Alex Sharpe's Portfolio

In: Business and Management

Submitted By skfh82
Words 641
Pages 3
Executive Summary

Our team concludes that risk and return are strongly correlated. A higher risk usually yields a higher return. Our team observed that within Alex Sharpe’s portfolio, the Reynolds’ fund holds the highest risk (highest standard deviation of 32.45%), as well as the highest return (16.27% in comparison to Hasbro’s return of 11.31%). Although a lower standard deviation (lower risk) is ideal for an investment portfolio, the Reynolds’ fund yields a higher return for the higher associated risk. Furthermore, our team’s data illustrated that the mix of S&P with Reynolds has a higher return and lower standard deviation than the S&P alone. In addition, if Sharpe invests in Reynolds and Hasbro equally, at for instance, one percent, the average return for Reynolds is significantly higher (at 7.08%) than the average return for Hasbro (at 6.97%). Computing the Sharpe ratio for each of the portfolios, the one with 1% Reynolds is the highest at. Given this analysis, our team feels that Alex Sharpe should consider investing more in the Reynolds fund than in Hasbro fund.

Stock Analysis

1. Returns and Risk
Estimate and compare the returns and variability (i.e., annual standard deviation over the past five years) of Reynolds and Hasbro with that of the S&P 500 Index. Which stock appears to be riskiest?

| S&P500 | Reynolds | Hasbro | Arithmetic Return | 6.89% | 22.50% | 14.21% | Std Dev | 12.48% | 32.45% | 28.11% |

Reynolds has the highest risk (measured by Std Dev) and highest return. The standard deviation for Reynolds is 32.45% over 5 years. The arithmetic return is 22.5% over the same period.

2. Portfolio Risk
Suppose Sharpe’s position had been 99 percent of equity funds invested in the S&P 500 and either one per cent in Reynolds over one percent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock…...

Similar Documents

Alex

...Alex Pappas Ms. Singh English 104 28 March 2008 Wireless Communication Wireless communications are everywhere. People around the world regularly send and receive messages wirelessly, that is, transmitted through the air. Three types of wireless communications include wireless messaging services, wireless Internet access points, and global positioning systems. People use mobile phones, PDAs, and other mobile devices to access text messaging, instant messaging, and picture messaging services [ (Davies 34-42) ]. Through text messaging services, users send and receive short text messages, which usually consist of fewer than 300 characters. Wireless instant messaging is an Internet communications service that allows a wireless mobile device to exchange instant messages with one or more mobile devices or online personal computers. Users send graphics, pictures, video clips, sound files, and short text messages with picture messaging services. In many public locations, people connect to the Internet through a wireless Internet access point using mobile computers and devices. Two types of wireless Internet access points are hot spots and 3-G networks. A 3-G network, which uses cellular radio technology, enables users to connect to the Internet through a mobile phone or computer equipped with an appropriate PC Card. A hot spot is a wireless network that allows mobile users to check e-mail, browse the Web, and access any Internet service – as long as their computers or devices......

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio Solution

...Context: Alex Sharpe currently invests her children’s educational savings in Vanguard 500 Index Fund, which tracks the performance of S&P 500 and is passively managed. However, she is now considering switching her investment strategy to a more active one to achieve better outcomes. Hasbro, a toy manufacturer, and Reynolds, a tobacco firm, have come into Sharpe’s sight and she wants to choose one of them and invest a small proportion of equity funds in it. In order to select a more appropriate investment target, the following issues should be taken into consideration by Sharpe: 1) What are the risk-return characteristics of each stock 2) What are the impacts of either stock to the overall risk-return profiles of the equity portfolio Analysis: 1. Suppose Sharpe's position had been 99 percent of equity funds invested in the S&P500 and either one percent in Reynolds or one percent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? Which stock appears to be the riskiest? Let A (and B) be the portfolio with 99% of S&P 500 and 1% of Reynolds (and 1% Hasbro). | S&P 500 | Reynolds | Hasbro | Portfolio A | Portfolio B | Mean Return | 0.5743% | 1.8748% | 1.1838% | 0.5873% | 0.5804% | Std Dev | 3.6017% | 9.3665% | 8.1158% | 3.5933% | 3.6174% | According to our calculation, Portfolio A is a better choice with higher expected return (0.5873%) and lower standard deviation (3.5933%)...

