Flaws of Compatibilism

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By blaine
Words 1190
Pages 5
Problems of Philosophy
Essay #1

Compatibilism, the belief that one can be entirely free and wholly responsible for one’s actions regardless of the fact that those actions have been predetermined by a previous chain of events, is flawed in its definition of free will and remains contradictory with determinist views. If one is to maintain a determinist perspective, then it is logical to believe that we cannot be held morally accountable for our actions since we lack the free will to carry them out. If you are unable to exercise your free will, it does not exist.

Many argue that a distinct classification of the words “free will” do not exist; thus, if the words are void of one true meaning, it is not possible to brand any definition of it as wrong or “flawed”. In response, those words may be associated with several different meanings, however, it is still possible to scrutinize each definition within its context as opposed to picking apart the general idea. For example, compatibilists classify free will as the ability to make decisions and choices that one is not coerced to make. These choices are based on desires and beliefs. This specific view supports the notion that even though every single one of our actions has already been accounted for and predetermined, the fact that you could make another choice (regardless of whether or not you do) validates the fact that free will does indeed exist. For instance, suppose that you reading this paper at this very moment was preordained and imprinted into the history of the course of events of the universe. Although all things inside of you compel you to keep reading, the mere possibility that you could stop, the very thought that you have an option other than to continue would vindicate the concept of self-determination. Therefore, compatibilists contend that one can believe in both the concept of determinism and the…...

Similar Documents

Pentium Flaw

...PENTIUM FLAW By Michael Carreathers Facts The “Pentium Flaw” was discovered June nineteenth nineteen nighty four by Professor Thomas Nicely. Basically Thomas was adding a Pentium system to some computers when he noticed some calculations were wrong. He then contacted Intel and told them about the problem. Ironically the person he contacted at Intel already knew about the problem but never said anything. He then contacted people to see if they were also having the same problem. After a couple days Thomas wasn’t the only person who realized there was a problem. People around the world who had access to the internet found this out. The diversion result from Pentium was off by sixty one parts per million. Intel then was forced to tell people about this hiccup but said that it was of little importance and that it wouldn’t affect most people in a big way. Even though this was most likely true it made everyone feel like they messed up and nobody wants something that doesn’t work how it’s supposed to even if it’s off a little. Intel then felt the need to tell customers that if there Pentium chip was flawed in any way they would replace it with Pentium chips that were flawless. Not a lot of people even bothered to replace their chips at all. In, nineteen nighty five Intel had to pay four hundred seventy five million because of the flawed processors. My Opinion My opinion on the “Pentium Flaw” is that it is a complete outrage. I feel personally that I love electronics and......

Words: 374 - Pages: 2


...Unit 5 10/21/13 Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium microprocessor. Dr. Thomas professor of mathematics discovered the bug. He then tried to send intel a email about it and was waiting for a response. When there was no response after a few days he then went to the internet to spread the word of the bug he had found. Posting it on the internet the word got out fast and when the word got back to Intel they said “it was minor and not even a erratum”. The New York Times then wrote a peace on the matter and Intel resulted in a $500 million charge against Intel’s 1994 revenue. Intel thought that the error would not affect many people and then decided not to tell anyone outside of the company because of the few people that did find out they lost billions of dollars and people thought of them to be hiding a sinister secret and to be untrustworthy. If the same thing was to happen again today I would hope they would respond to the emails and not just tell them they will just fix the ones that people can prove that there is a flaw with it. I hope they can handle it better before they let it get out the way they did before and try to fix it before it will cost billions of dollars to fix. If it was to happen agin to where they kept it a secret and did not admit they are wrong I think people would stop trusting them all together and stop buying their products and they would fall bankrupt....

