Evaluating a Historical Argument

In: Historical Events

Submitted By Skarlit
Words 565
Pages 3
Evaluating a Historical Argument

1. The main purpose of this article is the debate over whether the United States should annex the Philippines to the US territories or not. 2. The key question that the author is addressing is: why did the US decide to establish an overseas empire?
3. The most important evidence in this article is: a) “The [decision] for annexing the Philippines empire provides a powerful case study—for some, a cautionary tale—regarding the unintended consequences of intervening in foreign lands” (Hollitz Thinking through The Past, ch.4, pg. 79, paragraph 3). In that case, the consequence happened to be a bloody military bath on both sides. b) “…some scholars argue that democratic or popular influences play an important role in shaping policy” (Hollitz Thinking through The Past, ch.4, pg. 79, paragraph 4). Popular influences did play an important role in deciding on whether annexing Philippines were a wise decision or not. However, it didn’t necessarily mean the government had to listen to it. c) “…by the 1960s, the Vietnam War had created doubts among many Americans about popular influence on government policy and the motives of elite policy makers” (Hollitz Thinking through The Past, ch.4, pg. 80, paragraph 8). Here, they realized that just because something is popular doesn’t mean it is good for the public as a whole. d) “…American leaders realized the economic benefits of overseas expansion and led the nation to war with Spain to build a commercial empire” (Hollitz Thinking through The Past, ch.4, pg. 80, paragraph 8). The government knew what’s best for its people, and they went along with it because they needed to make themselves known and become a global power. e) “…the acquisition of the Philippines was essential to realizing profits in China—potentially a huge market in the Far East” (Hollitz Thinking through The…...

Similar Documents

Argument

...Generally according to Spatt (2011) ,There are four mistakes avoiding to presenting arguments: 1. Don’t be one-sided; present both sides of an argument, (Spatt, 2011) 2. Don’t omit crucial parts of the source’s reasoning; provide a complete, Account of the argument. (Spatt, 2011) 3. Don’t quote ideas out of context: make sure that you—and your Reader—understand whether the source really supports the idea That you are citing. (Spatt, 2011) 4. Don’t twist the source’s ideas to fit your own purpose; provide a fair Presentation. (Spatt, 2011) I believe presenting one-sided argument means you indicate the winner side of argument and then start arguing. It means you lead your audiences to way that you believe is right way. We see this mistake in many countries election while their candidate debates. Avoiding one-sided is very important cause one-sided arguing makes arguing to conflict. One-sidedness fallacy doesn't mean that your premises are false or irrelevant, only that they are incomplete. You may have appealed only to relevant considerations, but you haven't yet appealed to all relevant. When you omit the crucial part of source reasoning .For example simply you arguing about the light of the light bulb but you omit the electricity. Sometimes before conclusion an accredit author write the variety of opinions which is not agree with, but we as a person choose these phrases as our evidence to prove our opinions. You may be so eager to uphold your point of view......

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

Argument

...NAME: KYERE SYLVIA AFRAH STUDENT NUMBER: 10421987 ASSIGNMENT NUMBER: ONE QUESTION : IN ONE - TWO PAGES DESCRIBE AN ARGUMENT YOU HAVE RECENTLY WITNESSED,WHAT WAS THE SOURCE OF DISAGREEMENT,WHAT VIEW POINTS WERE ARGUED ,WHO IN YOUR OPINION MADE THE MOST PERSUASIVE POINTS AND WHY,WHO WON THE ARGUMENT. There have always been arguments amongst people as to which of these two occupation is more important ie teaching and farming .People have always been arguing about these two occupations on radios, in schools, in the newspapers etc .In my opinion, they are both equally important. Recently, I witnessed an argument between two gentlemen in a vehicle on my way home . These two gentlemen were by the names Mr. Fred Jones and Mr. Eric Blessing. They were both government workers who had closed from work and were going home. From the look of things they seemed to be friends. These gentlemen were conversing when the driver turned the radio on. Mr. Jones and Mr. Blessing stopped the conversation when they heard on the radio that the farmers in Ghana were planning to go on demonstration as well as teachers. These news heard by both men brought about the argument which went on for almost an hour. Mr. Jones agreed with the farmers who were planning to go on demonstration but did not agree with teachers planning to go on ......

