, suggesting routes of inquiry for the presiding judge and following the judge's questioning with questions of their own. The questioning done by the attorney is often brief because the judge tries to ask all relevant questions. With the adversarial system of law, the side with the “best case” or best presentation to the court usually prevails. During this......

Words: 971 - Pages: 4

Public vs Private Law

...Public laws are any laws conducted by the state and federal laws. These laws are conducted by a branch called legislative. Private laws are a set of rules agreed upon by two parties. Public law and private laws are two totally different things. Private laws can become public laws if a contract or agreement is breached. Public laws have to be followed by everyone within in the state. There are severe consequences if the laws aren’t followed. An example of public laws includes criminal laws such as murder. Private laws would be signing a contract for a cell phone and you just completely stop paying the bill. This would be a breach of contract and you can get sued. By being sued it becomes a public law. Public laws and private laws are different by are related. In August 2002, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a rule giving patients certain rights to control their own personal health information. The rule also describes what health workers need to do to protect the privacy of their patients’ health information. The rule, known as the Privacy Rule, is part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. The Privacy Rule protects patient health information by placing limits on how patient information can be used or disclosed (shared with others). The rule applies to any health care workers who send patient health information to others electronically. (Thomas P. Christensen). The only time its ok for a health information......

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Law: Corporate Necessity

...proposed law can be attacked on the basis of pragmatism as ineffective. It does not even discuss, let alone define, an enforcement mechanism or penalties for non-compliance. The proposal would be an enforcement nightmare, exacerbating an already bad situation where many laws are poorly enforced in India and further undermining respect for law. Curiously, the proposal even includes a loophole. If the 2 percent allocation is not made in a given fiscal year, the CSR committee has to submit an explanation to avoid being penalized. There is no discussion of what explanations would be legally valid, opening up much room for corruption and extortion. While India has experienced rapid economic growth, the benefits of this growth have not been distributed equitably. Inequality, which was already high, has increased even more. India's Gini coefficient, the official measure of income inequality, has gone up from 0.32 to 0.38 in the last two decades. For example, about 50 percent of children in India are malnourished due to pervasive poverty. Trickle-down economics are not working. The proposed law does not go far enough in reducing inequality and helping the disadvantaged. Without a coercive enforcement mechanism, it is unlikely that the law will result in widespread compliance. In other words, “mandatory” CSR will remain largely voluntary. Many activities that companies undertake are both profitable and good for society. Companies would undertake these activities regardless of the......

Words: 324 - Pages: 2

Necessity

...NECESSITY LAW THE GENERAL RULE Necessity arises where a defendant is forced by circumstances to transgress the criminal law. The generally accepted position is that necessity cannot be a defence to a criminal charge. The leading case is: * R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273. The defendants and a cabin boy were cast adrift in a boat following a shipwreck. The defendants agreed that as the cabin boy was already weak, and looked likely to die soon, they would kill him and eat him for as long as they could, in the hope that they would be rescued before they themselves died of starvation. A few days after the killing they were rescued and then charged with murder. The judges of the Queen's Bench Division held that the defendants were guilty of murder in killing the cabin boy and stated that their obvious necessity was no defence. The defendants were sentenced to death, but this was commuted to six months' imprisonment. * Lord Coleridge CJ, having referred to Sir Matthew Hale's assertion (The History of the Pleas of the Crown, 1736) that a man was not to be acquitted of theft of food on account of his extreme hunger, doubted that the defence of necessity could ever be extended to a defendant who killed another to save his own life. After referring to the Christian aspect of actually giving up one's own life to save others, rather than taking another's life to save one's own, he referred to the impossibility of choosing between the value of one person's life and......