Words: 282 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Pentium Flaw The Pentium Microprocessor is the widest selling personal computers on the market. Intel created the 486DX and the Pentium chip that included Floating point unit (FPU). This FPU was known as a math co-processor. The problem arose in the fall of 1994, all the new Pentium chips were manufactured with an error in the FPU system. This error was in the FPU instructions for the division. This caused the chip to divide certain numbers incorrectly. Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium processor. But instead of assessing this problem they simply ignored it and thought that the customers would not ever notice the flaw. Thomas Nicely discovered this problem also when he was computing the sum of large reciprocals of prime numbers on his Pentium base computer. Later on Thomas emailed Intel and told them that there was a flaw in the co-processor. Intel never responded back so he took it to his own hands and posted the flaw online, asking other people to check for the flaw also on other users computers. Many people responded back and the news got involved sooner or later Intel started receiving more and more emails about the flaw. A common Known error was 4195825/3145727 dividing those numbers gave an incorrect answer to the problem. Intel’s response to this flaw was to replace Pentium chip microprocessor to whoever could explain the flaw to them. This angered man of the customers so Intel responded by replacing......

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Intel’s famed technical prowess was not without mishaps. Its greatest mistake was the so-called “Pentium flaw,” in which an obscure segment among the Pentium CPU’s 3.1 million transistors performed division incorrectly. Company engineers discovered the problem after the product’s release in 1993 but decided to keep quiet and fix the problem in updates to the chip. However, In 1994 American mathematician Thomas Nicely was using a personal computer equipped with the then new Pentium chip from the Intel Corporation when he discovered a flaw in the chip that was producing inconsistent results in his calculations of Brun’s constant. Negative publicity from the mathematics community led Intel to offer free replacement chips that cost them millions of dollars in revenue. My analysis of the way the Intel Corporation handled the Pentium flaw of the 90's was irresponsible. They seemed to basically dismiss that there would be noticeable problems that could affect the user with their computer. Although in most cases this assumption is correct, it still shows a great deal of dishonestly from the company because it seemed as if Intel tried to cover it up. I feel that Intel was lazy and simply not willing to fix the problem that they created due to cost concerns. If I were to sell a bicycle to someone knowing the breaks were faulty, causing occasional break failure, I think people would be pretty upset and I would most likely be sued for sub sequential harm caused. On December 20, 1994,...

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

The Pentium Flaw

...The Pentium Flaw Unit 5 Analasyis 1 The Pentium flaw is that on certain input data, the floating point divide instructions on the Pentium processor produce inaccurate results. Intel quoted an error rate of about 1 in 8.77*10^9 random divisions. The exact frequency depends on the type and precision of the operands; single-precision reciprocals, for example, are always returned correctly. (Nicely, 2011) This was first reported by Professor Thomas Nicely in October of 1994 by computing the sum of the reciprocals of a large collection of prime numbers on his Pentium-based computer. (Nicely, 2011) Checking his computation, he found the result differed significantly from theoretical values. He got correct results by running the same program on a computer with a 486 CPU, and finally he tracked the error to the Pentium itself. (Janeba, 1995) Pentium originally refused to replace the faulty chips unless the user proved a need for high end computations as the flaw is rare and data-dependent. Although they did eventually agree to replace the product for any who requested it. (Janeba, 1995) I believe that Intel made several mistakes with the handling of this first, releasing a the product that was not 100% accurate all of the time into the market, secondly not heeding Professor Nicely when he advised them of the issue, and third by refusing at least initially to replace the faulty processors. The combination of these injured Intel, both in their reputation in the......