Words: 708 - Pages: 3

Argument

...Guy looking for Sports Jacket: yeah I already asked all these guys down the hall So this wasn’t the most interesting conversation. I definitely didn’t expect to be a part of it either. But now that I have that part complete I want to talk about this entire conversation and about this guy’s argument on trying to borrow someone’s suit coat. First off I find it hard to even call this an argument. Since I’m a firm believer in using logic to sway arguments in my favor, I have to say his particular argument fell way short. In other words, he used no logic. His apparent and really only tactic was sympathy, he only tried pleading. Not usually effective in my opinion when you’re trying to borrow something… you just come off as desperate. When he talked to me, I used logic to explain why he could not borrow my jacket. I wasn’t totally opposed to letting him borrow my jacket at all. In fact, if he had come up with a good enough argument I’m sure I would let him borrow my suit coat. It would’ve matched his paints anyways. Also the sewn parts of my jacket are in a gold-ish yellow, the same as his shirt color; it would’ve worked out pretty well for him… if only he had tried better at forming an argument....

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Critically Evaluating an Argument

...Title | Investigating a Problem and Refining a Solution | Assessment Part A: Investigating and Rating Sources of Information | Is the website from Kathleen credible? | The website from Kathleen is credible. | The website from Kathleen is not credible. | | Is the website from Kathleen relevant? | The website from Kathleen is not relevant. | The website from Kathleen is somewhat relevant. | The website from Kathleen is highly relevant. | | Is the survey from Martine credible? | The survey from Martine is credible. | The survey from Martine is not credible. | | Is the survey from Martine relevant? | The survey from Martine is not relevant. | The survey from Martine is somewhat relevant. | The survey from Martine is highly relevant. | | Is Naureen's story credible? | Naureen's story is credible. | Naureen's story is not credible. | | Is Naureen's story relevant? | Naureen's story is not relevant. | Naureen's story is somewhat relevant. | Naureen's story is highly relevant. | | Is the American Medicine article credible? | The American Medicine article is credible. | The American Medicine article is not credible. | | Is the American Medicine article relevant? | The American Medicine article is not relevant. | The American Medicine article is somewhat relevant. | The American Medicine article is highly relevant. | | Is the article from Deanne credible? | The......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Reconstruction of Arguments

...RECONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS Deductive and Inductive Here we are to learn the techniques for PART I, Making a Critique- i.e., argument reconstruction, by doing the following “steps”: 1. Read the discourse; 2. Number and Bracket arguments; 3. Write an Index of Claims; and 4. Tree-Diagram the arguments. What is critiquing? Benjamin Samuel Bloom (1913 – 1999) - the creator of Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) following a framework for categorizing educational goals: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; revised in 2001 by Anderson & Ktrathwohl) with collaborators Max Englehart, Edward Furst, Walter Hill, and David Krathwohl as A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. This taxonomy consists of six major categories: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation.  The categories after knowledge (containing subcategories) were presented as "skills and abilities," (manifested by a person’s intellectual abilities as well) with the understanding that knowledge was the necessary precondition for putting these skills and abilities into practice. As revised in 2001, these cognitive skills were rather treated more dynamically by using verbs and gerunds to label their categories and subcategories (rather than the nouns of the original taxonomy as knowledge objectives).  These "action words" describe the cognitive processes by which thinkers encounter and work with knowledge. They are (from the lowest thinking skill): Categories &...

Words: 18502 - Pages: 75

Evaluating an Argument

...Constitution’s Fourth Amendment restrictions on unreasonable searches (Washington Post, 2013). The judge also rejected the applicability of the 1979 ruling that offered no constitutional protection to metadata, with the argument that Americans’ “relationship with technology has changed drastically now that cellphones and tablet computers are so ubiquitous and powerful and that the government ability to collect information in bulk and hold it in perpetuity changes the context decisively from the 1979 case.” The concluding part of the article argues that the NSA’s activities will continue to litigate in court and in the court of public opinion. If the government is to emerge from Mr. Snowden’s revelations with the authorities that officials insist are crucial, it have to do more to demonstrate why they are essential and how Americans’ privacy is being protected. The style of argument used in this article is an inductive argument, in the sense that the author is attesting that the truth of the conclusion necessarily follows the premises of the argument. According to Jackson and Newberry (2010), an inductive argument is one in which the argue attempts to demonstrate that the truth of the conclusion probably follows from the premises (pg. 119). The first premise of the argument is that bulk collection of phone and call records by are potentially powerful tool. The second premise is if these records are abuse could reveal sensitive facts about nearly every American’s life. ......