Words: 1242 - Pages: 5

Case Alex Sharpe's Portfolio

...| Case 2: Alex Sharpe’s portfolio | 8.5.2014 | | Tools Tehtävä 1. CAPM kaava on: Osakkeen tuotto-odotus E(Ri) = 10,25 % Riskittömän sijoituskohteen tuotto Rf = 6 % Markkinaportfolion tuotto-odotus E(Rm) = 14,5 % (riskitön korko + riskipreemio) Sijoittamalla nämä yllä olevaan kaavaan saadaan: 10,25 % = 6 % + β(14,5 % - 6 %) josta saadan betan β arvoksi 0,5. Kun osakkeen tuottojen ja markkinaportfolion välinen kovarianssi kaksinkertaistuu, β-kerroin kaksinkertaistuu, kun markkinaportfolion varianssi ei muutu. Betan kaksinkertaistuessa osakkeen riskipreemio puolittuu. Kun β kerrotaan kahdella ja luvut sijoitetaan samaan kaavaan, saadaan osakkeen tuotto-odotukseksi E(ri) eli sijoittajien tuottovaatimukseksi 14,5 %. E(ri) = 6 % +2 *0,5 (14,5 % - 6 %) => E(ri)=14,5 %. Yrityksen maksaessa 50 € * 0,1025 = 5,125 € osinkoa, osakkeen arvoksi saadaan: CFvr= 5,1250,145= 35,34 € Tehtävä 2. a) Merkitään raaka-ainerahaston osuutta salkusta muuttujalla x. 12,5 % x + 9 % *(1-x) = 10 % josta saadaan x = 28,6 % b) Markkinaportfolion beta β on 1, joten salkun β on oltava 1. Merkitään raaka-ainerahaston osuutta salkusta muuttujalla x. 1,5x + 0,8*(1-x) = 1 josta saadaan x = 28,6 %, eli raaka-ainerahastoon tulee sijoittaa 28,6 %. c) Koska riskittömän sijoituksen volatiliteetti on 0, voidaan suoraan laskea salkun volatiliteetti painotetulla keskiarvolla. Merkitään nykyisen salkun osakkeita muuttujalla x. Seuraavien epäyhtälöiden täytyy olla......

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Alex

...THE TASK: Alex began to define our mission and my assignment: “Our company is considering establishing a greater presence here in Kava,” Alex started. “That greater presence could take various forms, based on what’s good for our company and what’s good for the people of Kava. You and I get the chance to analyze, synthesize, and prescribe regarding that decision.” “Because so many disasters happen here?” I questioned. “I think I can write up this recommendation in two words, ‘Forget It’.” Again with great patience, Alex explained, slowly and deliberately, “I guess you can just take your ball and go home. But our organization chose to play in this game and you chose to join our organization. If you really want to play, you will have to take your turn at bat. There are no designated hitters in this game.” I rephrased my thoughts, “OK, we want a greater presence on Kava, because so many disasters happen here.” Alex answered, “Yes, but even more. Certainly, one reason is that whatever happens here affects us there. I’ll make sure you understand that as we create this study. As you’ve seen recently, disasters happen at home, too. We can avoid, deny, or ignore them. We have to turn them into opportunities. Another huge reason is the founder of our company, Chris Morales, has a deep-seeded commitment to doing what is right. Not because of the economics, or politics, or recognition, but because it’s the right thing to do. Our organization is far from perfect, but we keep......

