Fiedler's Model

In: Business and Management

Submitted By blaine
Words 267
Pages 2
Fred Fiedler developed the first comprehensive contingency model for leadership
Fiedler?s contingency model proposes that effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader?s style and the degree to which the situation gives control to the leader. The model consists of three steps. The first step is identifying the leadership style. To find out the leadership style Fiedler created the least preferred co-worker questionnaire. The questionnaire measures whether a person is task oriented or relationship oriented. The test requires the test taker to think about all the co-workers they have ever had and to describe the one person they least enjoyed working with by rating him/her on a scale of 1 to 8 of 16 sets of contrasting adjectives. If the least preferred co-worker is describe in positive terms then the respondent is a relationship oriented leader. And if the least preferred co-worker is describe in negative terms then the respondent is a task oriented leader. The second step is defining the situation. Fiedler stated three contingency dimensions that define situational factors that in turn determine leadership effectiveness. These three contingency dimensions are leader-member relations, task structure and position power. The last is matching leaders and situations. Fiedler says that task oriented leaders perform best in situations of high and low control. And relationship oriented leaders perform best moderate control situations. Fiedler and an associate also came up with the cognitive resource theory. The theory states that stress unfavorably affects a situation and that intelligence and experience can lessen the influence of stress on the…...

Similar Documents

Model

...The Howard Sheth model, serves as an integrating framework for a very sophisticated comprehensive theory of consumer behavior. It should be noted that the authors actually use the term buyer in their model to refer to industrial purchases as well as ultimate consumers. Thus, it can be seen that their interest was to develop a unified theory useful for understanding a great variety of behaviors. The model attempts to depict rational brand choice behavior by buyers under conditions of incomplete information and limited abilities. It distinguishes three levels of decision making: 1) Extensive problem solving – early stages of decision making in which the buyer has little information about brands and has not yet developed, well defined and structured criteria by which to choose among products (choice criteria). 2) Limited problem solving – in this more advanced stage choice criteria are well defined but the buyer is still undecided about which set of brands will best serve him. Thus, the consumer still experiences uncertainty about which brand is best. 3) Routinized responses behavior – buyers have well defined choice criteria and also have strong predispositions towards the brand. Little confusion exists in the consumer’s mind and he is ready to purchase a particular brand with little evaluation of alternatives The model borrows from learning concepts to explain brand choice behavior over time as learning takes place and the buyer moves from exclusive to routinized problem......

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Fiedler Model

...The Fiedler Model Fiedler’s Contingency Theory shows the relationship between the leader’s orientation or style and group performance under differing situational conditions. The theory is based on determining the orientation of the leader (relationship or task), the elements of the situation (leader-member relations, task structure, and leader position power), and the leader orientation that was found to be most effective as the situation changed from low to moderate to high control. Fiedler found that task oriented leaders were more effective in low and moderate control situations and relationship oriented managers were more effective in moderate control situations LPC and Situational Factors Fiedler identified the a Least Preferred Co-Worker scoring for leaders by asking them first to think of a person with which they worked that they would like least to work with again, and then to score the person on a range of scales between positive factors (friendly, helpful, cheerful, etc.) and negative factors (unfriendly, unhelpful, gloomy, etc.). A high LPC leader generally scores the other person as positive and a low LPC leader scores them as negative. High LPC leaders tend to have close and positive relationships and act in a supportive way, even prioritizing the relationship before the task. Low LPC leaders put the task first and will turn to relationships only when they are satisfied with how the work is going. Three factors are then identified about the leader,......

Words: 2220 - Pages: 9

Model

...MODEL DE PLÂNGERE Către, AUTORITATEA NAŢIONALĂ DE SUPRAVEGHERE A PRELUCRĂRII DATELOR CU CARACTER PERSONAL Str. Olari, nr. 32, sector 2, Bucureşti Subsemnatul/a (numele şi prenumele) ........................................................................cu domiciliul/reşedinţa în.................................. str. ......................... nr. ..... bl. ..... sc. .... ap. ....., judeţul/ sectorul....................... CNP........................... telefon ........................., adresa de e-mail (opţional),................................., în temeiul art. 25 din Legea nr. 677/2001 pentru protecţia persoanelor cu privire la prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal şi libera circulaţie a acestor date, vă aduc la cunoştinţă următoarele: (numele/denumirea operatorului),............................................... cu domiciliul/sediul în......................................a prelucrat ilegal datele mele personale (se enumeră datele respective),................................... în următoarele împrejurări:.................................... (se descrie situaţia considerată de petent ca fiind o încălcare a Legii nr. 677/2001). Declar pe proprie răspundere că obiectul prezentei plângeri nu face obiectul unei acţiuni în justiţie. Precizez că m-am adresat în prealabil operatorului cu scrisoarea din data de ........................ *, însă nu am primit un răspuns/răspunsul primit nu îl consider satisfăcător din următoarele motive:......................(se alege...