Words: 900 - Pages: 4

Argument

...1. When I began reading the chapter, I thought of argument as conflict between two or more party over a problem. However, once I had finished the chapter I believe that argument mean to solve a problem with no string attach. 2. One example of issues are everywhere, is at the store and you are deciding rather to buy banana or apple. Another example is Election Day, rather to vote for one candidate over the other. For an visual argument example: Unknown. “Just Do It.” Photo. Abailey40.wordpress.com 13 Feb. 2012. 20 Dec 2013 <http://www.abailey40.wordpress.com> This is a visual argument because it a Nike sign said “Just Do It”, however the young boy is just peeing on it. 3. A traditional argument example is the public debate among candidates for public office or among other individuals view. Another example of tradition argument is Courtroom argument, with lawyers pleading before judge and jury. Consensual argument can happen in college class as your professor try to guide you to the final idea. Another consensual argument can happen in political science, because in politic science, you will need to take part in academic inquiry to come to a conclusion. 4. For an argument to work best, you will need claim and support. 5. For an argument to fail, it might just be not enough true support, false facts, and cannot claim anything. 6. An example of ethical argument is a plan for effective and economical way to rebuild areas that are destroyed. Another......

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Argument

...Hannah Hatfield Mr. Newell English 101-066 12 November 2009 What Language Am I Speaking Now? After becoming a Christian every person is granted a spiritual gift through the Holy Spirit. It is in these gifts one’s talents and abilities inside and out of the church are magnified tenfold to be used for the glory of God. Although some would deny the actuality of the spiritual gifts all together most would agree the existence of such gifts as wisdom, teaching, leading or compassion. However it is with the more controversial gifts that most evangelical Christians have suspicions towards, such as prophecy, the discerning of spirits and the working of miracles. However it is the gift of tongues which is the cause for most arguments concerning the spiritual gifts. In more conservative churches, the gift of tongues is not practiced, however in Pentecostal, as well as other charismatic churches the gift of tongues is considered accomplished. By discrediting those who speak in tongues, establishing the language itself and by citing Paul in his letter to the Corinthian church shows the gift of tongues or formally known as glossolalia, is no longer existent in today’s world but rather an outlet for emotion. Being able to disprove the gift of tongues through a psychological stand point by finding information correlating to glossolalia may be difficult however it is Daniel S. Smith and J. Roland Fleck in “Personality Correlates of Conventional and Unconventional Glossolalia” who......

Words: 1276 - Pages: 6

Evaluating Historical Views to Leadership

... Evaluating Historical Views to Leadership Jaimi Schaffer, M.Ed LDR/711A Leadership Theories and Practice University of Phoenix April Flanagan, Ph.D February 23, 2015 Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were largely influenced by the times in which they lived. Bass (1974) penned, “from its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders” Wren, 1995 p. 50). This evaluation of historical views of leadership involved a review of the theories of W. E. B. Du Bois, Lao-tzu, and Niccolo Machiavelli, which yielded evidence of conflicting viewpoints on the topic of leadership throughout the ages. Each of these men’s theories and styles were very different, yet effective in their communities and beyond. They presented various traits of effective leadership ability and set examples for leaders to draw influence from as they formulate their own theories in more modern times. Commonalities and Disparities W. E. B. Du Bois believed that a certain segment of intelligent and educated black men were meant to lead their race. Lao-tzu thought that the most effective leaders were those who had the ability to lead when their followers barely knew they existed in a leadership capacity. Finally, Machiavelli believed that leaders or rulers should operate by force (Wren, 1995). After completing the assigned readings about......

Words: 1230 - Pages: 5

An Argument for Euthanasia

...euthanasia with the assisted suicide of Janet Adkins. He would continue to assist in patients suicides until his arrest in 1999 (ProCon.org.) In 1994 Oregon became the first state to legalize euthanasia with their “Death With Dignity Act” The law had substantial backing and would later become the framework for giving individuals the right to end their own suffrage. Using Oregon as an example, several other states have legalized euthanasia. Washington and Montana both legalized the act late in 2008 with Vermont following suit in 2013 (ProCon.org.) An important issue is whether euthanasia should be legalized nationally. Major arguments are the following; is euthanasia constitutional? Is euthanasia ethical? Can it be the means of discrimination and abuse? After careful examination, it will be proven that euthanasia should be legalized nationally. The most important argument is whether the national legalization of euthanasia is constitutional. Constitutional is defined as “being in accordance with or authorized by the constitution of a state or society” (Constitutional) The fourteenth amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, which included former slaves recently freed. In addition, it forbids states from denying any person life, liberty or property, without due process of law or to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. By directly mentioning......