Words: 627 - Pages: 3

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio Solution

...Alex Sharpe’s Portfolio 1. Returns and Risk Estimate and compare the returns and variability (i.e. annual standard deviation over the past five years) of Reynolds and Hasbro with that of the S&P 500 Index. Which stock appears to be riskiest? S&P 500 Annualized Expected Return: 6.8920% S&P 500 SD (Annualized): 12.477% Reynolds Annualized Expected Return: 22.4980% Reynolds SD (Annualized): 32.446% Hasbro Annualized Expected Return: 14.2060% Hasbro SD (Annualized): 28.114% Reynolds appears to be the riskiest stock since it has the highest standard deviation. The fact that Reynolds also has the highest annualized expected return supports this calculation since risk and return should be directly correlated. 2. Portfolio Risk Suppose Sharpe’s position had been 99 percent of equity funds invested in the S&P 500 and either one per cent in Reynolds over one percent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? How does this relate to your answer in question 1 above? Portfolio Return of S&P 500 and Reynolds (annualized): 7.0481% Portfolio Return of S&P 500 and Hasbro (annualized): 6.9651% Standard Deviation of S&P 500: 12.477% Standard Deviation of S&P 500 and Reynolds: 12.3638% Standard Deviation of S&P 500 and Hasbro: 12.3699% Although Reynolds was a riskier stock overall than Hasbro (as determined in question 1), due to the fact that Reynolds is less correlated to......

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio

...FINA 5210: Investment Analysis (Prof. Abhiroop Mukherjee) Alex Sharpe’s Portfolio Discussion Guidelines 1. Download the raw data file from the LMES website under folder Cases Alex Sharpe’s Portfolio. Estimate and compare the average returns and variability of Reynolds and Hasbro. Which stock appears to be the riskiest by itself? Computing the average returns and standard deviations of Reynolds and Hasbro gives us the results shown in the table below. If the stocks are judged just by themselves, Reynolds has a higher standard deviation than Hasbro (9.37>8.12), hence it is more risky. Question: Can we also consider the sharpe-ratio? This would show some kind of risk adjusted-return! | REYNOLDS | HASBRO | Mean | 1.87% | 1.18% | Stdev | 9.37% | 8.12% | 2. Suppose Sharpe’s position had been 99% of equity funds invested in the Vanguard 500 Index and either 1% in Reynolds or 1% in Hasbro. Estimate the average return and volatility of the resulting portfolio. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? How does this compare to your answer in question 1? For both portfolio a and b, the average return increases compared to holding 100% of V500. The average return on portfolio a is higher than that of portfolio b (0.587>0.580). For portfolio a, the volatility of the portfolio decreases, whereas the volatility of Portfolio b increases. It is interesting to note that although Reynolds has a much higher standard deviation...

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Alex Sharper Portfolio

...ESTIME Y COMPARE LOS RENDIMIENTOS Y LA VARIABILIDAD (V.G. LA DESVIACIÓN ESTÁNDAR ANUALIZADA DE LOS RENDIMIENTOS MENSUALES DE LOS ÚLTIMOS 5 AÑOS) DE REYNOLDS Y DE HASBRO CON LOS DEL ÍNDICE S&P 500. ¿CUÁL DE LAS ACCIONES PARECE SER MÁS RIESGOSA? ACTIVO O PORTAFOLIO | R | σ | S&P 500 | 0.57% | 3.57% | REYNOLDS | 1.87% | 9.29% | HASBRO | 1.18% | 8.05% | La acción más riesgosa según los cálculos realizados es la de Reynolds, ya que sigma es más alta para esta acción. SUPONGA QUE LA POSICIÓN DE SHARPE HA SIDO 99 POR CIENTO DE LOS FONDOS INVERTIDOS EN EL S&P 500 Y YA SEA UNO POR CIENTO INVERTIDO EN REYNOLDS O UNO POR CIENTO INVERTIDO EN HASBRO. DETERMINE LA POSICIÓN DE PORTAFOLIO RESULTANTE. ¿CÓMO AFECTA CADA ACCIÓN LA VARIABILIDAD DE LA INVERSIÓN? ¿CÓMO SE RELACIONA ESTE RESULTADO CON SU RESPUESTA A LA PREGUNTA 1? PORTAFOLIO S&P 500 / REYNOLDS | S&P 500 | 0.99 | Reynolds | 0.01 |   |   | Rendimiento esperado portafolio | 0.00587338 | Covarianza S&P 500, Reynolds | 0.00093855 | σ2 Portafolio | 0.00126967 | σ Portafolio | 0.03563249 | Coeficiente de Variación portafolio | 6.06677340 | PORTAFOLIO S&P 500 / HASBRO | S&P 500 | 0.99 | Reynolds | 0.01 |   |   | Rendimiento esperado portafolio | 0.00580428 | Covarianza S&P 500, Reynolds | 0.00181111 | σ2 Portafolio | 0.00128674 | σ Portafolio | 0.03587110 | Coeficiente de Variación portafolio | 6.18010845 | Haga una regresión de los rendimientos......