Words: 339 - Pages: 2

The Pentium Flaw

...Collin Pannell Warwick NT 1110 October 22, 2013 The Pentium Flaw During the year of 1994 one of Intel’s processors called the Pentium microprocessor chip had a small flaw inside the chip. These Pentium processors included something new called a floating-point unit, which is also know as a math coprocessor. These Pentium processors had this floating-point unit built into the processors, which makes them much faster. These chips that were made had errors on the floating-point unit that corrupted instructions for division. This cased the Floating-point unit to divide certain floating-point numbers incorrectly. This Pentium flaw was most know from an equation solved by Tim Coe of Vitesse Semiconductors. The number he tried to divide was 4195835 by 3145727. The value that was outputted by the computer was incorrect by 0.006%. Thomas Nicely, a math professor at Lynchburg College was computing the sum of the reciprocals of a large collection of prime numbers on one of Intel’s Pentium-based computers. He calculated the same equation on a different program and then traced the problem back to the Pentium itself. Nicely contacted Intel and didn’t get any real response to the problem. He then posted on the Internet asking others to confirm the problem he had found. Nicely was interviewed with a magazine and CNN aired a story about by his findings. After Nicely’s findings, Intel publicly announced “an error is only likely to occur [about] once in nine billion random floating...

Words: 462 - Pages: 2

Can Compatibilism Be Defended?

...Can compatibilism be defended? Introduction This essay argues in favor of a compatibilist, that free will and determinism can co-exist. Consequently it will support the concept of compatibilism and determine that it can be defended. Two basic ideas will be outlined in this argument in support of this claim. Firstly, the notion of compatibilism, that actions can be both free and causally determined (Shabo, 2012; Sober, 2009). Secondly, it will be deliberated what it means to act freely. Followed by a reply, these counter arguments will also be discussed; Incompatibilists disagree with these ideas and believe that determinism is true and that no person has free will, this is called hard determinism. In addition, a libertarian’s point of view; that we are free and our actions are not causally determined (Sober, 2009). Furthermore, the trouble with determining what freewill is. Argument 1 Compatibilism is the idea that determinism is true; every event in the world has a cause, however, freewill can still exist. The aim of a compatibilist is to show that an act can be done freely if it has been caused a certain way (Sober, 2009). This leaves room for the idea that freedom doesn’t require the absence of causality, but rather, the right kind of causality (Millican, 2010; Sober, 2009). This makes reasonable sense because it is common knowledge that the way an individual acts and thinks has been determined by their genes and past experiences. Who the person is has been......

Words: 1458 - Pages: 6

Pentium Flaw

...Pentium Flaw The Pentium flaw was a bug within the Pentium CPU’s 3.1 million transistors that caused the transistors to perform division incorrectly. Intel’s engineers discovered the flaw after the product’s release in 1993 but chose to keep silent and attempt to correct the flaw in future updates to the processor chip. The flaw was discovered in 1994 by American mathematician Thomas Nicely. Nicely was using a personal computer equipped with Intel’s Pentium chip when he discovered a flaw in the chip that was producing inconsistent results in his calculations of Brun’s constant. Nicely informed Intel of the flaw, but after receiving no response he posted his finding on the internet. News of the bug spread quickly on the internet and then to the industry press. Intel’s statement that the bug was minor was not accepted by many computer users. After a spotlight of the flaw ran by The New York Times, Intel changed its postion and offered to replace every chip. Only a fraction of Pentium users bothered to have their chips replaced. I believe Intel handled the situation in a professional manner and gave customers reasonable options to have their chips replaced. I do not think the flaw in the chip affected most customers and had little effect to the common user. If the flaw was a major problem more people would have had issues and more chips would have been replaced. Intel did everything necessary to satisfy their customers. I believe if the same situation was to occur......

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Name: Ebere Uguru Student ID: 16389756 Course: NT1110T Computer Structure and Logic Unit 5 Analysis THE FLAW IN THE INTEL PROCESSOR CHIP Since computer evolution, various computer companies have made their marks on the shores of revolutionizing computer as we know it. Hence, Intel, one of the world’s computer company giants, is not an exception to the zeal of making computers more efficient as the world evolves with time. However in 1994, Intel was hit by a major setback related to a flaw in its P5 Pentium Floating Point Unit (FPU) rolled out that year. This defect was first discovered by Professor Thomas R. Nicely, a professor of Mathematics at Lynchburg College in Virginia. According to the chronology, Professor Nicely in his quest to perfecting codes to enumerate primes, twin primes, and prime quadruplets unraveled the incoherence in his calculation. This abnormally occurred only after he had added a collection of computers manufactured by Intel to his group of computers. At first, he was unable to eliminate this flaw due to other factors such as: motherboard, programming errors and chiplets. After series of attempts to bring the attention of Intel to this error proved abortive, Professor Nicely then went public with it, and his claim was concurred by other internet users using Intel computers. Out of concern for the ripple effects of admitting to this error as it is,......