Words: 3117 - Pages: 13

Argument

...Argument Essay Unit: Lesson Plan and Class Activities Global Learning Outcomes for this Unit *In the course of completing the assignment students will: • Learn to compose an argumentation-oriented thesis • Defend their thesis with academic-quality research that is properly sourced and cited as per the standard of university level writing • Anticipate and respond to counterarguments • Learn to critically engage the revision process through draft writing, instructor conferencing, and peer commentary • Respond the work of their peers as peer reviewers while providing relevant, productive feedback Class 1 – Introducing the Classical Argument Essay *Daily Learning Outcomes: • Reflect on Informative Essay • Introduce Classical Argument Essay • Break down the assignment sheet *Activity 1: Individual Reflection / Class Discussion (15 min) - Students open their portfolios and journals then reflect for ~10 minutes on their experiences during the Informative Essay Unit - Discuss reflections as a class *Activity 2: Introduce Classical Argument (20 min) - Have students bring a hard copy of the assignment to class with a highlighter: a. Get into groups of 4 b. Read the sheet aloud, highlighting all the action verbs c. Discuss the sheet as a group as instructor makes rounds *Activity 3: Mini-Lecture on Assignment /Questions (15 min) - Powerpoint slides “The Features of an Academic Argument” -......

Words: 4392 - Pages: 18

Argument

...Classic Model for an Argument No one structure fits all written arguments. However, most college courses require arguments that consist of the following elements. Below is a basic outline for an argumentative or persuasive essay. This is only one possible outline or organization. Always refer to your handbook for specifics. I. Introductory Paragraph o Your introductory paragraph sets the stage or the context for the position you are arguing for. o This introduction should end with a thesis statement that provides your claim (what you are arguing for) and the reasons for your position on an issue. A. Your thesis: o states what your position on an issue is o usually appears at the end of the introduction in a short essay o should be clearly stated and often contains emphatic language (should, ought, must) B. Sample Argumentative Thesis o The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the U.S. II. Body of your Argument A. Background Information o This section of your paper gives the reader the basic information he or she needs to understand your position. This could be part of the introduction, but may work as its own section. B. Reasons or Evidence to Support your Claim o All evidence you present in this section should support your position. This is the heart of your essay. Generally, you begin with a general statement that you back up with specific details or examples. Depending on how long your argument is, you will need to......

Words: 684 - Pages: 3

Argument

...City. Analyzing this argument brings up a lot of questions to whether this is a relevant argument or not. A lot of assumptions are made without enough facts to support them. It can be said that the mall could have directly or indirectly been a part of the problems. The problems are: Increase in crime and vagrancy, businesses closing, and a parking shortage. It is not logical to say that it is sole cause of the situation. This argument states that the building of the mall is the reason that some businesses have went out of business. To say that the mall and the closes of the businesses go hand in hand is not totally accurate. There are a number of reasons that could have led to the closing of the businesses. For one example, you could say that a change in the economy might have led to the closures. If this occurred after the holidays, it could say that people spent most of their money during this time and it could have hurt some businesses beyond the point of repair. Also, this argument doesn?t state what kinds of businesses had troubles. If it was something as in a grocery store, the mall could not be the cause because the mall doesn?t interfere directly with the food industry. Also, a majority of small businesses succumb to larger ones. This area is not exempt to the possibilities that this is what could have happened. This argument does not state if mergers of smaller companies related to the statement. The argument tries to tie......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Argument

...since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.” Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient.” This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the author’s rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws. First, the author’s forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods’ “long experience”......

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Argument

...Collaboration and Argument paper Gerald Washington ENG/215 4/09/2012 Gayle Thomas Collaboration and Argument paper In the library there are many ‘evidence and argument that collaboration pays dividends. Library impact research demonstrates that collaboration is essential in maximizing the positive impact of the library media programs on student achievement and school success. Unfortunately, both the organizational structure and the culture in most schools discourage collaborative efforts among faculty members. Research results indicate that students develop higher quality information literacy skills when instruction on those skills is integrated with subject matter itself is similarly enhanced. (Hartzell, 2007 p3). One area of school librarianship often neglected in discussion of library functions is how the librarian can assist in helping, “In collaboration there are many advantages and disadvantages. There are three advantages that you should focus on, collaboration offers a wide expertise and skills than just one writer may possess. The responsibility is wider spread, both allowing more members to shine with their accomplishments and removing the burden on just one person to produce a polished document.” Collaboration offers the opportunities. Knowing that two people are not exactly alike when it comes to writing habits, would help out immensely when it comes to writing a collaborative paper. Each person could interject their own styles into the paper, showcasing...

Words: 465 - Pages: 2