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Leadership Model, Model

...Leadership Models Leadership styles cannot be fully explained by behavioural models. The situation in which the group is operating also determines the style of leadership which is adopted. Several models exist which attempt to understand the relationship between style and situation, four of which are described here: • Fiedler's Contingency Model. • Hersey-Blanchard Situational Theory. • Path-Goal Theory. • Vroom-Yetton Leadership Model The models described have limited validity, but are still widely used. [pic] Fiedler's Contingency model Fiedler's model assumes that group performance depends on: • Leadership style, described in terms of task motivation and relationship motivation. To determine one’s basic style, Fiedler created the least preferred co-worker (LPC) questionnaire-containing 16 contrasting adjectives. • Situational favourableness, determined by three factors: 1. Leader-member relations - Degree to which a leader is accepted and supported by the group members. 2. Task structure - Extent to which the task is structured and defined, with clear goals and procedures. 3. Position power - The ability of a leader to control subordinates through reward and punishment. High levels of these three factors give the most favourable situation, low levels, the least favourable. Relationship-motivated leaders are most effective in moderately favourable situations. Task-motivated leaders are most effective at either end of...

Words: 939 - Pages: 4

A Model

...A model is a simplified representation of some aspect of the world. In what ways may models help or hinder the research for knowledge? A model by definition is “a schematic description of a system, theory, or phenomenon that accounts for its known or inferred properties and may be used for further study of its characteristics”[1] that implies that a model is supposed to be a helping hand while searching for knowledge in any subject. Sometimes however models can appear to be quite confusing as they are to general or too far away from real life situations. So how and in what way models can help and hinder the search for knowledge in natural sciences, human sciences and arts I am going to argue in the following essay. In school we learn all our subjects with the help of models and especially in natural sciences we need them in order to assume what might happen if, say in biology, in a cell there is a lack of oxygen and we know and can explain with a model of a cell and of the respiratory cycle how anaerobic respiration works and what it does and needs. With the help of the model and through logical connecting of facts that the student might already have, he can develop the thought in his or her mind and therefore gain new knowledge about a theoretical process that was proven to take place in the human body. Another model, which however is not as accurate also in Biology is the Sigmoid Population growth curve. It displays the population growth of a species over a period of......

Words: 1415 - Pages: 6

Models!

...The specification says ‘explanations’, which means you’ll need to know at least two explanations. 1. The importation model – this explains aggression in prisons. In brief, it says aggression occurs because of characteristics that prisoners bring inside with them. Cheeseman (2003) said that men in prison have a certain way of behaving (probably why they went to prison in the first place!) and they then apply that behaviour to their new institutional setting. Toch (1997) says this: all prisons inherit their subcultural sediments from the street corners that supply them with clients. This suggests that young people can be aggressive both on the street and in prison. Personal and psychological factors that existed in inmates before being incarcerated can affect the level of aggressive behaviour shown in prison. Mills, Kroner and Weekes (1998) studied prisoners admitted to a Canadian prison using the alcohol dependence scale (ADS). Inmates who had higher levels of dependence were associated with more aggression shown in prison. Also, inmates who had greater periods of unemployment, lower levels of education, and a more serious criminal record were more likely to be aggressive in prison (Kane and Janus, 1981). Demographic variables that seem to influence aggression in prisons are race and age. Studies in America have shown that non-whites and younger prisoners are more likely to be aggressive whilst incarcerated. Kane and Janus (1981) say that this is because these......

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Model

...IJFPSS, Vol.1, No.2, pp. 35-38, Dec, 2011 H. Darestani Quality excellence model: A review of researches in Developing countries Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail1, Hassan Darestani2*, Maziar Azimzadeh Irani3 1 2 International Business School (IBS), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia, 3 International Business School (IBS), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia dhassan2@live.utm.my (Received Nov 2011; Published Dec 2011) ABSTRACT There have been fundamental changes in management since 1950, and these changes are still affecting enterprises around the glob. Quality as the main issue of these changes has received special consideration. The European foundation for quality management (EFQM) was established in 1988 in order to achieve quality leadership and continuous improvement. EFQM is a model which is designed for all kinds of organization and with utilizing self assessment as a strategic tool helps companies to identify their weaknesses, strengths and areas of improvement. This paper reviews some of the studies conducted in developing countries about applying EFQM in enterprises with special attention to small and medium-sized enterprise (SMEs). The main purpose of this study is to find whether EFQM model have been successful in building winning and efficient organizations in developing countries. Due to the situation of global market and competitive...