Words: 872 - Pages: 4

Tragic Flaws

...Kaitlyn price [2a] April 15th, 2010 My Tragic Flaw I know everyone has one. A tragic flaw? Yes. I will admit…I do have one too. Mine? I am probably one of the most irritable human being you will know. It started a few years ago, I am assuming. Maybe around the time my brother was born which would make it seventh grade. I come from a big family; two brothers, a sister, myself, and my parents. Six people in a tiny house! Why yes, it is very loud. My mom has a low tolerance and I have inherited that from her. She constantly yells because she is stressed but what she fails to see is that it stresses me out too. Stress leads to another factor of why I am so irritable. I feel like I am always ‘on call’, meaning I feel that as soon as I sit down and get comfortable...my mom will call me again and again for help. She does not always call me but that is just how I feel; stressed. For me, irritability is a real issue. I would be constantly talked to in middle school for not paying attention in class and when I would be talked to I would have an attitude. Because I argued with the teachers, I would get detentions or they would send e-mails to my mom. When my mom would get an e-mail she would yell at me and I would yell back. Yelling back at my mom did not get me anywhere but in my room for the next few weeks. It seemed like I was always crying and being put on restriction. When I would be on restriction I would not have my phone. I never had any way of contacting my friends......

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Intel greatest mistake was the so-called “Pentium Flaw,” in which an obscure segment among the Pentium CPU’s 3.1 million transistors performed division incorrectly. In 1994 American mathematician Thomas Nicely was using a personal computer equipped with the then new Pentium chip from the Intel Corporation when he discovered a flaw in the chip that was producing inconsistent results. Intel isolated their flaw, so their solution was to keep the information within the company and not disclose the information to the public. Despite of the fact that the flaw did not affect all microprocessors, it actually only affected a very small number of customers, Intel should have openly acknowledged the problem. Later, after no responses Dr. Nicely answered back by on the internet which caused an uproar and everyone was informed quickly. This when Intel pronounce that there is a problem and that they would replace any of the malfunctioning and damage chips. Intel had to put aside $500,000,000 of the 1994 revenue just to be capable of replacing the processor that where bad. Nonetheless, if Intel had willingly acknowledge and informed the customers and businesses partners about the issue, it most likely would have saved them not only money but also their reputation between the company and their existing clients. Needless to say, their decision resulted in some very unhappy customers. If this same problem would have happen these days, the CPU Company would have collapse before it would have......

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Pentium Flaw The nature of the Pentium flaw was a “bug” that the processor could return incorrect decimal results which made this hard to calculate and get the correct answer. This affected the fields in mathematics and science where they have to deal with a lot of math. The flaw was discovered first by Intel but they did not act on the problem, but a professor from Lynchburg College, Virginia called Dr. Thomas R. Nicely discovered the problem around June 1994 he was the one that noticed it in two sets of numbers and did some tests on 486 and Pentium-based computers, Dr. Nicely was certain that the error is caused by the Pentium Processor. Dr. Nicely then contacts Intel Technical Support on October 24, 1994 Intel technical support then duplicates the problem and confirms it, but it was not reported before. Later the Intel person he had contacted admitted that Intel had been aware of the problem since May 1994, when the flaw was discovered by Tom Kraljevic. When Intel first knew about the problem they decided not to tell anyone, thinking that the flaw would hardly affect anyone and that it was just a commonplace for a complex microprocessor to have a few bugs. Then, when it was forced to acknowledge the problem, Intel pushed it away again and dismissed the chances of it causing problems for the average user. In my opinion, Intel was acting very unprofessional when they knew about the problems and did nothing to fix the problem. I think that Intel was just trying to save......