Words: 312 - Pages: 2

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio

... With an ROCE of 18%, the current residual earnings on a dollar of book value is: RE0 = (0.18 – 0.10) ( 1.0 = 0.08 That is, 8 cents per dollar of book value. The value of an asset (with a constant growth rate is mind) is calculated as: [pic] (One always capitalizes the one-year-ahead amount, which is the current residual earnings, RE0, growing one year at 10%.) So, for every dollar of book value worth $2.50, [pic] Solving for g, g = 1.044 (a 4.4% growth rate) A good benchmark growth rate for the market as a whole is the GDP growth rate. This has historically been an average of about 4.0%. So, if history is an indication of the future, a 4.4 % implied growth rate suggests that the S&P 500 stocks, as a portfolio, are a little overpriced. What does a growth rate of 4.4% for residual earnings mean? If the S&P 500 firms can maintain an ROCE of 18%, then investment in net assets must grow by 4.4%. Alternatively, if ROCE were to improve, a growth in residual earnings of 4.4% can be maintained with a lower growth rate. Is a 4.4% growth rate for residual earnings reasonable? What is the prospect for ROCE for the market as a whole? Is the market appropriately priced? (Analysis in Part II of the book will help answer these questions.) (b) See the last paragraph. With a constant ROCE, the growth in residual earnings is determined by the growth in net assets (book value). Remember, residual earnings is driven by two factors: ...

Words: 24977 - Pages: 100

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio Solution

...within Alex Sharpe’s portfolio, the Reynolds’ fund holds the highest risk (highest standard deviation of 32.45%), as well as the highest return (16.27% in comparison to Hasbro’s return of 11.31%). Although a lower standard deviation (lower risk) is ideal for an investment portfolio, the Reynolds’ fund yields a higher return for the higher associated risk. Furthermore, our team’s data illustrated that the mix of S&P with Reynolds has a higher return and lower standard deviation than the S&P alone. In addition, if Sharpe invests in Reynolds and Hasbro equally, at for instance, one percent, the average return for Reynolds is significantly higher (at 7.08%) than the average return for Hasbro (at 6.97%). Computing the Sharpe ratio for each of the portfolios, the one with 1% Reynolds is the highest at. Given this analysis, our team feels that Alex Sharpe should consider investing more in the Reynolds fund than in Hasbro fund. Stock Analysis 1. Returns and Risk Estimate and compare the returns and variability (i.e., annual standard deviation over the past five years) of Reynolds and Hasbro with that of the S&P 500 Index. Which stock appears to be riskiest? | S&P500 | Reynolds | Hasbro | Arithmetic Return | 6.89% | 22.50% | 14.21% | Std Dev | 12.48% | 32.45% | 28.11% | Reynolds has the highest risk (measured by Std Dev) and highest return. The standard deviation for Reynolds is 32.45% over 5 years. The arithmetic return is 22.5% over the same period. 2. Portfolio......