Words: 2420 - Pages: 10

Model

...it is considered plagiarism. This is true whether direct passages are used or if you are just paraphrasing. Claiming credit for words or thoughts that are not your own is one type of academic misconduct. This includes having any name appear on a team project when that individual did not fully participate in completion of the project/paper. The final paper should be submitted by the end of the semester (last lesson) to Heder Avodot Readings Book: Daniel Levi, (2001). Group Dynamics for Teams. Sage publications. There are some copies in the library. 1. Team Effectiveness Levi chapters 1,2 Burke, S.C., Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1189-1207. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45,120-133. DeRue, D.S., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M.d., Ilgen, D.R., & Jundt, D.K. (2008). How different downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation and performance. Academy of management Journal, 51,182-196. Cannella, A.A., Park, J., & Lee, h. (2008). Top Management Team functional diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colcation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 768-784. Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 162-171 ......

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7

The Fiedler Model of Leadership

...The Fiedler Model of Leadership Fred Edward Fiedler (born July 13, 1922) is one of the leading researchers in industrial and organizational psychology of the 20th century. He was business and management psychologist at the University of Washington.He helped this field move from the research on traits and personal characteristics of leaders, to leadership styles and behaviours. In 1967 he introduced the contingency modeling of leadership, with the now-famous Fiedler Contingency Model. Identifying leadership style: Fiedler believes that a key factor in leadership success is the individual basic leadership style.He created the least preferred co-worker (LPC) questionnaire to identify that style by measuring whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The LPC scale asks a leader to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well, using a series of bipolar scales of 1 to 8, such as the following: Inefficient | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Efficient | Uncooperative | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Cooperative | Hostile | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Supportive | Unpleasant | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Pleasant | Guarded | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Open | | | | ….. | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | ….. | Unfriendly | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Friendly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A high LPC score suggests that......

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Models

...1.Rational goal models it can bring all the workers together which make the manager easier to control and rule them. Therefore, there is a more powerful right and firms can run the business easier. For example, employer can directly control the time limit or even the division of labour. Also, this can increase the output for the company. However, there is also a risk of business failure in it . Internal process models managers can creat bureaucratic structures which make workers can understand the clear rules to it. Also, they were using scientific management techniques to control production and impose discipline on factory work. The importance of a career structure is linked to a person’s position.The right to give instructions was based on a person’s position in the hierarchy, and a rational analysis of how staff should work. This worked well in large public and private organisations, such as government departments and banks. Human relations models This replaced bureaucratic institutions by networks in which people themselves analysed their problems and implemented their solutions. managers tell people to behave as if they are extensions of a machine, they will do so.managers would not manipulate their subordinates, but train them to use power responsibly. managers should give workers a chance to grow capacity or power for themselves. Open systems models The open systems approach draws attention to the links between the internal parts of a system, and to the links...

Words: 287 - Pages: 2

The Model

...The Document Object Model (DOM) is an important part of creating animation and making web pages interactive. The Document Object Model is used with Dynamic HTML to help accomplish the interactive web pages that are used today. “Dynamic HTML(DHTML) refers to a combination of technologies that make Web pages dynamic…a combination of JavaScript, XHTML, CSS, and the Document Object Model” (Gosselin, 2008, pg. 485).     The Document object Model is all the HTML that is displayed on a web page from the web browser. Each of the many elements contained in the web page are considered objects and can be controlled and changed by using JavaScript. The Document Object Model gives you the ability to change these elements without the web page needed to be reloaded. The HTML DOM can be used to dynamically change the document object and to change and control elements like images, which can themselves be considered the image object. The Document object and the image object both contain methods and properties that can be used to dynamically change the web page.     The methods used with the document object are close, open, getElementById, getElementsByName, getElementsByTagName, write and writeIn. The open method creates a new window or a frame. The close method closes the document that was opened with the open method. The getElementById method retrieves an element by the specified ID. The getElementsByName method retrieves an array of elements that have a specific name. The......