Words: 604 - Pages: 3

Pentium Flaw

...Tiffany M Shamlee Unit 5 Analysis 1 NT1110 Pentium Flaw The Pentium flaw was discovered where the division result returned by the Pentium microprocessor was off by about sixty-one parts per million. When Intel discovered the flaw, their solution was to keep the information within the company. They did not want to disclose any of the information to the public, because of the negative publicity it would bring to the company. The flaw did not affect all microprocessors, only a very small number of customers. I feel that Intel should have openly acknowledged the problem despite the small number of customers affected. Intel determined if customers were affected by the flaw when they called in to report a problem. They did this by inputting a certain code into their system. Once they identified the problem, Intel would then implement a solution. However, if feel if Intel had openly accepted and informed the clients about the issue, it would have most likely saved them money. Their reputation between the company and their existing clients would have also been protected. Intel’s decision and way of handling the flaw caused a lot of their customers to be very unhappy. If this type of flaw was to be found in a new CPU today, the company would surely fail. With a problem in the floating-point math subsection with an error of approximately sixty-one parts per million, this would cause too many problems for the clients today. Especially considering that Intel......

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Pentium Flaw There was a Pentium microprocessor flaw known as the FDIV bug. The bug is a flaw in the Intel P5 Pentium floating point unit. The bug causes the processor to return incorrect results for many calculations in math and science. Intel claims that it was a problem on a few missing entries in the lookup table used by the company. The flaw was rarely encountered by users. It was discovered by Professor Thomas Nicely, a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg College. He noticed the bug when he had written a code and noticed some inconsistencies in calculations once he added the Pentium system to his computers. He discovered this issue in June of 1994 but was unable to eliminate other factors until October of 1994. He reported the problem to Intel and they admitted that they were aware of the bug since May of 1994. Intel acknowledged the flaw, but claimed that it was not serious and would not affect most users. They offered to replace the processors to customers who could prove that they were affected by the flaw. This response did not make the public happy. They later decided to offer to replace all flawed Pentium processors on request of the customer. It turned out that only a fraction of the Pentium processor owners bothered to get their chips replaced. I believe that Intel did handle this problem in a professional manner and gave the people reasonable options to get their chips replaced. I think that the chip did not affect most people and had little or...

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Pentium Flaw

...Cunningham Pentium Flaw essay Intel’s greatest mistake was the so-called “Pentium flaw,”. Company engineers discovered the problem after the product’s release in 1993 but decided to keep quiet and fix the problem in updates to the chip. Mathematician Thomas Nicely of Lynchburg College in West Virginia also discovered the flaw. He didn’t want to recall the product. But when IBM announced it would not ship computers with the CPU, it forced a recall that cost Intel $475 million. This is how Intel fixed the problem. By the end of the century, Intel and compatible chips from companies like AMD were found in every PC except Apple Inc.’s Macintosh, which had used CPUs from Motorola since 1984. Craig Barrett, who succeeded Grove as Intel CEO in 1998, was able to close that gap. By the mid-1990s Intel had expanded beyond the chip business. In 2005 Apple CEO Steven Jobs shocked the industry when he announced future Apple PCs would use Intel CPUs. With the exception of some high-performance computers, called servers, and mainframes, Intel and Intel-compatible microprocessors can be found in virtually every PC. In the early 21st century the Taiwan-based manufacturer ASUSTeK had surpassed Intel as the leading maker of PC motherboards. Paul Otellini succeeded Barrett as Intel’s CEO in 2005. Jane Shaw replaced Barrett as chairman in 2009, when the company was ranked 61st on the Fortune 500 list of the largest American companies. I think we wouldn’t find the same flaw today because......

Words: 262 - Pages: 2