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Portfolio

...w rP os t S 908N20 ALEX SHARPE'S PORTFOLIO op yo Professor Colette Southam wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The author does not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The author may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. Ivey Management Services prohibits any form of reproduction, storage or transmittal without its written permission. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Management Services, c/o Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7; phone (519) 661-3208; fax (519) 661-3882; e-mail cases@ivey.uwo.ca. Copyright © 2008, Ivey Management Services Version: (A) 2008-07-11 On Friday, January 26, 2007, Alex Sharpe sat in her home office and pondered her investment strategy. During her MBA program, Sharpe had learned that in an efficient market, investors should buy and hold the ‘market portfolio’ because no other portfolio can offer the same expected return at a lower risk. Since the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 was the most commonly used benchmark for the overall U.S. stock market, Sharpe had invested her children’s educational savings in the Vanguard 500 Index Fund, a no-load mutual fund......

Words: 1489 - Pages: 6

Alexs Wish

...di kamarnya berbunyi. Alex, begitu cewek kelas satu SMA itu biasa disapa, memang sengaja bangun pagi. Sebisa mungkin lebih pagi dibandingkan biasanya. Dia bangun pagi, mandi, dan menyiapkan keperluan sekolah secepatnya. Setelah itu, dia mengendap-endap menuju garasi. Ada motor 250 cc di sana, yang langsung di dorong Alex perlahan keluar garasi. “Alex, bangun!” terdengar teriakan Mama dari dalam rumah. Pasti Mama mengira dia belum bangun, karena belum juga muncul di ruang makan. Jam segini biasanya Mama sedang membuat sarapan dan Alex kadang membantunya. “Alex, kamu udah bangun, belum? Nanti terlambat,” kata Mama lagi. Alex nggak menyahut sama sekali. Dia malah semakin cepat mendorong motornya keluar gerbang. “Alex?!” teriak Mama yang tiba-tiba sudah berdiri di depan pintu. Wajah Mama tampak penuh amarah. Alex pura-pura nggak lihat, dia malah menyalakan mesin motornya. “Alex, jangan bawa motor itu! Berapa kali Mama bilang, nanti kamu bisa celaka! Alex! Alex....!” Alex nggak mendengar lagi ucapan mamanya. Ia menginjak pedal motor dan memutar gas di setang kanannya. Dengan cepat ia melaju meninggalkan rumahnya. Sudah lima bulan terakhir ini Alex berusaha berangkat sekolah naik motor sport berwarna dominan hijau ini. Aslinya motor itu punya Oom Fadly, adik Mama. Karena Oom Fadly ditugasin belajar di luar negeri oleh kantornya, motornya dititip di rumah Alex. Maksudnya sih biar bisa dipakai Adrian, kakak laki-laki Alex, buat kuliah. Tapi karena kakak Alex tinggal di kos-an dan......

Words: 37587 - Pages: 151

Portfolio Analysis

...Final Analysis Robert Patterson BUS655: Financial Investment Management Instructor: Scott Shaw Submitted September 14, 2015 Final Analysis When this portfolio was developed there was no experience and very little knowledge behind the investments. The investments were chosen based on quick internet research, information from investment TV shows, gut feeling, and the closest relatable past experiences. Hence the need to analyze the portfolio. The requirements for the portfolio were that it must include 100 shares of a publicly traded company, one corporate bond, one mutual fund, 100 call or put options that are at least 6 months out, and any leftover cash be put into a 6 month Certificate of Deposit (CD). The portfolio was $10,000 and 100% had to be invested. All relevant data on values, weightings, and so forth can be found in Table 1. All calculations are based on final values collected September 9, 2015. Even though the market did not perform well over this period and the portfolio was not constructed well, it seems to have performed well. The shares of a public company were invested in BP stock. An oil company was chosen due to previous work experience in the oil industry. The oil and gas market had been on a downward decline for quite some time but had seemed to have levelled out. The fact that the market had declined slowly means it is more along the lines of a recession instead of a market crash. This led to the thought that the price might have......