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Gospel Presentation

...Oliver Metzler GLST 220-D02 “Gospel Presentation” December 13, 2015 Background Information The person whom I intend to share the Gospel with is my friend Drew Harmatz. We have been friends now for over three years and over that time grown to be really good friends. Even though we are good friends we do not share the same beliefs. Drew is Jewish and has chosen to stick with his birth religion because he likes the Jewish moral compass. Basically, he has expressed that he feels the Jewish culture is more peaceful and presents a better moral basis than that of any other religion. While we have talk of God, Christ, and the Bible; I have never tried to relay the Gospel to him. Elements of Communication There are a couple key points I must understand when trying to communicate the Gospel to Drew. The first thing I should do is try and relate to him as Paul did. Paul stated in 1 Corinthians 9:20 that in order to win over the Jews he must become a Jew. Jews and Christian both hold the Old testament as truth and I should start with trying to embark on common ground. The written Torah that Jews reads are actually the first 5 books of the Bible. This is a great way to relate and attempt to break down the walls. Using common ground is one way, another would be to relate the Jewish and Christian moral compass to him. Drew relates the moral compass of Christians to the history that has been documented and not to what the scripture writes. In order to do this, I would need......

Words: 1237 - Pages: 5

Why Gun Control Laws in the Us Are a Necessity

...51:15-51:48). Since the United States has the highest number of deaths, it is important to have gun-control laws that restrict people from owning dangerous firearms like machine guns. Gun-control laws should support both sides of the debate. Of course, both sides will not be completely happy with the laws created, but America should have a balance. In 2008, a poll was taken stating: “Adult poll respondents’ views on the meaning of the Second Amendment; An individual’s right to bear arms: Republican 51% and Democrats 41%” (The History of the Right to Bear Arms). Today, the United States is more divided on gun-control than it has ever been. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”(Milestones in Federal Gun Control Legislation). Unless the Second Amendment is changed, we cannot take the right from others to own guns. However, the government should regulate the types of gun Americans can own and who can own a gun because times have changed and American’s mental health system is broken. Decades ago, the United States was once a country where a gun was considered to survive and protect. “As Americans civilized the wilderness, they would eventually be able to rely not just on their own skills at individual self-defense for protection, but on laws and civil authorities and the other institutions of government they were building ” ( Whitney, Pg.......

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6

Law: a Social Necessity

...Is law a necessary evil? Absolutely yes. Many of us do not like the complete bureaucracy that the legal system is, and equal among us despise lawyers. Nevertheless, all of these roles within the legal system have a purpose, and the legal system as a whole is necessary. For as long as there has been civilization, there has been law in one form or another. From the Code of Hammurabi to the Geneva Conventions, law has existed in some way, shape or form since the beginning of recorded history. The reason it still exists is that we absolutely need it for the development and progress of our society. If law were not necessary, it would have simply ceased to be applied and practiced. In the present day law plays unlimited importance in how our society is structured, stratified and regulated. In the present day, without law Canada as well as the rest of the world would decline into complete anarchy and disarray almost immediately. One such reason that we need law to maintain order is that humans are inherently a vicious and hostile being and that law and fear of punishment is required to keep these primal desires in check. Another such factor for the necessity of law is that left to themselves in a natural environment, humans need not be governed by law. However when humans participate in a society, law is required to ensure a stable and safe society for all member. This stable and safe social environment is paramount to the nurture and upbringing of humans and without it,......

Words: 3015 - Pages: 13

Gospel

...What are some ways the Christian gospel is perceived in our culture In our culture today, people believe that they can accept Jesus as their personal Savior, but do not have to follow Him. They feel if they are saved, they can still do what they want and not have any punishment for what they have done. People want to be saved, but they also want to live their life how they want to. Our whole legal system is based off/on the bible. Think of it in the worldview perspective: How far can you drive without passing some form of church? What are some specific moral reasons people may reject the Christian gospel A lot of people who reject the Bible on moral reasons do so because of all the hurt and slavery that our God has allowed. Most civilized people believe slavery is immoral; however, the Lord allowed it, “therefore the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he sold them into the hand of Chushanrishathaim king of Mesopotamia and the children of Israel served Chushanrishathaim eight years” (Judges 3:8 King James Version), “So the children of Israel served Eglon the king of Moab eighteen years” (Judges 3:14). God also ordered women and children killed, “Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children; and women” (Ezekiel 9:6). There are so many verses where the Bible talks about killing man, woman, and child. Also, the bible talks about killing people for homosexuality as well as worshipping false prophets. The Bible also talks about killing women......

Words: 954 - Pages: 4