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Model

...Abiola Idowu Ashford University BUS640 Operations Management September 26, 2011 Introduction: Porter’s model is based on the insight that a corporate strategy should meet the opportunities and threats in the organizations external environment, especially competitive strategy should be based on the understanding of an industry’s structure and the way they change. Porter has identified five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. These forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. The objective of corporate strategy should be to modify these competitive forces in a way that improves the position of the organization. Porter’s model supports the analysis of the driving forces in an industry. Based on the information derived from the five forces analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of their industry. The five competitive forces are typically described as follows: bargaining power of suppliers, the term 'suppliers' comprises of all sources for inputs that are needed in order to provide goods or services, supplier bargaining power is likely to be high when the market is dominated by a few large suppliers rather than a fragmented source of supply, there are no substitutes for the particular input, the suppliers, customers are fragmented so their bargaining power is low, the switching costs from one supplier to another are high there is......

Words: 3691 - Pages: 15

Fiedler’s Revolution

...Fiedler’s Revolution Ryan Kemrite Liberty University Abstract This research paper deals with Fiedler’s model of contingency in leadership, specifically looking at his model and some criticism of the model. While there are indeed criticism for the model and its application, Fiedler undoubtable has a spot in the history of business for his revolutionary concepts in management styles. This research paper examines countless reviews, positive and negative, and asserts that Fiedler has without a doubt earned a special place for his work. This paper shows how Fiedler’s work affected generations of business and leaves a foundation for others in the business research field to follow. Keywords Fielder, Contingency model, Leadership, Management, Revolutionary.   Fiedler Business throughout the ages has always changed and evolved and will continue to do so. Business is a fickle mistress as it reacts to the changing markets in the world and locally. These rapid changing markets make it difficult for any said business, firm or company to try and make profit. The goal of the firm should always be to maximize profit for the shareholders and owners of the company. When the goal of maximizing profits is realized it is a celebration. But worldwide businesses fail in big numbers. In just the United States alone, a large percent fail and drop out every year. About half of all new establishments survive five years or more and about one-third survive 10......

Words: 2261 - Pages: 10

Fiedler Contigency Model

...Fiedler contingency model The Fiedler contingency model is a leadership theory of industrial and organizational psychology developed by Fred Fiedler (born 1922), one of the leading scientists who helped his field move from the research of traits and personal characteristics of leaders to leadership styles and behaviours. 1 Two factors 1.1 Least preferred co-worker (LPC) 1.2 Situational favourableness 2 Leader-situation match and mismatch 2.1 Examples 3 Opposing views 4 Summary Two factors The first management style, Taylorists, assumed there was one best style of leadership. Fiedler’s contingency model postulates that the leader’s effectiveness is based on ‘situational contingency’ which is a result of interaction of two factors: leadership style and situational favorableness (later called situational control). More than 400 studies have since investigated this relationship. Least preferred co-worker (LPC) The leadership style of the leader, thus, fixed and measured by what he calls the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale, an instrument for measuring an individual’s leadership orientation. The LPC scale asks a leader to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well, using a series of bipolar scales of 1 to 8, such as the following: Unfriendly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Friendly Uncooperative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cooperative Hostile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Supportive .... 1 2 3 4 5...

Words: 5890 - Pages: 24

Four Models

...Four Models of Leadership Lisa S. Patrick University of Phoenix Four Leadership Models There are theories that suggest characteristics, behaviors and relationships that inspire and create effective leaders and followers within organizations. The Trait Leadership Model, Behavior Leadership Model, Situational Leadership Model, and Charismatic Leadership Model provide assumptions built on theories from approaches that incorporate characteristics, leader behaviors, outcomes affected by situations and how leader relationships inspire change in an organization. Differences and similarities exist among these approaches and may address some of the contemporary leadership and challenges in organizations. Trait Leadership Model The Trait Model examined specific traits researchers believed were associated with leadership and focused on the innate characteristics that make good leaders. This body of research included theories that “leaders were born and not made” (Clawson, 2006, p. 379) in the “Great Man” Theory of Leadership. Kouzes (2003) believes that to view a few men and woman as innate greatness is wrong and that heroes do exists in organizations. Other Theorists like Stogdill’s Leadership Traits, Maccobys Leader, and John Gardner’s Leaders noted characteristics believed to make great leaders. Stogdill believed leaders were strong, task-oriented, confident, handled stress, and accepted responsibility for actions were qualities of a good leader (Clawson, 2006;......

Words: 1738 - Pages: 7