Words: 2597 - Pages: 11

Alex Sharpe Portfolio

...Case Study Assignment: Alex Sharpe's Portfolio 1. Estimate and compare the returns and variability (i.e. annual standard deviation over the past five years) of Reynolds and Hasbro with that of the S&P 500 Index. Which stock appears to be riskiest? | S&P 500 | REYNOLDS | HASBRO | Annualized Expected Return | 6.892% | 22.498% | 14.206% | Annualized Standard Deviation | 12.477% | 32.446% | 28.114% | Reynolds seems riskier than Hasbro due to its higher percentage of standard deviation. 2. Suppose Sharpe’s position had been 99% of equity funds invested in the S&P 500 and either 1% in Reynolds or one per cent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? How does this relate to your answer in question 1 above? * -  Scenario 1: = SP500 (99%) * Reynolds (1%) * = (.99) x (.689) + (.01) x (.2249)
 * = 0.06823 + 0.00224
= 0.07047 
 * = 7.05%
 * Standard Deviation = 12.3638% 
 * * * -  Scenario 2: = HASBRO (1%) SP500 (99%) = (.01) x (.1421) + (.99)......

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Alex Sharpe's Portfolio

...Alex Sharpe’s Portfolio 1. Returns and Risk Estimate and compare the returns and variability (i.e. annual standard deviation over the past five years) of Reynolds and Hasbro with that of the S&P 500 Index. Which stock appears to be riskiest? S&P: Monthly average return=0.57% Annual return= 6.89% Annual SD= 12.477% (monthly SD 3.60* 3.46 (square of 12)) Reynolds: Monthly average return= 1.87% Annual return= 1.87% * 12= 22.50% Annual SD: 32.446% (monthly SD 9.37* 3.46 (square of 12)) Hasbro: Monthly average return= 1.18% Annual return= 1.18% * 14.21% Annual SD= 28.114% (monthly SD 8.12* 3.46 (square of 12)) Conclusion: Correlation between high risk and high return. Reynolds is the riskier stock with an annual SD of 32.41% over 5 years, compared to Hasbro’s 28.08%. Reynolds annual return over the 5 year period of 22.50% is also higher than Hasbro’s return of 14.21%. 2. Portfolio Risk Suppose Sharpe’s position had been 99 percent of equity funds invested in the S&P 500 and either one percent in Reynolds over one percent in Hasbro. Estimate the resulting portfolio position. How does each stock affect the variability of the equity investment? How does this relate to your answer in question 1 above? ER of .99 S&P + .01 Reynolds Annual: 7.0481% SD of Reynolds in Portfolio Monthly: 3.5933% Annual: 12.4476% ER of .99 S&P + .01 Hasbro Annual: 6.9651% SD Hasbro in Portfolio Monthly: 3.6174% Annual: 12.5310% Results: Although......

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Alex Ferguson

...Alex Ferguson’s leadership style Case study Introduction Alexander Chapman Ferguson, known as Alex Ferguson, was born in 1941, in Govan Glasgow Scotland. As a teenager he was working as a tool’s apprentice in his father shipyard then in his 19, he became a labor union activist and an active member of the “Labor Party”. As far as Ferguson’s “the football player” career is concerned, actually, he did not achieve a successful career. In fact, as a player Ferguson started with a small local football team the “Queens Park and St Johnston” club. Afterward, he got the chance to join the “Glasgow Ranger” club, yet this union did not last since he resigned after being responsible for the defeat of his team against its fierce rival the “Glasgow Celtic” club. So determined, Alex Ferguson joined the “East Stirling” football club but this time as a manager rather than as a player. His first management period lasted for three seasons and then was recruited by the Scottish football team “Aberdeen”. With limited resources, Ferguson achieved the unthinkable, he won with his club the “European Winners’ Cup” during the 1982-3 season. This achievement with “Aberdeen” was a milestone in his career and made him “THE” coach that many big names in the European football scene like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Arsenal, and Tottenham, wanted to engage him. Ultimately, Ferguson chose to join Manchester United (MU). During his reign, Manchester United advanced from an ordinary local team to a top-class......

Words: 3271 - Pages: 14